Number Of Reported Cases Of Treason

Keith made this Freedom of Information request to Avon and Somerset Constabulary

Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, Avon and Somerset Constabulary should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.

From: Keith

14 May 2009

Dear Sir or Madam,

Kindly supply me with:

1 - The total number of individual members of public (if any) that
have reported, with DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE (as in this download
(600MB): [ http://www.megaupload.com/?d=QGYFFSVV ]), the
individuals that made up the HEATH GOVERNMENT and SUBSEQUENT
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, for the CRIME OF TREASON.

2 - What positive action, if any, by yourselves was taken on
receipt of the said documented proof?

3 - If not taken seriously and dismissed:

a) how far up the chain of command the reported crime go until
enquiries were terminated?

b) what is the name of the public servant that made the decision?

c) what was the reason for the decision?

d) does that public servant still hold his/her position of
authority?

4 - If more than one report has been made to yourselves, was the
same public servant responsible for the decision not to submit the
documented evidence for the prosecution of the criminals.

Thank you.

Yours faithfully,

Keith

Link to this

From: #Freedom of Information Requests
Avon and Somerset Constabulary

15 May 2009

Attachment A S Appeals Procedure E Mail.doc
51K Download View as HTML

Avon and Somerset Constabulary

Corporate Information Management Department

Force Headquarters, PO Box 37, Valley Road,

Portishead, Bristol, BS20 8QJ

Facsimile 01275 814667

Private
Keith
[email address] Our Reference 09/308
Your reference
Date 15 May 2009

Dear Keith,

I write in connection with your request for information dated 14^th May
2009 concerning the total number of individual members of public that have
reported the individuals that made up the HEATH Government and subsequent
Government officials reported for the crime of treason.

Your request for information has now been considered and I am writing to
inform you that it has not been recognised as a legitimate request under
the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Section 8(1)(b) highlights that the
request must state the name of the applicant and an address for
correspondence,… and Section 8(2)(c) highlights that the text of the
request is capable of being used for subsequent reference.

You have only provided a contact name of Keith with no surname. This is
not deemed to be the full name of the applicant in order to respond to
and/or use for subsequent reference. Therefore, I am unable to process
your request at this time. However, if you provide a full contact name, I
will gladly recognise your request as being legitimate under the act and
process it as appropriate.

I regret that I cannot assist any further at this time, but would like to
take this opportunity to thank you for your interest in Avon and Somerset
Constabulary

Yours sincerely,

Freedom of Information Officer

Freedom of Information Officer
Corporate Information Management Department

Please note;

1. Requests and responses may be published on Avon and Somerset
Constabulary’s website (within 24 hours), some of which may
contain a link to additional information, which may provide
you with further clarification.
2. Whilst we may verbally discuss your request with you in order
to seek clarification, all other communication should be made
in writing.
3. Avon and Somerset Constabulary provides you with the right to
request a re-examination of your case under its review
procedure. (copy attached)

<<A&S Appeals Procedure - E-Mail.doc>>

Link to this

steve james left an annotation ( 6 January 2010)

Get a move on with this

The rule book states treason is more serious a crime than murder

So why is this request long overdue ?

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Avon and Somerset Constabulary only: