Follow this request
There is 1 person following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Padmore and others
To HM Revenue and Customs by Nigel Jagger 22 July 2010
Number of taxpayers for whom Padmore was a test case
To HM Revenue and Customs by Nigel Jagger 20 August 2010
Closure Notices with no prior enquiries
To HM Revenue and Customs by Nigel Jagger 6 December 2011
Treaty claims made before 2001/2
To HM Revenue and Customs by Nigel Jagger 29 October 2009
DTA scheme settlement
To HM Revenue and Customs by Nigel Jagger 14 October 2011
List of BN66 related documents
To HM Revenue and Customs by Nigel Jagger 15 February 2010
Closure notices with no amendment
To HM Revenue and Customs by Nigel Jagger 20 May 2011
External legal opinion on DTA scheme
To HM Revenue and Customs by Nigel Jagger 15 February 2010
Scheme referred to in BN66 – key dates
To HM Revenue and Customs by Nigel Jagger 9 October 2009
Parts of the organisation involved in BN66 2008
To HM Revenue and Customs by Nigel Jagger 26 August 2009
ITH1660
Nigel Jagger made this Freedom of Information request to HM Revenue and Customs
The request was successful.
From: Nigel Jagger
26 October 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Up until recently, the HMRC International Manual contained the
following guidance:
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/ithmanual...
"The legislation is written in terms of United Kingdom residents
who are partners but some tax planners have already suggested that
it may be possible to develop the Padmore principle to apply to
other situations where there are primary and secondary taxpayers
for example where there is a trading trust with non-resident
trustees and the profits pass to a United Kingdom resident life
tenant. These further refinements will be kept under review. It has
also been suggested that the legislation has not succeeded in
overriding the treaties. Any claim to exemption connected either
with a new scheme or the effect of subsection (4) should be
referred to International Division (Double Taxation)."
Can HMRC confirm in what year this guidance first appeared in the
manual.
Yours faithfully,
Nigel Jagger
From: Request, FOI (Security Cen Pol FOI )
HM Revenue and Customs
26 October 2009
Message sent on behalf of Freedom of Information Team
The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may
be subject to legal professional privilege. Unless you are the intended
recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must
not, read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately.
HM Revenue & Customs computer systems will be monitored and communications
carried on them recorded, to secure the effective operation of the system
and for lawful purposes.
The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs are not liable for any
personal views of the sender.
This e-mail may have been intercepted and its information altered.
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
From: Nigel Jagger
24 November 2009
Dear FOI Team,
I am just writing to inform you that this request is now overdue a
response. I realise that there is very little you can do at the
moment, as the matter is in the hands of HMRC's lawyers.
I apologise if I have given the team a hard time over recent
months, and I realise you are just doing your job. If you read the
selected quotes, from the survey I presented to the Human Rights
committee below, I hope you may forgive me a little for being a bit
of a grumpy old man.
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa...
Just last week I was contacted by a chap who wanted to know if HMRC
would pursue his wife and family for the debt if he was "no longer
around". I don't know whether he was serious or not but it was very
unsettling.
I am not looking for sympathy or anything, but I hope you will
understand why I intend to keep up the pressure until this
situation is resolved one way or the other.
Regards,
Nigel Jagger
From: Sharpe, John (CenPOL)
HM Revenue and Customs
24 November 2009
Dear Mr Jagger,
I attach HMRC's response to your recent request for information.
<<2349 Jagger.pdf>>
Yours sincerely
John Sharpe
Central Policy
Freedom of Information Team
HM Revenue & Customs
Room 4/52
100 Parliament Street
London
SW1A 2BG
Tel 020 7147 2412
Fax 020 7147 0666
[1][email address]
The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may
be subject to legal professional privilege. Unless you are the intended
recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must
not, read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately.
HM Revenue & Customs computer systems will be monitored and communications
carried on them recorded, to secure the effective operation of the system
and for lawful purposes.
The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs are not liable for any
personal views of the sender.
This e-mail may have been intercepted and its information altered.
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
From: Nigel Jagger
24 November 2009
Dear Mr Sharpe,
Thank you for responding to this request.
Yours sincerely,
Nigel Jagger
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests





