Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason

Keith made this Freedom of Information request to Devon and Cornwall Constabulary

Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, Devon and Cornwall Constabulary should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.

From: Keith

14 May 2009

Dear Sir or Madam,

Kindly supply me with:

1 - The total number of individual members of public (if any) that
have reported, with DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE (as in this download
(600MB): [ http://www.megaupload.com/?d=QGYFFSVV ]), the
individuals that made up the HEATH GOVERNMENT and SUBSEQUENT
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, for the CRIME OF TREASON.

2 - What positive action, if any, by yourselves was taken on
receipt of the said documented proof?

3 - If not taken seriously and dismissed:

a) how far up the chain of command the reported crime go until
enquiries were terminated?

b) what is the name of the public servant that made the decision?

c) what was the reason for the decision?

d) does that public servant still hold his/her position of
authority?

4 - If more than one report has been made to yourselves, was the
same public servant responsible for the decision not to submit the
documented evidence for the prosecution of the criminals.

Thank you.

Yours faithfully,

Keith

Link to this

Devon and Cornwall Constabulary

14 May 2009

Dear Keith

I write in connection with your request for information which was received
by this office on May 14, 2009. I understand you are requesting the
following information:

1 - The total number of individual members of public (if any) that have
reported, with DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE (as in this download (600MB):
[[1]http://www.megaupload.com/?d=QGYFFSVV ]), the individuals that made up
the HEATH GOVERNMENT and SUBSEQUENT GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, for the CRIME OF
TREASON.

2 - What positive action, if any, by yourselves was taken on receipt of
the said documented proof?

3 - If not taken seriously and dismissed:
a) how far up the chain of command the reported crime go until enquiries
were terminated?
b) what is the name of the public servant that made the decision?
c) what was the reason for the decision?
d) does that public servant still hold his/her position of authority?

4 - If more than one report has been made to yourselves, was the same
public servant responsible for the decision not to submit the documented
evidence for the prosecution of the criminals.

Your request will be considered in accordance with the Freedom of
Information Act 2000. You should expect to be sent a response within the
statutory limit of 20 working days, subject to the provisions of the Act.

Should you have any further inquiries concerning this matter, please
contact me quoting my reference number as above.

Yours sincerely

Louise Fenwick
Freedom of Information Officer
(01392 452203 (x22203)
Information Management Department
Devon & Cornwall Constabulary

show quoted sections

References

Visible links
1. http://www.megaupload.com/?d=QGYFFSVV
2. http://www.devon-cornwall.police.uk/

Link to this

Devon and Cornwall Constabulary

18 May 2009

Dear Keith,

I write in connection with your request for information which was received
by this office on May 14, 2009. I understand you are requesting the
following information:

1 - The total number of individual members of public (if any) that have
reported, with DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE (as in this download (600MB):
[[1]http://www.megaupload.com/?d=QGYFFSVV ]), the individuals that made up
the HEATH GOVERNMENT and SUBSEQUENT GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, for the CRIME OF
TREASON.

2 - What positive action, if any, by yourselves was taken on receipt of
the said documented proof?

3 - If not taken seriously and dismissed:
a) how far up the chain of command the reported crime go until enquiries
were terminated?
b) what is the name of the public servant that made the decision?
c) what was the reason for the decision?
d) does that public servant still hold his/her position of authority?

4 - If more than one report has been made to yourselves, was the same
public servant responsible for the decision not to submit the documented
evidence for the prosecution of the criminals.

Your request for information has now been considered and I am writing to
inform you that it has not been recognised as a legitimate request under
the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Section 8(1)(b) states that the
request must state the name of the applicant and an address for
correspondence, and section 8(2)(c) highlights that the text of the
request is capable of being used for subsequent reference.

You have only provided a contact name of Keith with no surname. This is
not deemed to be the full name of the applicant in order to respond to
and/or use for subsequent reference. Therefore, I am unable to process
your request at this time. However, if you provide a full contact name, I
will gladly recognise your request as being legitimate under the act and
process it as appropriate.
Please note the Information Commissioner's Office has produced the
following guidance on this issue:
[2]http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/l...
Should you have any further inquiries concerning this matter, please
contact me quoting my reference number as above.

Yours sincerely

Louise Fenwick
Freedom of Information Officer
(01392 452203 (x22203)
Information Management Department
Devon & Cornwall Constabulary

show quoted sections

References

Visible links
1. http://www.megaupload.com/?d=QGYFFSVV
2. http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/l...
3. http://www.devon-cornwall.police.uk/

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Devon and Cornwall Constabulary only: