Dear Sir or Madam,

Kindly supply me with:

1 - The total number of individual members of public (if any) that
have reported, with DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE (as in this download
(600MB): [ http://www.megaupload.com/?d=QGYFFSVV ]), the
individuals that made up the HEATH GOVERNMENT and SUBSEQUENT
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, for the CRIME OF TREASON.

2 - What positive action, if any, by yourselves was taken on
receipt of the said documented proof?

3 - If not taken seriously and dismissed:

a) how far up the chain of command the reported crime go until
enquiries were terminated?

b) what is the name of the public servant that made the decision?

c) what was the reason for the decision?

d) does that public servant still hold his/her position of
authority?

4 - If more than one report has been made to yourselves, was the
same public servant responsible for the decision not to submit the
documented evidence for the prosecution of the criminals.

Thank you.

Yours faithfully,

Keith

Dear Keith

Reference Number 367/2009

I write in connection with your e-mail dated the 14 May 2009 and received
today the 15 May 2009 concerning the "...crime of treason".

Dyfed Powys Police is not required to respond to your enquiry as it has
been considered that it does not fall within the meaning of a request as
identified within Section 8 (Request for information) of the Freedom of
Information Act 2000 (The Act). This decision has been made because you
have not included a surname to which we can respond. In coming to this
decision Dyfed Powys Police has taken due cognisance to the Information
Commissioner's Office guidance document "Valid request - name and address
for correspondence".

The guidance document is available via the Information Commissioner's
Office website at the following hyperlink:

[1]"Valid request - name and address for correspondence"

The document provides guidance on what constitutes a real name and gives
examples of what the Information Commissioner's Office believes satisfies
the requirements of the Act. Therefore at this time and without the
provision of a surname Dyfed Powys Police is not in a position to process
your enquiry as it is considered that it is not a valid request.
Therefore in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000 this
e-mail acts as a refusal notice. Should you wish to re-submit your
enquiry to include a surname Dyfed Powys Police will then consider your
request for information under the Act. Should you decide to re-submit your
enquiry it would be helpful to the process if you could include details of
the time period your request for information refers eg the last 12 months,
5 years, 10 years etc and whether the time period covers calendar or
financial years.

I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your interest in
Dyfed Powys Police. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you wish
to discuss this matter further.

Yours sincerely

Debby Jones MBA

Pennaeth Rhyddid Gwybodaeth/Head of FOI

Uned Rhyddid Gwybodaeth/Freedom of Information Unit

Pencadlys yr Heddlu/Police Headquarters

Caerfyrddin/Carmarthen

Ffon/Tel: 0845 330 2000 est/ext 23442

Llinell Uniongyrchol/Direct Line: 01267 226596

[2][Dyfed Powys Police request email]

Dyfed Powys Police provides you the right to request a re-examination of your
case under its review procedure (copy enclosed). If you decide to request such a
review and having followed the Force's full process you are still dissatisfied,
then you have the right to direct your comments to the Information Commissioner
who will give it consideration.

References

Visible links
1. http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/l...
2. mailto:[Dyfed Powys Police request email]
mailto:[Dyfed Powys Police request email]