Follow this request
There is 1 person following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason
To South Yorkshire Police by Keith 14 May 2009
Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason
To Cumbria Constabulary by Keith 14 May 2009
Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason
To Fife Constabulary by Keith 14 May 2009
Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason
To Kent Police by Keith 14 May 2009
Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason
To Cheshire Constabulary by Keith 14 May 2009
Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason
To Northumbria Police by Keith 14 May 2009
Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason
To Devon and Cornwall Constabulary by Keith 14 May 2009
Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason
To Greater Manchester Police by Keith 14 May 2009
Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason
To Essex Police by Keith 14 May 2009
Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason
To City of London Police by Keith 14 May 2009
Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason
Keith made this Freedom of Information request to Staffordshire Police
Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, Staffordshire Police should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.
From: Keith
14 May 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Kindly supply me with:
1 - The total number of individual members of public (if any) that
have reported, with DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE (as in this download
(600MB): [ http://www.megaupload.com/?d=QGYFFSVV ]), the
individuals that made up the HEATH GOVERNMENT and SUBSEQUENT
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, for the CRIME OF TREASON.
2 - What positive action, if any, by yourselves was taken on
receipt of the said documented proof?
3 - If not taken seriously and dismissed:
a) how far up the chain of command the reported crime go until
enquiries were terminated?
b) what is the name of the public servant that made the decision?
c) what was the reason for the decision?
d) does that public servant still hold his/her position of
authority?
4 - If more than one report has been made to yourselves, was the
same public servant responsible for the decision not to submit the
documented evidence for the prosecution of the criminals.
Thank you.
Yours faithfully,
Keith
Staffordshire Police
14 May 2009
Dear Keith.
Under section 8 of the Freedom of Information Act for a request for
information to be valid it must be in writing, state the name of the
applicant and an address for correspondence and describe the information
requested.
Unfortunately, following guidance from the Information Commissioner's
Office (attached below) you have not complied with the second of those
conditions and supplied up with a name.
I would be very grateful if you could resubmit your application with your
full name as per the ICO's guidance.
Secondly you have supplied a link to a download site to download
additional information for your request. Unfortunately, because of the
security systems in place on our network, that website is inaccessible.
Can you please supply the additional information either as an attachment
to your request or, if possible, by cutting and pasting the information
into your request.
Many Thanks
===============================================
Steven W. Clark
Freedom of Information Officer
Staffordshire Police
Ext. 2411 Direct Dial: 01785 232411
Keith To FOI requests at Staffordshire
<[FOI #12000 email]> Police
<[Staffordshire Police request email]>
14/05/2009 13:13 cc
Please think of the environment. Do you Subject Freedom of Information request -
really need to print this email? Number Of Reported Cases Of
Treason
Dear Sir or Madam,
Kindly supply me with:
1 - The total number of individual members of public (if any) that
have reported, with DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE (as in this download
(600MB): [ [1]http://www.megaupload.com/?d=QGYFFSVV ]), the
individuals that made up the HEATH GOVERNMENT and SUBSEQUENT
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, for the CRIME OF TREASON.
2 - What positive action, if any, by yourselves was taken on
receipt of the said documented proof?
3 - If not taken seriously and dismissed:
a) how far up the chain of command the reported crime go until
enquiries were terminated?
b) what is the name of the public servant that made the decision?
c) what was the reason for the decision?
d) does that public servant still hold his/her position of
authority?
4 - If more than one report has been made to yourselves, was the
same public servant responsible for the decision not to submit the
documented evidence for the prosecution of the criminals.
Thank you.
Yours faithfully,
Keith
show quoted sections
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests





