Follow this request

There are 2 people following this request

Act on what you've learnt

Similar requests

More similar requests

Event history details

Are you the owner of any commercial copyright on this page?

Mayor of London Transport Strategy - Consultation Process - How many aware within LB Enfield?

Ruthlyn Black made this Freedom of Information request to Enfield Council

The request was successful.

From: Ruthlyn Black

15 January 2010

Dear Enfield Council,

It has become apparent that many organisations and members of the
public in LB Enfield were not aware of the recent consultation into
the Draft Mayor of London Transport Strategy.

Please explain the steps that Enfield Council took with TfL to make
the public aware of consultation into the Draft Mayor of London
Transport Strategy.

(1) What publicity was undertaken across LB Enfield by TfL and by
LB Enfield?

(2) What was published that explained the Draft Strategy and the
consultation process and how were these made available?

(3) What steps were taken to try to ensure a balanced cross-section
of the public was made aware of the process?

(4) Where were leaflets distributed, and how was this decided?
What analysis suggested this would lead to a fair and balanced
distribution across the community?

(5) What steps were taken to ensure that hard-to-reach sections of
the community, such as those who travel exclusively by private car,
were made aware of the consultation process and encouraged to
participate in it?

(6) What consultation discussions took place between LB Enfield and
TfL over how this process would operate?
To what extent was the council consulted over the detail of the
consultation, and what views did it express?

(7) Is the council happy with the consultation process?
Was the council happy that the online questionnaire was so
flagrantly biased?
Was the council happy that were responders allowed to pick as many
as they chose from an uncosted wish-list?

(7) What steps were taken to inform and involve organisations
likely to have an interest?

(8) What programme of meetings was organised?
Did Enfield Council ask TfL to attend meetings of the council's
Neighbourhood Partnerships, and how many did receive reports on the
consultation from TfL?

(9) How many meetings took place within LB Enfield between TfL and
the council as part of the consultation process?
What about with local groups in LB Enfield?

(10) What pre-consultation took place with interested parties to
ensure that the process was fair and balanced?

(11) Does the council support a MTS consultation on the Draft Mayor
of London Transport Strategy that offers so little for the driver -
private motorist or professional driver of taxi, minicab, van,
lorry or bus?
How important are private drivers in the overall use of transport
in Enfield?
Has the council expressed concerns over this unfair and unbalanced
aspect of the consultation process?

(12) Does the council support a MTS in which the promotion of
cycling within the draft MTS does not also include warnings on the
dangers of this mode?
Does the council support the proposition that a mass switch to
cycling would be beneficial justified, and on what evidence?

(13) Does the council support a MTS consultation in which costings
of various suggestions were not put forward, so that the public
could see how much tax each would entail?

(14) Does the council support a MTS consultation in which there was
no question on the level of subsidy that each mode should receive?

(15) Does the council support a MTS consultation in which no
question is asked as to whether the users of a mode should bear
all, most, some or whatever proportion of the costs of providing
that mode?

(16) What representations has or will the council make regarding
the consultation process into the Draft MTS as a result of this
enquiry or otherwise?

Yours faithfully,

Ruthlyn Black

Link to this

Enfield Council

19 January 2010

An account has been created for you with the following User ID and
password:
Email: [FOI #27060 email]
Password: lopEMeQ5

We encourage you to log in to our support site and change your
password, by clicking the following link, or pasting it into your
browser:
http://enfield-council.custhelp.com/cgi-...

===============================================================

Link to this

Enfield Council

19 January 2010

[1]Enfield Logo

Response
Dear Sir / Madam

We acknowledge your request for information received on 19/01/2010 09.12
AM

Your request has been passed to the Freedom of Information Team. This team
will contact you directly with the name and contact details of the Council
Officer responsible for handling your request.

If the information you are seeking exists, and we are not prevented from
releasing it by an exemption, the Council aim to provide you with the
information within 20 working days from receipt of your request.

Yours Sincerely
Enfield Council

Dear Sir / Madam

We acknowledge your request for information received on 19/01/2010 09.12
AM

Your request has been passed to the Freedom of Information Team. This team
will contact you directly with the name and contact details of the Council
Officer responsible for handling your request.

If the information you are seeking exists, and we are not prevented from
releasing it by an exemption, the Council aim to provide you with the
information within 20 working days from receipt of your request.

Yours Sincerely
Enfield Council

Thank you for your question. Please take a look at these Answers from our
knowledge base that might answer your question.
Discussion Thread
Customer (Ruthlyn Black) 19/01/2010 09.12 AM
Dear Enfield Council,

It has become apparent that many organisations and members of the
public in LB Enfield were not aware of the recent consultation into
the Draft Mayor of London Transport Strategy.

Please explain the steps that Enfield Council took with TfL to make
the public aware of consultation into the Draft Mayor of London
Transport Strategy.

(1) What publicity was undertaken across LB Enfield by TfL and by
LB Enfield?

(2) What was published that explained the Draft Strategy and the
consultation process and how were these made available?

(3) What steps were taken to try to ensure a balanced cross-section
of the public was made aware of the process?

(4) Where were leaflets distributed, and how was this decided?
What analysis suggested this would lead to a fair and balanced
distribution across the community?

(5) What steps were taken to ensure that hard-to-reach sections of
the community, such as those who travel exclusively by private car,
were made aware of the consultation process and encouraged to
participate in it?

(6) What consultation discussions took place between LB Enfield and
TfL over how this process would operate?
To what extent was the council consulted over the detail of the
consultation, and what views did it express?

(7) Is the council happy with the consultation process?
Was the council happy that the online questionnaire was so
flagrantly biased?
Was the council happy that were responders allowed to pick as many
as they chose from an uncosted wish-list?

(7) What steps were taken to inform and involve organisations
likely to have an interest?

(8) What programme of meetings was organised?
Did Enfield Council ask TfL to attend meetings of the council's
Neighbourhood Partnerships, and how many did receive reports on the
consultation from TfL?

(9) How many meetings took place within LB Enfield between TfL and
the council as part of the consultation process?
What about with local groups in LB Enfield?

(10) What pre-consultation took place with interested parties to
ensure that the process was fair and balanced?

(11) Does the council support a MTS consultation on the Draft Mayor
of London Transport Strategy that offers so little for the driver -
private motorist or professional driver of taxi, minicab, van,
lorry or bus?
How important are private drivers in the overall use of transport
in Enfield?
Has the council expressed concerns over this unfair and unbalanced
aspect of the consultation process?

(12) Does the council support a MTS in which the promotion of
cycling within the draft MTS does not also include warnings on the
dangers of this mode?
Does the council support the proposition that a mass switch to
cycling would be beneficial justified, and on what evidence?

(13) Does the council support a MTS consultation in which costings
of various suggestions were not put forward, so that the public
could see how much tax each would entail?

(14) Does the council support a MTS consultation in which there was
no question on the level of subsidy that each mode should receive?

(15) Does the council support a MTS consultation in which no
question is asked as to whether the users of a mode should bear
all, most, some or whatever proportion of the costs of providing
that mode?

(16) What representations has or will the council make regarding
the consultation process into the Draft MTS as a result of this
enquiry or otherwise?

Yours faithfully,

Ruthlyn Black

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be
published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[2]http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/about...

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[3][FOI #27060 email]

Is [4][Enfield Council request email] the wrong address for Freedom
of Information requests to Enfield Council? If so please contact us
using this form:
[5]http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/contact

If you find WhatDoTheyKnow useful as an FOI officer, please ask
your web manager to suggest us on your organisation's FOI page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Question Reference No100119-000000
Date Created: 19/01/2010 09.12 AM
Last Updated: 19/01/2010 09.12 AM
Status: Correspondence team

References

Visible links
2. http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/about...
3. mailto:[FOI #27060 email]
4. mailto:[Enfield Council request email]
5. http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/contact

Link to this

Enfield Council

19 January 2010


Attachment ESS 12 Acknowledgement Letter 19.01.10.pdf
27K Download View as HTML


Dear Ms Black,

Please find attached the acknowledgment letter for your Freedom of
Information request received on 19th January 2010. The officer dealing
with your request is David B Taylor, Head of Traffic and Transportation.

You should receive your response within 20 working days, however in the
meantime, should you have any queries please feel free to contact me.

Regards,

Husnara Islam
Correspondence & Complaints Officer
Environment & Street Scene Department
London Borough of Enfield
( 020 8379 3746
( 020 8379 4519
Website: www.enfield.gov.uk
Protect the Environment – Think Before You Print.

Theresa Dodd/ENV/LBE To Husnara Islam/ENV/LBE@LBE
cc
19/01/2010 09:13 Subject Fw: You have a new FOI request in the
RightNow System

Please allocate to T&T.

