ownership

Dear Sir or Madam,
good day to you what is the internal policy of certifying a vehicle
and what is the policy of taking the vehicle out of the category it
was given if it hasnt or isnt being used for the said category?
many thanks for your time

Yours faithfully,

mark-william:baker

Dear Paul Stephens,
ok this is to clarify what i mean

the category of plg(private light goods)
just to go to private use as i do not wish to use my car or van to
drive or transport but just to travel as a man and not as a legal
person by the law societies definition!so i wouldn't be a driver or
acting in commerce by the law societies definition driver(DRIVER.
One employed in conducting a coach, carriage, wagon, or other
vehicle, with horses, mules, or other animals.)
(commerce)to buy and sell!

hope this clarifies things for you can you please supply the
documentation requested

Yours sincerely,

mark-william:baker

Dear Sir or Madam,

i sent the last message as a follow up clarifying what was ment but
it seems not to of gone through please look at the last message for
clarification
many thanks for your time

Yours sincerely,

mark-william:baker

Dear Beverly Williams,
many thanks for your reply beverly i hope you dont mind me copying
this freedom of information for future use as i take it if there is
no such taxation class then i dont need the license to use it in
that class.
this is turning out to be quite a day as ive also been told that im
part of a society i have never applied for and am currently looking
for ending the membership and if i cant then that is forced slavery
and a criminal offence as all societies must be volentry if they
are not then that construes as slavery have a great day and hope
its going as great as mine.
many thanks

Yours sincerely,

mark-william:baker

Dear FOI FOI,
well id like to point out it wasnt actually a question it was a
thanking reply for beverly's honesty i have to say that private
light goods is not private use because it still draws people into a
commercial activity unknowingly which i am not doing and the
failure on behalf of dvla and the legislators i feel are knowingly
deceiving people out of their money!especially considering the 1930
road fund license was wound up and never been renewed!and has ever
since been parliaments obligation to pay for the maintenence of the
roads and not the people.also due to the illegalities of the
afganistan and iraq wars by paying any tax to the government for
funding wars then takes you into the realm of conduct ancillary to
genocide,conduct ancillary against humanity,conduct ancillary to
war crimes which are 3 crimes under section 52 of the international
criminal court act 2001,and complicity to crimes against peace
which is a crime under the nerumberg principles.

Article 24 Chapter VI of the Manual of Military Law applies to
every British citizen and taxpayer as well as to
servicemen and women. This means that if a government embarks on an
illegal war, anyone who cooperates
with a government that wages a war of aggression is complicit in a
crime against peace and is
criminally liable as an accessory to war crimes.

“Whosoever shall aid, abet, counsel or procure the commission of
any indictable offense, whether the
same be an offense at common law or by virtue of any Act passed or
to be passed, shall be liable to be
tried, indicted, and punished as a principal offender.” Section 8
of the Accessories and Abettors Act
1861

i mean look we can both throw acts and statutes at each other all
day long cant we and these were just the worst ones for a defense
and compared to your arguement it kind of makes your look petty (no
insult intended)

but im looking at this from a moral and lawful perspective rather
then a legislatory technicality and after all statutes can only be
given force by the consent of the governed. i dont consent!

Yours sincerely,

mark-william:baker