Follow this request
There is 1 person following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
MV Derbyshire clarifications
To Department for Transport by daniela drysdale 10 February 2009
MV Derbyshire
To Department for Transport by daniela drysdale 3 October 2008
MV Derbyshire and FV Gaul
To Maritime and Coastguard Agency by daniela drysdale 11 February 2009
FV Trident - Information on MAIB's collection/assessment of evidence for the re-opened formal investigation into her loss
To Marine Accident Investigation Branch by daniela drysdale 15 November 2010
Corruption Investigations
To Home Office by daniela drysdale 6 December 2011
Grounds for the re-opening of the Formal Investigation (RFI) into the loss of FV Trident by the Secretary of State for Transport under the provisions of the Merchant Shipping Act
To Department for Transport by daniela drysdale 10 January 2011
Trawler Gaul
To Department for Transport by daniela drysdale 22 October 2008
MFV Trident Re-opened Formal Investigation
To Department for Transport by daniela drysdale 2 June 2010
Evidence undermining the results of the 2004 FV Gaul Formal Investigation
To Department for Transport by daniela drysdale 4 July 2008
MV Derbyshire non-compliance with the standards
daniela drysdale made this Freedom of Information request to Department for Transport
Department for Transport did not have the information requested.
From: daniela drysdale
28 January 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
With regard to the 2000 Re-opened Formal Investigation into the
sinking of MV Derbyshire.
A paper published at
http://mv-derbyshire.blogspot.com/2009/0...
reveals that the hatch covers on the Derbyshire complied neither
with the minimum strength requirements of the International Load
Line Convention 66 nor with the standards of Lloyd’s Register of
Shipping, in force at the time of the vessel’s build, and that
these non-compliances could have been a crucial factor in the loss
of the vessel.
The final report of the 2000 Derbyshire RFI appears to have have
'overlooked' this fact, stating instead that: “7.16 At the time of
the DERBYSHIRE’s last voyage her hatch covers complied with the
minimum strength requirements of ILLC 66 and of the Lloyd’s
Register of Shipping Rules”.
I would therefore be grateful if you could answer the following
questions:
Does the Department agree with the arguments and disclosures
presented in the above-mentioned online article? If not, could you
provide us with your specific (technical) counter-arguments and
with information regarding the identity of those who formulated
them and offered you technical advice on this matter.
Yours faithfully,
Daniela Drysdale
From: daniela drysdale
4 February 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Could you please acknowledge receipt of my FOI request of 28
January 2009 and confirm that you will be answering it within the
time prescribed by law?
Yours sincerely,
Daniela Drysdale
From: Adam Paine
Department for Transport
6 February 2009
Ms Drysdale,
Please find attached the Department's response to your FOI request of 28
January, in which you asked about the Department's views regarding
information published online about the MV Derbyshire and the reopened
formal inquiry into its loss.
Regards,
Adam Paine.
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
show quoted sections
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests






daniela drysdale left an annotation (10 February 2009)
Link to this