Hello! (Sign in or sign up)

Track this request

Act on what you've learnt

Similar requests

Cost of Council Website I am currently unavailable. If you have any queries, please contact Caroline McIlroy 028 90340034, [email address], Helen McBride 028 90340038, [ema... Successful.
Unusual response by Newtownabbey Borough Council to Nick McBride on 8 July 2008.
Masts July 16 2008 Recently I read an alarming report from the BBC concerning mobile phone masts which were erected after blunders by councils in Engla... Response overdue.
Request sent to Ards Borough Council by Adrian on 16 July 2008.
Masts July 16 2008 Recently I read an alarming report from the BBC concerning mobile phone masts which were erected after blunders by councils in Engla... Information not held.
Request sent to Armagh District Council by Adrian on 16 July 2008.

More similar requests

Mast

A Freedom of Information request to Newtownabbey Borough Council by Adrian

Currently overdue a response from Newtownabbey Borough Council. By law, the response had to be prompt but no later than 14 August 2008. They are 112 days late, you can complain by requesting an internal review.

Adrian

16 July 2008

July 16 2008

Dear Sir/Madam,

Recently I read an alarming report from the BBC concerning mobile
phone masts which were erected after blunders by councils in
England.

Legislation allows mobile phone companies to assume masts below 15m
in height have been given planning approval if they do not hear in
writing from a council within 56 days. The council is legally
obliged to write to the companies within the given time, outlining
whether the mast actually needs prior approval and whether or not
the council objects to its siting and appearance.

On 68 occasions, councils in southern England have fallen foul of a
legal loophole allowing masts to be approved if an operator is not
sent an answer within that set time limit. In 39 of those cases,
the council had intended to object to the application.

A catalogue of errors has been uncovered across southern England by
the BBC. They include decisions being sent by second-class mail
instead of first, letters being given the wrong date-stamp,
officers calculating the time period incorrectly, the wrong
decision notices being sent out and officers forgetting to state
clearly enough that the application had actually been refused. This
concerns this correspondent greatly.

I am therefore requesting that your council provides me with a full
disclosure on issues relating to this most serious matter under the
Freedom of Information Act 2000. I request the following specific
information:

How many instances (if at all) did your council allow masts to be
approved because an operator was not sent an answer within that set
time limit

Full details in relation to each instance (if any) as mentioned in
part one, including the size, height, and location of each mast,
the identity of the operator, and why each operator was not sent an
answer within the set time limit

Whether the council intended to object to each mast referred to in
part two

This Act established a legal right of access to information held by
public bodies and I believe the full disclosure of such material is
in the public interest and is essential for maintaining public
confidence and accountability in our local services.

I would therefore request a full disclosure in line with the
aforementioned act, within the statutory 20 day limit.

Sincerely, Adrian

Link to this | Send follow up

Lorraine Elliott
Newtownabbey Borough Council

16 July 2008

I am currently unavailable. If you have any queries, please contact Caroline McIlroy 028 90340034, [email address], Helen McBride 028 90340038, [email address] or Lisa Hall 028 90340031, [email address].

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

Things to do with this request

Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)

Adrian only: Reply to Lorraine Elliott | Request an internal review
Newtownabbey Borough Council only: Respond to request