Itemised spending and objective impact of Dyslexia support and literacy initiatives

Dear Mr Jones,

Thank you for your recent email. A reply will be sent to you as soon as
possible (where a response is required). For information, the
departmental standard for correspondence received is that responses
should be sent within 15 working days or 20 working days if you are
requesting information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

Your correspondence has been allocated the reference number 2008/0031797

Thank you.

Central Allocation Team

Public Communications Team

Tel: 0870 0002288
www.dcsf.gov.uk

show quoted sections

Dear Mark Jones,

I am writing to confirm that the Department has now completed its search
for the information which you requested on 10 April 2008. Your request is
very broad and I have tried to provide information which responses to the
specific points you have raised.

Children with dyslexia have benefited from the general increased funding
per pupil, which has risen from £3,370 in 1997/98 to £4,710 in 2006/07
in real terms. You asked specifically about costs of literacy initiatives
introduced since the 1997 general election. The Department is responsible
for education in England and so spending on the key initiatives, set out
in the table below, relates to England only:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Standards | 98-99 | 99-00 | 00-01 | 01-02 | 02-03 | 03-04 | 04-05 | 05-06 | 06-07 | 07-08 | 08-09 | Total |
| Fund | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |provisional| £ '000 |
|----------+--------+--------+--------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+-----------+-----------|
| Literacy |£62,700|£72,800|£84,500|£102,600|£101,200|£107,400| | | | | | £531,200 |
| Strategy | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|----------+--------+--------+--------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+-----------+-----------|
| Primary | | | | | | |£131,000|£185,000|£198,000|£206,500| £220,800 | £941,300 |
| Strategy | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|----------+--------+--------+--------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+-----------+-----------|
|Books for |£23,000|£43,000|£49,000| | | | | | | | | £115,000 |
| schools | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|(Primary) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|----------+--------+--------+--------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+-----------+-----------|
|Secondary | | |£11,000|£99,000 |£188,000|£208,000|£156,000|£158,000|£175,000|£170,675| £136,175 |£1,301,850|
|Strategy | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|(Formerly | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| KS3) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Note: All costs shown in thousands (£ 000*s)

The Government introduced the National Literacy Strategy in 1998. In
2003, the National Literacy Strategy combined with the National Numeracy
Strategy to form the Primary National Strategy. From 2004-05 to 2007-08,
the Department has allocated £720 million (with an additional provisional
allocation £220 million for 2008-09). This is allocated via the
Standards Fund to support the Primary National Strategy (formerly the
National Literacy Strategy and the National Numeracy Strategy). We are
unable to split this down to specific literacy programmes as the precise
allocations between literacy and numeracy are a matter for each local
authority taking account of local needs.

The above table shows costs for the Secondary Strategy. The Secondary
Strategy (formerly know as the KS3 Strategy) was introduced nationally in
2001 and covered the core subjects English, Maths, Science, ICT and
Foundation Subjects / Whole School Improvement, phased in over a 2 year
period, with English and Maths introduced first. It is difficult to give
a precise figure for the resources devoted specifically to English. The
costs above are principally to provide central infrastructure for LAs and
teaching and learning support programmes to schools across the
aforementioned core subjects; particularly where there was
underperformance in schools and specifically under attainment in the core
subjects with English and Maths to the fore. Therefore, the secondary
allocation cannot be hypothecated as it covers a range of subjects.

Both Strategies over the years have embedded effective teaching and
learning in primary and secondary schools through a mix of training and
materials, comprehensive development programmes for teachers and the
provision of support from local consultants. Some elements of the above
funding will go to authorities, other parts to schools. Some elements of
this funding are funded at 100% (i.e. the Department funds the entire
programme); other parts are match-funded at 50% (i.e. authorities match
fund the Department*s contribution).

Dyslexia Specific Initiatives for school age children

Along with the Dyslexia Institute (DI), WH Smith and the National Lottery
Charities Board, we supported SPELL IT, a research project looking at the
impact of structured intervention methods in relation to 7 year olds
experiencing difficulty in reading. The project reported in 2002. We gave
the DI a grant to distribute copies of the resulting readers* support pack
to parents through the DI*s network of two dozen or so regional centres.

We collaborated with the British Dyslexia Association (BDA) on the
production and dissemination of a resource pack for schools, *Achieving
dyslexia friendly schools* and *How can I tell if a child may be dyslexic
: handy hints for primary school teachers* .

Guidance issued in connection with the National Literacy and Numeracy
Strategies includes material on dyslexia : *The dyslexia friendly
classroom* and *Guidance to support pupils with dyslexia and dyscalculia*
(daily maths lesson).

In conjunction with the BDA, Dyslexia Institute and National Reading
Recovery Network, we produced and published a *Dyslexia: Pathways into
training* leaflet.

Support for the training and professional development of teachers and
other staff in SEN and disability issues was available under the SEN
component of the Standards Fund. This element is not part of the School
Development Grant. Further details of the Standard Funds since 2001 and
the current School Development Grant can be found at:
[1]http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/management/...

HM Treasury Invest to Save Budget funded research and development work
looking at the application of state of the art military jet pilot eye
tracking technology as an aid to early identification of dyslexia and
other difficulties. This work was completed in March 2004. The total
amount of funding over the period 2001-2004 was £1.224m.

We have given a grant to BDA in support of their 2004 and 2008
international conferences.

We commissioned Dr Angela Fawcett of Sheffield University (an
internationally recognised expert and writer on dyslexia) to produce three
reviews of current research on dyslexia, ordered by theme. I attach the
first of the reviews to this e-mail.

On 5 December 2007, we announced up to £3m for projects to support
improve provision for dyslexia children, further details can be found
here: [2]http://www.dfes.gov.uk/pns/DisplayPN.cgi...

I hope this provides a comprehensive list of national initiatives we have
funded. You asked for the amount spent locally, itemised by amount spent
on providing laptops, dictaphones, note-takers and so on. You
will appreciate that we seek to balance the recording and reporting burden
on schools and local authorities with ensuring we have the necessary
financial information nationally to inform future spending decisions and
that public funds are spent in accordance with the wishes of Parliament.
It would be unreasonable to expect all schools and local authorities to
itemise in their returns to the Department the amount spent on children
with dyslexia, specified by the categories you list. Given this, we do
not hold such information.

I hope this response covers the information you have requested. If
there are any specific initiatives or research that you want further
details on, or have any queries about this e-mail, please contact me.

If you are unhappy with the service you have received in relation to your
request and wish to make a complaint or request a review of our decision,
you should write to me within two calendar months of the date of
this e-mail.

If you are not content with the outcome of your complaint, you may apply
directly to the Information Commissioner for a decision. Generally, the
ICO cannot make a decision unless you have exhausted our complaints/review
procedure.

Yours

Hardip

............................................................................................................................

Hardip Begol

Deputy Director
Special Educational Needs and Disability Division
2A Caxton House, Tothill Street, London, SW1H 9NA

Tel: 020 7273 4823
[mobile number]
[3]www.dcsf.gov.uk

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

References

Visible links
1. http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/management/...
2. http://www.dfes.gov.uk/pns/DisplayPN.cgi...
3. http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/
http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/