Hello! (Sign in or sign up)

Track this request

Act on what you've learnt

Similar requests

Authorisation Dear Mr Carruthers Our ref: CS/09/122 I attach a letter in response to the request below. Yours sincerely Hilary Pook Communications & Records Man... Rejected.
Rejection by Local Government Ombudsmen to Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS on 3 December 2009.
Effectiveness Dear Mr Carruthers Our ref: CS/09/117 I attach a letter in response to the request below. Yours sincerely Hilary Pook Communications & Records Ma... Partially successful.
Some information sent by Local Government Ombudsmen to Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS on 2 December 2009.
new areas of work Dear Mr Carruthers Our ref: CS/09/107 I attach a letter from Mr Karney in response to the request below Yours sincerely Hilary Pook Communications... Awaiting internal review.
Internal review acknowledgement by Local Government Ombudsmen to Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS on 26 November 2009.

More similar requests

Event history details

Are you the owner of any commercial copyright on this page?

Lies to the Ombudsman

A Freedom of Information request to Local Government Ombudsmen by Arthur Peasgill

The request was partially successful.

Arthur Peasgill

3 November 2009

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please provide the policy of the Local Government Ombudsman (LGO)
in relation to proven lies being told to it by
Councils/officers/complainants.

Clearly Standards in Public Life require honesty and integrity from
all public servants. What is the policy of the LGO in relation to
its investigations being wilfully misled by Councils/officers?

Is any audit done by the LGO to determine as to whether any of
their investigations have been corrupted by deliberately
misleading/untruthful responses to their enquiries from
Councils/officers/complainants. If yes please provide
documentation/evidence of this.

If the LGO had definitive documentary evidence in its possession of
lies being related to its investigators or an Ombudsman what action
is dicated by policy?

Are there any policies present at the LGO to address the three
following scenarios?

A/ Proven fabricated documents being provided to the LGO by
Councils/officers/complainants that impact on the decision making
process.

B/ Proven tampered with/altered documents being provided to the LGO
by Councils/officers/complainants that impact on the decision
making process.

C/ Proven wilful or deliberate lies being told to the LGO by
Councils/officers/complainants that impact on the decision making
process.

If there any such policies, procedures or internal documentation as
regards the above please supply them.

The LGO is subject to the "Nolan" Standards in Public Life. Does
the LGO expect all public servants involved in his investigations
in any way to always tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing
but the truth? Please supply the LGO documentation and guidance in
relation to Standards in Public Life.

Yours faithfully,

Arthur Peasgill

Link to this | Send follow up

Trevor R Nunn left an annotation (4 November 2009)

Arthur,

I have done some research on this subject. Whilst I gather and collate further evidence I decided to publish the first stage of my project, the answers to my FOI requests from all councils. These can be read here,

http://ombudsmanwatchers.org.uk/evidence...

Link to this

Foi Officer
Local Government Ombudsmen

4 November 2009

Dear Mr Peasgill

Our ref: CS/09/116

This is to acknowledge receipt of your request for information, which we received on 3 November. We will respond within the 20 working day target (which would be by 1 December 2009) or, if unable to do so, we will write to you again explaining why.

Hilary Pook
Communications & Records Manager | DL: 020 7217 4734 |
Local Government Ombudsman's offfice | 10th Floor |
Millbank Tower | Millbank | London | SW1P 4QP |
www.lgo.org.uk |
|

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

Foi Officer
Local Government Ombudsmen

25 November 2009


Attachment CS 09 116 Peasgill.doc
40K Download View as HTML

Attachment CS 09 116 Examining files.doc
37K Download View as HTML

Attachment CS 09 073 members code.doc
164K Download View as HTML


Dear Mr Peasgill

Our ref: CS/09/116

I attach a letter in response to your request below, along with to documents referred to in the letter.

Yours sincerely

Hilary Pook
Communications & Records Manager | DL: 020 7217 4734 |
Local Government Ombudsman's offfice | 10th Floor |
Millbank Tower | Millbank | London | SW1P 4QP |
www.lgo.org.uk |
|

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS left an annotation (25 November 2009)

The members code attached is not valid and was not authorised by the CLAE it was imposed by Chairs Action in October 2008 when the CLAE Code on Access to Information was lost. The actual copy of the Code is available from wdtk under the Parliamentary Ombudsman who kindly provided a true copy in 2008

Link to this

A Johnson left an annotation (25 November 2009)

Download it here and compare the two documents.

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/14...

Link to this

Arthur Peasgill

22 December 2009

Dear Foi Officer,

Please conduct an internal review of this request.

I am told that the members code attached is not valid and was not
authorised by the CLAE it was imposed by Chairs Action in October
2008 when the CLAE Code on Access to Information was lost. Can the
correct Code be provided if this is correct?

I am also interested as to how the Standards of Public Life impact
on the LGO. Honesty and integrity are a vital part of these
standards. Do these standards work both ways in relation to the
LGO? By this I mean that the LGO surely doesn't lie and doesn't
expect other public authorities to lie to it. Are lies accepted by
the LGO and never investigated even if brought to their attention
whatever the circumstances? This is vitally important in the light
of the new responsibilities being given to the LGO. Does the LGO
act on lies told to it and brought to its attention during one of
its investigations? If it does not that would be a worrying state
of affairs at a so called impartial and independent public body.

This has not been addressed in your response.

Yours sincerely,

Arthur Peasgill

Link to this | Send follow up

Foi Officer
Local Government Ombudsmen

8 January 2010


Attachment CS 09 116 Peasgill review.doc
39K Download View as HTML


Dear mr Peasgill

I attach a letter from Mr Karney in response to your message below.

Yours sincerely

Hilary Pook
Communications & Records Manager | DL: 020 7217 4734 |
Local Government Ombudsman's offfice | 10th Floor |
Millbank Tower | Millbank | London | SW1P 4QP |
www.lgo.org.uk |
|

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Local Government Ombudsmen only: