Parents Accused of Cauing Autism + Genetic Tests Prior To Allegations

Dear Ministry of Justice,

due to 'autism' being caused by over 500 known chromosomal/genetic
abnormalities (please refer to UNIQUE the charity that deals with
rare chromosomal disorders) and by problems with white matter and/
corpus callosum (brain) such as Kim Peak has (the original 'Rain
man' suffered from) - how many children who's parents were accused
of 'causing' autism
were tested using 1.Fish/mFish/all known genetic/other tests to
identify neurological problems of a psychical nature to identify
chromosomal/genetic abnormalities/brain damage and/fMri to
establish whether or not the illness was physical / genetic or
psychological - how many chidden received these tests from January
1997 to December 24th 2009 whose parents were accused of causing
Autism?

Yours faithfully,

Liz R

Dear Data Access & Compliance Unit,

The are not going to tell the truth, these people are not able to
tell the truth, this exercise is an absolutely pointless one
-pointless other than exposing the truth that these pedants and
abusers and are unable to speak truth and if they do so
accidentally it's in an anal fashion by the blinkered slow-learning
that hasn't even read the basics of Freud yet (dead), there is no
hope for anally retentive pedants here, this is fact, educated
factual opinion, there is less hope for those who work for any
authority than ever before, this is all a futile exercise, they are
hopelessly entwined in confused sadistic training and little lost
souls not worth bothering anymore -

Yours sincerely,

Liz R

Dear Data Access & Compliance Unit,

Dear Ministry of Justice,

due to 'autism' being caused by over 500 known chromosomal/genetic
abnormalities (please refer to UNIQUE the charity that deals with
rare chromosomal disorders) and by problems with white matter and/
corpus callosum (brain) such as Kim Peak has (the original 'Rain
man' suffered from) - how many children who's parents were accused
of 'causing' autism
were tested using 1.Fish/mFish/all known genetic/other tests to
identify neurological problems of a psychical nature to identify
chromosomal/genetic abnormalities/brain damage and/fMri to
establish whether or not the illness was physical / genetic or
psychological - how many chidden received these tests from January
1997 to December 24th 2009 whose parents were accused of causing
Autism?

Yours faithfully,

Yours sincerely,

Liz R

Dear Data Access & Compliance Unit,

as an addendum;

Dear Department of Health,

From UNIQUE or www.rarechromo.org

''. If it helps, about 500 or so of our ca. 7000 individuals
registered in our database with any rare chromosome abnormality
have been reported to display autistic traits''

There are thousands of jobs created for Nazi-style ABA (USELESS
Behavioural schools and home-programs costing the taxpayer upwards
of £80,000 PA - encouraged by professionals such as Patricia Howlin
(I have reported now to police for conspiracy to pervert the course
of justice and for collusion with a colleague to harm a parent in a
court of law))

I believe she - Prof.Howlin-is part of the diagnostic fraternity
harming such children and their families by incorrectly diagnosing
them. Is she still part of the MRC ?

THERE IS NO SUCH ONE ILLNESS AS AUTISM; I would request you ask
Lorna Wing, creator of the NAS, who described AUTISM as something
like a 'triad of impairments' = simply 3 behaviours. Sadly she was
then just a mother getting it all wrong and didn't have the answers
we have today.

We now have 'fMri' (unintrusive brain scan), we now have 'mFish'
(genetic) tests, these would pick up on both unusual neural
activity to determine brain-damage or malfunction and any unusual
aspects (such as 'white matter' or malfunctioning neural pathways)
if/when used routinely. There are also metabolic disease not being
tested for that cause autism such as;
Sly Syndrome
Hunyer Synfrome
Hurler Syndrome
Angelman Syndrome
Isodicentric 15 (and all their 'spectrums)
< a few tiny examples of thousands.

How convenient it is to accuse parents of abuse/neglect when
neglecting to find the physical cause of the behaviours, thus
causing jobs for behaviourists and keeping children ill for life
with no prospect of being free from abuse? This is medicine? This
is cruelty to disabled children. This is gross negligence, people
will be sued.

It is an absolutely vast crime of grave criminal content and of
huge proportion against these children and their families, to use
behaviourism, and I can personally confirm, that all statistics
given by Eikeseth and Co (personally known to me for a long
time)LADDER and all supporting ABA (behaviourism) professionals
used in this 'therapy' are fraudulent and misleading - they do not
diagnose children using mFish and fMri as well as not assessing
education needs as the unique children they are with unique
responses/reaction times - this means one child may respond to
something 3 DAYS after being asked a question (or 'mand'- so 'slow'
or 'retarded' or low-IQ children *cannot respond* or appreciate
INSTANT reinforcement and to requests -it doesn't make any logical
sense to anyone *but* these greedy behaviorists whom appear very
nice and deeply believe, sometimes without malice- in their
brainwashed states, that they are doing the right thing, they have
good intentions, but they are, nonetheless, abusing children- they
will show you laughing children as an example of their success- as
they can make anyone laugh, it is deception and crime.
Ir appears to some that some of the less able children are being
groomed for Peadophiles.

I quote Kim Fellows (who threw my child across a room and used
extreme behaviourism/pin-down against my then little 4 year old who
has never ever had a behavioural problem) *'It is all about
compliance'* whatever way you word it.

They are grooming disabled children for more abuse.

So what benefit is it to anyone but a child abuser/peadophile- to
make a disabled child comply never complain> Why have they kept
mute children from having the latest (even free) technology to help
them communicate?

It is not in the he interest of these abusers for non verbal
children to speak, these children are meat to
Pedophiles/Peadophiles. You know it, I know it, they know it, what
are you going to do to stop this now?

Are you now complicit by inaction and guilty of association and
gross negligence?

To see a child giggle in a behavioural school, I would never ever
trust as an example of their ability or abilities- you'd need to
examine exactly the antecedent of that laughter, and the true
financial motives of these behaviourists and proponents and there
you have the REAL problem, there you have the pure abuse and crimes
against children and their families.

It needs addressing right now and without further notice please.

Betteleheim was was abusive psychologist who fed the myth that
'absent fathers' and 'refrigerator' mothers, cased the mysthical
'autism' with an equally silly man, Mr.Asher, and his protege the
struck-off Roy Meadow and David Southall- they got it wrong, so why
cant the government, or more importantly- your department- do this
correctly and put it all right- and not be maliciously damning
mothers and children who deserve the correct good treatment and
justice- instead of this hideous treatment from this hideous abuse
of children and their families so often?

This is no game, you are asking for wars by not providing access
-for good honest people -justice and good medicine-Betteleheim and
Co (who blamed ''refrigerator mothers' (this was generally for
'Asperger Syndrome' (that seems confused with very high mathmatical
intellegence)) - even had he been partially correct- the illnesses
produced from mother not bonding with their children would not be
of the type I'm referring to, but of attachment disorders-thjis is
KNOWN by the abusers I've mentioned- children develop despite bad
parents, they may not develop to the best of their ability but they
develop *unless there is a biological cause' (although there will
always be room for an exception at the moment until steps are taken
to diagnose properly and provid children with proper equipment and
communication aids as must begin right now, immediately, or this
little letter from me to you will likley be used as evidence by a
future generation who may come and have you all arrested) - what
you have with autistic behaviours is a plethora of organic,
metabolic and genetic illness and diversity that must and will be
tested from now properly- and to cease using Nazi-style repetitive
behavioural attacks on vulnerable children - in Treehouse and
Jigsaw and other behavioural schools, they are abusing children in
many ways - for example by making them do the same puzzle up to a
100 rimes a day - they completely disrupt a unique childs natural
way of learning to his or her unique ability- autism is not an
'EBD' (emotional/behavioural disorder) illness-please get your
heads out of the stone-age- behaviourally challenged children with
ASBOs perhaps- deserve ABA schools, not terrified, misunderstood
disabled ones- this government is indeed a big bully - the
reflexes- in severely learning disabled for example - in children
who have 'CAPD' or 'central auditory processing disorder' - means
the childs reflexes cannot work the same way as an normal child.
Bettelheim lied about his qualifications, abused children and then
killed himself as well as being a plagiarist- yet his work still
regarded as reading material worthy of a psychology degree? Still
condemning innocent parents and children to be slaves of state
sponsored pediophilia-psychology students all brainwashed into
thinking everything is psychology, nothing has a biological basis -
when in fact every single behaviour is biological- Every time
anyone reacts it's a release of a hormone- that is biological-
metabolic illnesses causing autism, as mentioned, here again are a
few- whop funds research into autism because they are not doing
anything other than groom and abuse? I'm doing this for free and
it's the truth- test for (at least)
Sly Syndrome
Hunyer Synfrome
Hurler Syndrome
Angelman Syndrome
Isodicentric 15 (and all their 'spectrums' please go to
rarechromo.org and speak to them about it, check for metabolic
disorders. Stop behaviourism it is cruelty no matter how well
dressed up, think of Pavlovs poodles in tu-tus and you are not far
off the mark.

Yours Sincerely,

Liz R

Yours sincerely,

Liz R

Dear Banaghan, Katharine,

thanks-answers being;

any and all recorded information pertaining to my request/s is
required and please supply me with detailed answers as to which
parts of the question/s you can't answer,

Yours sincerely,

Liz R

Dear Paul Hunt,

Thank you, I will try to put it another way;

1. Out of the 500(+)known chromosomal abnormalities
that cause autistic behaviour (or where the cause of autism is
proven physical in origin) that have gone though your courts, how
many of those cases
have gone on to find parents accused of causing the chromosomal
disorder? Or how many children are there in care/taken from their
natural parents and how many of those children suffer chromosnal
disorders, since 2005? (Only considering where a parent has been
blamed for causing the actual genetic disorder)

2 How many cases have involved autism

3. how many parents have been separated from their children due to
being blamed for causing autism?

4. Is there any recorded evidence that the children diagnosed with
Autism involved in any cases since July 2005 were tested using
Mfish genetic tests and or fMri scans ?

6. I am calling all judgements wrong and open to appeal that have
blamed any parent for causing autism/autistic behaviour
especially where a neurologist has ruled-out brain damage/a
chromosonal reason has been proven by mFish.

Do you have any records involving parents having been accused of
causing their childs' neurological problems despite a neurologist
confirming there was no physical damage? Ruling our psychical abuse
from parents?

If you don't have such records, I can send you some from a
neurologist, Dr.Cavanagh of Chelsea and Westminster Hospital
(proves a child had no physical brain damage but the child was
autistic)

Do you have any recorded evidence involving parents having been
accused of causing their childs' genetic problems despite a
geneticist confirming there was no physical damage?

7. Do you have any recorded evidence as to how any judge or social
worker has decided autism is psychological despite other evidence
arguing that point?

It seems these 'autistic' children, who can, now, thanks to
scientific breakthroughs, give evidence in appeals and for
compensation and so on will indeed do so- I am trying to warn the
courts and other professionals using out-dated hypothetical
sciences as well as request the information you have on these
topics, as people who are causing much grief in courts due to
blaming parents for all sorts of things will undoubtedly pay a very
heavy price at some point for causing such acute horror,and
inflicting such criminal false allegations, causing death, illness,
destruction - albeit unwittingly and due to plain ignorance of
scientific facts, sadly trusting to people/professors who haven't
kept abreast with breakthroughs in science as perhaps they ought to
have? Judges and social workers are not keeping abreast of
developments in the world of learning disabilities and they really
should.

Thanks in advance for any information you can provide regarding
any/all of the above and please let me know if you need further
clarification as soon as possible please,

Yours sincerely,

Liz R