Follow this request
There are 2 people following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Mayor of London Transport Strategy - Consultation Process - How many aware within LB Barnet?
To Barnet Borough Council by Ruthlyn Black 15 January 2010
Mayor of London Transport Strategy - Consultation Process - How many aware within LB Bexley?
To Bexley Borough Council by Ruthlyn Black 15 January 2010
Mayor of London Transport Strategy - Consultation Process - How many aware within LB Brent?
To Brent Borough Council by Ruthlyn Black 15 January 2010
Mayor of London Transport Strategy - Consultation Process - How many aware within LB Bromley?
To Bromley Borough Council by Ruthlyn Black 15 January 2010
Mayor of London Transport Strategy - Consultation Process - How many aware within LB Camden?
To Camden Borough Council by Ruthlyn Black 15 January 2010
Mayor of London Transport Strategy - Consultation Process - How many aware within LB Ealing?
To Ealing Borough Council by Ruthlyn Black 15 January 2010
Mayor of London Transport Strategy - Consultation Process - How many aware within LB Enfield?
To Enfield Council by Ruthlyn Black 15 January 2010
Mayor of London Transport Strategy - Consultation Process - How many aware within LB Greenwich?
To Greenwich Borough Council by Ruthlyn Black 15 January 2010
Mayor of London Transport Strategy - Consultation Process - How many aware within LB Harrow?
To Harrow Borough Council by Ruthlyn Black 15 January 2010
Mayor of London Transport Strategy - Consultation Process - How many aware within LB Hackney?
Ruthlyn Black made this Freedom of Information request to Hackney Borough Council
The request was successful.
From: Ruthlyn Black
15 January 2010
Dear Hackney Borough Council,
It has become apparent that many organisations and members of the
public in LB Hackney were not aware of the recent consultation into
the Draft Mayor of London Transport Strategy.
Please explain the steps that Hackney Council took with TfL to make
the public aware of consultation into the Draft Mayor of London
Transport Strategy.
(1) What publicity was undertaken across LB Hackney by TfL and by
LB Hackney?
(2) What was published that explained the Draft Strategy and the
consultation process and how were these made available?
(3) What steps were taken to try to ensure a balanced cross-section
of the public was made aware of the process?
(4) Where were leaflets distributed, and how was this decided?
What analysis suggested this would lead to a fair and balanced
distribution across the community?
(5) What steps were taken to ensure that hard-to-reach sections of
the community, such as those who travel exclusively by private car,
were made aware of the consultation process and encouraged to
participate in it?
(6) What consultation discussions took place between LB Hackney and
TfL over how this process would operate?
To what extent was the council consulted over the detail of the
consultation, and what views did it express?
(7) Is the council happy with the consultation process?
Was the council happy that the online questionnaire was so
flagrantly biased?
Was the council happy that were responders allowed to pick as many
as they chose from an uncosted wish-list?
(7) What steps were taken to inform and involve organisations
likely to have an interest?
(8) What programme of meetings was organised?
Did Hackney Council ask TfL to attend meetings of the council's
Neighbourhood Partnerships, and how many did receive reports on the
consultation from TfL?
(9) How many meetings took place within LB Hackney between TfL and
the council as part of the consultation process?
What about with local groups in LB Hackney?
(10) What pre-consultation took place with interested parties to
ensure that the process was fair and balanced?
(11) Does the council support a MTS consultation on the Draft Mayor
of London Transport Strategy that offers so little for the driver -
private motorist or professional driver of taxi, minicab, van,
lorry or bus?
How important are private drivers in the overall use of transport
in Hackney?
Has the council expressed concerns over this unfair and unbalanced
aspect of the consultation process?
(12) Does the council support a MTS in which the promotion of
cycling within the draft MTS does not also include warnings on the
dangers of this mode?
Does the council support the proposition that a mass switch to
cycling would be beneficial justified, and on what evidence?
(13) Does the council support a MTS consultation in which costings
of various suggestions were not put forward, so that the public
could see how much tax each would entail?
(14) Does the council support a MTS consultation in which there was
no question on the level of subsidy that each mode should receive?
(15) Does the council support a MTS consultation in which no
question is asked as to whether the users of a mode should bear
all, most, some or whatever proportion of the costs of providing
that mode?
(16) What representations has or will the council make regarding
the consultation process into the Draft MTS as a result of this
enquiry or otherwise?
Yours faithfully,
Ruthlyn Black
From: Pheng Lay
Hackney Borough Council
19 January 2010
Dear Ms Black
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000 - request for information.
I acknowledge your request for information received on 15 January 2010.
Your request is being considered and you will receive a full response to
your request, within the statutory timescale of 20 working days (from
the day after the request is received) as defined by the Freedom of
Information Act 2000.
If appropriate, the information may be provided in paper copy, normal
font size. If you require alternative formats, e.g. language, audio,
large print, etc. then please let me know.
The Act defines a number of exemptions, some of which are subject to a
public interest test that may prevent release of the information. You
will be informed if this is the case, and you have a right to appeal
against our decision. Information relating to this will be included in
any refusal notice issued.
If the information you request contains reference to a third party then
they may be consulted prior to a decision being taken on whether or not
to release the information to you.
There may be a fee payable for this information. This will be considered
and you will be informed if a fee is payable. In this event the fee must
be paid before the information is processed and released. The 20 working
day time limit for responses is suspended until receipt of the payment.
If you have any queries or concerns then please contact me at the
address above.
Further information is also available from the Information Commissioner
at:
Information Commissioner's Office
Wycliffe House
Water Lane
Wilmslow
Cheshire
SK9 5AF
Telephone: 01625 545 700
www.informationcommissioner.gov.uk
Yours sincerely
Tat-Pheng Lay
Freedom of Information Assistant
show quoted sections
From: Pheng Lay
Hackney Borough Council
12 February 2010
Dear Ms Black
Please find attached a response to your Freedom of Information request
received on 15 January 2010.
Yours sincerely
Tat-Pheng Lay
Freedom of Information Assistant
Hackney Council may exercise its right to intercept any communication, the
only exception to this would be confidential survey data, with any
employee or agent of the Council using its telephony or data networks. By
using these networks you give your consent to Hackney Council monitoring
and recording your communication.
If you have received this e-mail in error please delete it immediately and
contact the sender.
For further information about Hackney Council policies please contact
Hackney Service Centre on: 020 8356 3000
**********************************************************************
London Borough of Hackney may exercise its right to intercept any
communication on its networks - for more information see
http://www.hackney.gov.uk/email_disclaim...
**********************************************************************
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests





