NICE IOG compliance for Head & Neck Cancer Surgery
A Freedom of Information request to Department of Health by Peter Mellor
The request was partially successful.
Peter Mellor
12 June 2008
Dear Sir or Madam, Why is 100 cases & 1 million population a
satisfactory criterion of excellence? It means that a bad team
which meets these requirements is IOG-compliant whereas a good team
which falls short of these figures is non-compliant - silly.
Surgery outcomes should be used to compare whether units of
whatever size are for for purpose.
IOG-compliance based on surgery cases only is a small part of the
issue - better recognition by GPs, better diagnosis and better
after-treatment (including the best drugs) would have a greater
effect but are ignored - why?
NHS management's only justification is to provide the facilities
and conditions in which the clinicians can work best. Instead they
use NHS funds to give them mastery over clinicians.
In a "patient-led NHS" we expected patients to be considered but we
have consultations where the outcome is already decided, regardless
of public opinion - why?
Yours faithfully,
Peter Mellor
Department of Health
26 June 2008
Email Content stored in attached file 'Long_Email_Body_26_06_2008.html'.
show quoted sections
Things to do with this request
Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)Reply to Department of Health (Peter Mellor only)
Respond to request (FOI officers only)



