Make and explore Freedom of Information requestsFollow this request
There are 2 people following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Significant Case Failings - Definition and Statistics, Please
To Office of the Legal Services Complaints Commissioner by Spenser Poultney 9 May 2009
Significant Case Failings - definition and statistics
To Office of the Legal Services Ombudsman by Spenser Poultney 20 April 2009
Cost of Family Justice System
To Ministry of Justice by Avril Williams 28 May 2011
AN ORAL REVIEW PLAN re: RESTRUCTURE & RESOLUTION OF ISSUES
To Civil Justice Council by Julie Shrive (Account suspended) 12 July 2009
ETHICAL BEHAVIOR from JUDICIARY?
To Office for Judicial Complaints by Julie Shrive (Account suspended) 5 June 2009
FRAUD - DELIBERATE LOSS OF EVIDENCE ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE
To Social Security Advisory Committee by Julie Shrive (Account suspended) 22 June 2009
CIVIL LIBERTIES ABUSE ??!!DEMOCRATIC??!!
To Information Commissioner’s Office by Julie Shrive (Account suspended) 6 July 2009
Credit card fees – Local Authorities' payments
To Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service by Neil Gilliatt 21 August 2011
URGENT LCO needed for FAIR HEARING due to fraud committed
To Ministry of Justice by Julie Shrive (Account suspended) 4 July 2009
DISCRETION
To Ministry of Justice by Julie Shrive (Account suspended) 15 May 2009
HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE
Julie Shrive (Account suspended) made this Freedom of Information request to Office of the Legal Services Complaints Commissioner
Waiting for an internal review by Office of the Legal Services Complaints Commissioner of their handling of this request.
From: Julie Shrive (Account suspended)
14 June 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Since public official complaints have been maladministrated by call
centres since 1996 likewise legal issues .
Please explain who legal is oveseeing the behaviour in the
administrative Courts , Appeals and Tribunals Service as the Office
of Justice Commissioner and Ministry of Justice don't know neither
see the serious implication?That the courts are not operating
legally .Please explain how you will address this for everyone and
the civil liberties abuse I have endured as well as the the
solicitor took £2000 for litigation to just file my papers which i
never wanted doing. And the Royal Courts of Justice deliberate
destruction of 13years work .This is second time . Who is going to
compensate? NB My requests on whatdotheydoforyou site.
Yours faithfully,
Julie Shrive
From: OLSCC Team
Office of the Legal Services Complaints Commissioner
16 June 2009
[Subject only] RE: Freedom of Information request - HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE
show quoted sections
From: Julie Shrive (Account suspended)
16 June 2009
Dear OLSCC Team,
Isn't this a poor show when you don't regard the above question as
serious. Do you think I haven't contacted who you say . The HMCS
caused the problem . How stupid to think they would address. Just
look at my requests . Typical .I bet the taxpayer is paying for you
to do this. Surely not legal ? What is going on? Anarchy? I
therefore request Internal review.
Ms J Shrive
16 June 2009
Dear Ms Shrive
Thank you for your e-mail of 14 June 2009.
Your request for information relating to the Administrative courts
and Appeals and Tribunals service will not be will not be dealt
with under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Nor can it be
answered by the Office of the Legal Services Complaints
Commissioner as we do not hold the information you require.
You may wish to contact Her Majesty's Court Service and the
Tribunals Service, please see below contact details:
Her Majesty's Court Service www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk
Tribunals Service www.tribunalsservice.gov.uk
The Legal Services Complaints Commissioner was appointed by the
Lord Chancellor as an independent regulator of the complaints
handling functions of The Law Society, as discharged by the Legal
Complaints Service and the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
Your request has been miss-directed but we hope that the Courts
Service and the Tribunals Service will be able to assist you.
Yours sincerely
Sam Smith
Corporate Services
Yours sincerely,
Julie Shrive
From: OLSCC Team
Office of the Legal Services Complaints Commissioner
16 June 2009
[Subject only] RE: Internal review of Freedom of Information request - HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE
show quoted sections
From: Julie Shrive (Account suspended)
20 June 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Yet again I have been to these organizations many times and they
refer back to everyone else . Do you not have the professionalism
to find out as I can't ? Isn't it serious when legal system acting
illegally with home and cabinet offices complying??!
Yours sincerely,
Julie Shrive
Julie Shrive (Account suspended) left an annotation (23 June 2009)
Obviously this Ben Jones is not impartial and democratic & has infiltrated a system that does not resolve .He thinks FOI is facts and figure when way they maladministrate and are unethical is far more important/serious complied with by him who should remain objective.
From: OLSCC Team
Office of the Legal Services Complaints Commissioner
23 June 2009
[Subject only] RE: Freedom of Information request - HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE
show quoted sections
From: Julie Shrive (Account suspended)
24 June 2009
Dear OLSCC Team,
Negligence another rip off organisation we are paying for .So
requestinternal review?
Yours sincerely,
Julie Shrive
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Ben Jones left an annotation (16 June 2009)
Again you are failing to distinguish between a Freedom of Information request, and a letter where you are asking for comments to be made on government policy. When a department advises you that they are not answering your letter under the terms of the Freedom of Information aCT THEY ARE NOT ATTEMPTING TO AVOID ANSWERING, THEY ARE SIMPLY STATING THAT YUOr letter does can not be described as a request for information.
They then try and be helpful and steer you towards the correct department but again you miss the point and think they are avoiding the answer.
You would not expect a teacher of lets say German to mark a Applied Physics A level paper, so why do you expect a public authority to answer a request which does covers information which falls outside of it's policy area.
Link to this