I would like information on the age assessments on Asylum Seekers carried out by Liverpool Social Services on Asylum Seekers

It might be worth explicitly asking for the information to be sent to you in electronic format via your @whatdotheyknow.com email address, if you wish for the information requested to be accessible online to one an all.

I have started to use a standard paragraph to requests such as:

"Please provide the requested information, via email in electronic format, to my @whatdotheyknow.com address, in the original MS Word or plain text format if available, or alternatively in PDF format, only if MS Word or plain text formats are not available. If you
only have paper (hard copy) copies please provide a Digital Photo Copier Scanned version in PDF format. This will help ensure the information is accessible for use with a Screen Reader or Magnifier. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screen_reader>"
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ua...

Related info:

"Liverpool Council has agreed to pay
Miss T £5,000 in recognition of this
injustice and to review a sample of
10 per cent of its age assessments
of unaccompanied asylum-seeking children."

---
Liverpool Council mishandled age assessment for child asylum seeker

Full text report can be downloaded via:
* Report 08 005 858 Liverpool City C (963KB)
http://www.lgo.org.uk/GetAsset.aspx?id=f...

Date Published: 01/04/10

Liverpool City Council failed to follow long-established guidance when social workers who had no specific training assessed the age of an unaccompanied asylum-seeking girl.

Liverpool City Council failed to follow long-established guidance when social workers who had no specific training assessed the age of an unaccompanied asylum-seeking girl, finds Local Government Ombudsman, Anne Seex. In her report, issued today (1 April 2010) she says: “As a consequence of being assessed as an adult … a child of 15 suffered the injustice of being denied for more than 15 months the local authority care and support that she needed.”

‘Miss T’ (real names are not given for legal reasons) is a citizen of the Cameroon. She arrived in Liverpool and claimed asylum as a child. The Home Office asked the Council to assess her for age. The Council’s age assessment of Miss T omitted important aspects and then failed to give adequate reasons for its decision that she was over 18 and so not entitled to support and services as a child in need.

A later, properly-conducted assessment by a different council assessed Miss T as being 16. This assessment was proven to be accurate by official papers subsequently obtained from her country of origin. By this time she had been without care services for over 15 months, was pregnant and receiving therapy for sexual abuse and having been subjected to witchcraft practices.

The Ombudsman found faults in the way that the Council conducted the assessment:

* Miss T’s ethnicity, culture and customs were not a key focus;
* the assessors did not consider whether a medical opinion might have been helpful when Miss T claimed to be under 15 and the assessors thought she could be as old as 23;
* no consideration was given to whether other professional input was needed;
* apparent inconsistencies in Miss T’s story appear to have influenced the judgement without her having the opportunity to clarify matters; and
* the assessors speculated about matters but did not ask Miss T for further information.

Miss T suffered the injustice of:

* loss of care services that she needed and was entitled to receive; and
* stress and uncertainly while she was a child in making appeals against decisions to deport her.

The Ombudsman found maladministration causing injustice and is pleased that, in accordance with her recommendations, the Council has agreed to pay Miss T £5,000 in recognition of this injustice and to review a sample of 10 per cent of its age assessments of unaccompanied asylum-seeking children.

Report ref no 08 005 85
http://www.lgo.org.uk/news/2010/apr/live...
---