Thanks,

T

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: Ruthlyn Black

12 February 2010

Dear Enfield Council,

I note that the 20 working day deadline has passed without any
response being provided to my FOI Request.

This is very disappointing.

The Request was a straight forward one, and I see no reason why the
council could not provider its response within the statutory limit
of 20wd.

Please give an indication of a date by when the council expects to
provide its reply - as otherwise a reference to the ICO will become
necessary.

Yours faithfully,

Ruthlyn Black

Link to this

Enfield Council

12 February 2010

I will be out of the office starting 12/02/2010 and will not return until
17/02/2010.

If you're query is urgent please contact my colleague Peter Doherty on 020
8379 3517 regarding Members Enquiries, Corporate Complaints and Freedom of
Information Requests.

Thank You.

show quoted sections

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
www.clearswift.com
**********************************************************************

Link to this

Enfield Council

16 February 2010


Attachment UTF 8 B Rm9JMTAtRVNTLTEyICBSZXNwb25zZSAtIDE2IDAyIDIwMTAucGRm.pdf
675K Download View as HTML


Dear Ms Black

Please find attached the response to your recent Freedom of Information
request:

(See attached file: FoI10-ESS-12 Response - 16 02 2010.pdf)

David Taylor
Operations Manager, Transportation
Environment & Street Scene Department
London Borough of Enfield
( 020 8379 3576
( 020 8379 8517
Website: www.enfield.gov.uk
Protect the Environment – Think Before You Print.

show quoted sections

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
www.clearswift.com
**********************************************************************

Link to this

From: Ruthlyn Black

16 February 2010

Dear Enfield Council,

Thank you for your helpful reply.

Could you kindly provide a copy of the response that the council
sent in response to the MTS consultation?

Yours faithfully,

Ruthlyn Black

Link to this

Enfield Council

17 February 2010


Attachment 16.02.10 Response.pdf
675K Download View as HTML


Dear Ruth,

Thank you for your email below. Unfortunately, I have been out of the
office and was unable to respond to you earlier. Please note that we
received and logged your request on 19th January 2010, therefore the
response due date was 16th February 2010.

However, I have checked with the officer dealing with your request and he
informs me that a reply was sent to you via email on 16th February 2010.
Please find attached a copy of the response incase you have not received
this.

If you require any further information, please let me know.

Regards,
Husnara Islam
Correspondence & Complaints Officer
Environment & Street Scene Department
London Borough of Enfield
( 020 8379 3746
( 020 8379 4519
Website: www.enfield.gov.uk
Protect the Environment – Think Before You Print.

Ruthlyn Black To [email address]
<[FOI #27060 email]> cc
Subject Re: Freedom of Information
12/02/2010 20:48 request - Mayor of London
Transport Strategy -
Consultation Process - How
many aware within LB
Enfield?

Dear Enfield Council,

I note that the 20 working day deadline has passed without any
response being provided to my FOI Request.

This is very disappointing.

The Request was a straight forward one, and I see no reason why the
council could not provider its response within the statutory limit
of 20wd.

Please give an indication of a date by when the council expects to
provide its reply - as otherwise a reference to the ICO will become
necessary.

Yours faithfully,

Ruthlyn Black

show quoted sections

Link to this

Enfield Council

17 February 2010


Attachment UTF 8 B TVRTMi1SRVNQT05TRSBGUk9NIEVORklFTEQgLSBEUkFGVCAtIDExdGhKYW4yMDEwLnBkZg.pdf
65K Download View as HTML


As requested:

(See attached file: MTS2-RESPONSE FROM ENFIELD - DRAFT - 11thJan2010.pdf)

David Taylor
Operations Manager, Transportation
Environment & Street Scene Department
London Borough of Enfield
( 020 8379 3576
( 020 8379 8517
Website: www.enfield.gov.uk
Protect the Environment – Think Before You Print.

Ruthlyn Black
<request-27060-65
6c437e@whatdothey To
know.com> [email address]
cc
16/02/2010 20:19
Subject
Re: Freedom of Information request
- Mayor of London Transport
Strategy - Consultation Process -
How many aware within LB Enfield?

Dear Enfield Council,

Thank you for your helpful reply.

Could you kindly provide a copy of the response that the council
sent in response to the MTS consultation?

Yours faithfully,

Ruthlyn Black

show quoted sections

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Enfield Council only: