Follow this request
There is 1 person following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason
To Devon and Cornwall Constabulary by Keith 14 May 2009
Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason
To City of London Police by Keith 14 May 2009
Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason
To Essex Police by Keith 14 May 2009
Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason
To South Yorkshire Police by Keith 14 May 2009
Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason
To Leicestershire Constabulary by Keith 14 May 2009
Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason
To Kent Police by Keith 14 May 2009
Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason
To Cumbria Constabulary by Keith 14 May 2009
Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason
To Fife Constabulary by Keith 14 May 2009
Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason
To Northumbria Police by Keith 14 May 2009
Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason
To Staffordshire Police by Keith 14 May 2009
Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason
Keith made this Freedom of Information request to Lancashire Constabulary
The request was refused by Lancashire Constabulary.
From: Keith
14 May 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Kindly supply me with:
1 - The total number of individual members of public (if any) that
have reported, with DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE (as in this download
(600MB): [ http://www.megaupload.com/?d=QGYFFSVV ]), the
individuals that made up the HEATH GOVERNMENT and SUBSEQUENT
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, for the CRIME OF TREASON.
2 - What positive action, if any, by yourselves was taken on
receipt of the said documented proof?
3 - If not taken seriously and dismissed:
a) how far up the chain of command the reported crime go until
enquiries were terminated?
b) what is the name of the public servant that made the decision?
c) what was the reason for the decision?
d) does that public servant still hold his/her position of
authority?
4 - If more than one report has been made to yourselves, was the
same public servant responsible for the decision not to submit the
documented evidence for the prosecution of the criminals.
Thank you.
Yours faithfully,
Keith
From: Walker, Paul
Lancashire Constabulary
21 May 2009
`Keith',
Your request for information has now been considered and I am writing to
inform you that it has not been recognised as a legitimate request under
the Freedom of Information Act 2000 at this stage. Section 8(1)(b) states
that the request must state the name of the applicant and an address for
correspondence, and section 8(2)(c) highlights that the text of the
request is capable of being used for subsequent reference.
In this instance, you have only provided a contact name of `Keith' with no
surname. This is not deemed to be the full name of the applicant in order
to respond to and/or use for subsequent reference. Therefore, I am unable
to process your request at this time. However, if you provide a full
contact name, I will gladly recognise your request as being legitimate
under the act and process it accordingly.
Please note the Information Commissioner's Office has produced the
following guidance on this issue:
[1]http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/l...
Many Thanks,
Paul.
Paul Walker
Lancashire Constabulary
Information Assurance Unit
show quoted sections
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests





