Follow this request
There are 2 people following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
FOI complaints about Common Purpose
To Information Commissioner’s Office by John Walker 30 September 2009
Complaints against Barnet Council
To Information Commissioner’s Office by Adam Langleben 17 October 2011
Data Protection
To Caerphilly Council by Jamie Pugh 6 July 2011
COST OF BANKRUPTING THE PIER OWNER
To Conwy County Borough Council by Mr Hall 17 July 2009
Statistics FOI/EIR Complaints
To Information Commissioner’s Office by Phil Roberts 11 December 2010
Data Protection Act fines within the last 3 years
To Information Commissioner’s Office by Frank 20 October 2009
Breaches of Data Protection
To Information Commissioner’s Office by Ken 9 November 2009
PSNI Breaches of the DPA
To Information Commissioner’s Office by Shannon McLaughlin 24 August 2011
Breaches of DPA regulations by Common Purpose
To Information Commissioner’s Office by John Walker 10 May 2010
Action taken in 2011
To Information Commissioner’s Office by P Seurre 22 January 2012
Number of complaints against Conwy Council
A White made this Freedom of Information request to Information Commissioner’s Office
The request was successful.
From: A White
19 December 2009
Dear Information Commissioner’s Office,
I would be grateful if you would update the request made by "Colwyn
Resident" some 15 months ago regarding the numbers of complaints
made against Conwy Council (known variously as Conwy Council, Conwy
County Borough Council and Conwy County Council) in respect of the
council's performance under the requirements of the Freedom of
Information Act and the Data Protection Act.
Please advise, for the period from 1st September 2008 to date, how
many individual complaints have been made against this council, how
many investigations have been launched, how many complaints have
been upheld, how many occasions the council has been instructed to
change its decisions or guidance issued regarding amendments of
replies regarding the provision of each type of information
(including instructions issued for complaints raised prior to
1/9/08 but issued afterwards) and how many (if any) cases have
resulted in legal action (whether or not this proceeded to Court or
simply instruction of lawyers).
Many thanks
Yours faithfully,
Mr A White
Information Commissioner’s Office
19 January 2010
Link: [1]File-List
19th January 2010
Case Reference Number IRQ0285800
Dear Mr White
I write with reference to your request for information dated 19 December
2009. Your request has been dealt with under the Freedom of Information
Act 2000.
Request:
For the period from 1 September 2008 to date, how many individual
complaints have been made against the council in respect of the council
performance under the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act and
the Data Protection Act
Numbers Received
Freedom of Information – 4
Data Protection - 5
Outcomes
The outcomes or status of these cases are recorded on our system are as
follows:
Freedom of Information complaints
Closed – Withdrawn – 2
Closed – Insufficient evidence -2
Data Protection complaints
Closed – compliance unlikely – remedial action taken - 1
Open - 4
In two cases the council were asked to review their decisions. The first
was in relation to a data protection complaint which resulted in the
outcome of compliance unlikely. The terms ‘compliance likely’ and
‘compliance unlikely’ refer to the duty placed on the Commissioner
when considering an allegation of a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998
to make an assessment as to whether in his view compliance with the
principle of the Act is likely or unlikely. A breach of any of the data
protection principles is not a criminal offence and the term ‘remedial
action taken’ refers to the organisation having taken some steps to
prevent a breach reoccurring.
The second was part of the informal resolution of a complaint concerning
an alleged breach of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. The council
provided some information which it had previously withheld from the
requester.
There have been no cases which have resulted in legal action. If you are
dissatisfied with the response you have received and wish to request a
review of our decision or make a complaint about how your request has been
handled you should write to the Internal Compliance Team at the address
below or e-mail [2][email address]
Your request for internal review should be submitted to us within 40
working days of receipt by you of this response. Any such request
received after this time will only be considered at the discretion of the
Commissioner.
If having exhausted the review process you are not content that your
request or review has been dealt with correctly, you have a further right
of appeal to this office in our capacity as the statutory complaint
handler under the legislation. To make such an application, please write
to the Case Reception Team, at the address below or visit the
‘Complaints’ section of our website to make a Freedom of Information
Act or Environmental Information Regulations complaint online.
A copy of our review procedure is attached.
Yours sincerely
Charlotte Powell
Internal Compliance Manager
Yours sincerely
show quoted sections
Information Commissioner's Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow,
Cheshire, SK9 5AF
Tel: 01625 545 700 Fax: 01625 524 510 Web: www.ico.gov.uk
References
Visible links
1. file:///tmp/radBB6D2_files/filelist.xml
2. mailto:[email address]
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests






Steve Hunt left an annotation (20 January 2010)
... and I know Mr Hall is also awaiting response on open case(s) too: http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/user/mr_hall
... and that is just the complaints against FOI requests made via this website, never mind FOI requests made by other means, or any Data Protection cases made by any means.
According to the ICO's response, they are no open FOI cases?, just 4 open Data Protection cases.
Also in that period, after a mamouth case investigated by their Cardiff Office, CCBC were found to be "compliance unlikely" (or however they put it) against an FOI complaint by me - I don't have the reference number to hand at the moment, but will post it later on. Now, the ICO's response is that there have been NO "compliance unlikely" findings in that period.
Seems to be something very wrong in the figures the ICO have released.
Link to this