How reliable/fair are local Government Ombudsman's Investigations

Theresa Ezekpo made this Freedom of Information request to Local Government Ombudsmen

Local Government Ombudsmen did not have the information requested.

From: Theresa Ezekpo

13 June 2010

Dear Local Government Ombudsmen,

Please can you provide me with the following information under the
Freedom Of Information Act 2000:-

1. Explanation of all the steps that the local government ombudsman
takes to verify and ensure that information received from council
officers are accurate/true.

2. The criteria your organisation use to decide whether or not
statements made by council officers are true or false.

3. The criteria your organisation use to decide whether or not
statements made by complainants are true or false.

4. The characteristics of things that your organisation consider to
be concrete evidence that a council officer has lied or made false
statements.

5. Whether or not maladministration includes situations when there
is evidence that council officers have told lies or made false
statements.

5. What your organisation does when it is presented with concrete
evidence that council officers) had lied or made false statements
about:

a. a complainant

b. a situation/event.

6. What your office does when it finds that a council officer has
told lies or made false statements about:

a. council employee(s)

b. Camden resident(s)

c. Council tenant(s)

7 The distinguishes between telling lies and giving out false
information about:

a. individuals

b. the council(s)

c. events/situations.

I would be grateful if you could send me your full reply within the
usual 20 days time limit.

Yours faithfully,

Theresa Ezekpo

Link to this

Trevor R Nunn left an annotation (13 June 2010)

I was told by a Local Government Ombudsman investigator based at the York office that they have NO reason to doubt anything told them by a council officer.

http://ombudsmanwatchers.org.uk/evidence...

A Local Government Assistant Ombudsman refused to investigate my complaint based on the what they were told by a council officer without any prudent validation.

http://lgowatcher.blogspot.com/2009/01/l...

A later finding of maladministration proved the council officer had misled the Assistant Ombudsman, the Ombudsman did nothing about it.

It would appear the mindset of those working in the Local Government Ombudsman's office is that a council officer never lies but complainant usually do. If a council officer is ever caught out lying, a very rare occurrence with the Local Government Ombudsman, they usually excuse it as an oversight. Which is understandable when you realise that the majority of staff involved in investigating complaints are ex council.

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/12...

For the truth about Local Government Ombudsmen visit my blog

http://lgowatcher.blogspot.com/

Link to this

Trevor R Nunn left an annotation (13 June 2010)

Further to my previous annotation, I suggest you validate the response you receive from the Ombudsman before accepting it as the truth.

http://lgowatcher.blogspot.com/2009/11/l...

http://lgowatcher.blogspot.com/2010/06/w...

http://lgowatcher.blogspot.com/2009/07/t...

http://lgowatcher.blogspot.com/2009/10/l...

For more examples use 'search this blog' here

http://lgowatcher.blogspot.com/

Link to this

From: Foi Officer
Local Government Ombudsmen

15 June 2010

Dear Ms Ezekpo

Our ref: CS/10/060

This is to acknowledge receipt of your request below received on 14 June. We will respond within the 20 working day target (which would be by 12 July 2010) or, if unable to do so, we will write to you again explaining why.

Yours sincerely

Hilary Pook
Communications & Records Manager | DL: 020 7217 4734 |
Local Government Ombudsman's office | 10th Floor |
Millbank Tower | Millbank | London | SW1P 4QP |
www.lgo.org.uk |

show quoted sections

Link to this

Trevor R Nunn left an annotation (16 June 2010)

I can also answer one of your questions by relating to my own experience.

[Question (5?) What your organisation does when it is presented with concrete evidence that council officers had lied or made false statements about:

a. a complainant

b. a situation/event.]

Based on council officers lying and making false statements about me and my complaints on numerous occasions over a period of 12 years;

a. nothing.

b. nothing.

Over the last five years the LGO will have received over 80,000 complaints. The majority of which are complaints against one of the 400 or so Councils in England. Yet not one of these complaints led to the LGO criticising a council member of staff for lying or misleading them during an investigation. I call that a statistical impossibility.

http://ombudsmanwatchers.org.uk/evidence...

Link to this

From: Foi Officer
Local Government Ombudsmen

30 June 2010


Attachment CS 10 060 Ezekpo.doc
43K Download View as HTML


Dear Ms Ezekpo

I attach a letter in response to your request below.

Yours sincerely

Hilary Pook
Communications & Records Manager | DL: 020 7217 4734 |
Local Government Ombudsman's office | 10th Floor |
Millbank Tower | Millbank | London | SW1P 4QP |
www.lgo.org.uk |

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: Theresa Ezekpo

3 July 2010

Dear Foi Officer,

Thank you for your reply and for referring me to information on
your website.

However, after examining the information that you had referred me
to, I felt that I should clarify my request for the following
reasons:

The information on your website does not include those that I am
seeking from you and leads me to suspect that you may have
misunderstood my request;

The information on your website is generally about the types and
sources of information that you can obtain from the council;

My questions are essentially referring to the stage after the
ombudsman has obtained and examined information (ie various
documents and statements) from the council and hears that they are
incomplete and/or different from the information he/she had
obtained from the complainant;

My request is also asking for a clear definition, description and
illustrative examples of what the ombudsman would accept as
concrete evidence that a council officer has lied.

For example, what would the ombudsman accept as concrete proof that
the council has misinformed third parties including the ombudsman
by:

1. Supplying distorted/falsified information
(including documents, verbal or written statements) about a
complainant;

2. Removing, hiding or destroying pertinent information (including
documents, file notes, audio tapes, memos and/or emails) from the
complainant's files

I hope that this clarification of my request will help you to
identify and supply me with the information that I had requested
for.

Please feel free to ask me for further clarification of my request
if necessary.

If you are still not able or willing to supply the information that
I had requested for, then please confirm this within the next seven
days so that I can request for an internal review of your response.

I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Yours sincerely,

Theresa Ezekpo

Link to this

From: Foi Officer
Local Government Ombudsmen

6 July 2010


Attachment image001.jpg
2K Download


Dear Ms Ezekpo

Thank you for your email of 3 July.

I shall ensure that the FOI Officer sees this on her return from leave
next week.

Yours sincerely

Rob Rundle

Publicity & Information Assistant | DL: 020 7217 4686 |

10th Floor | Millbank Tower | Millbank | London | SW1P 4QP |

[1]LGO 4 col SML at 70%

Website: [2]www.lgo.org.uk

     Dear Foi Officer,

    

     Thank you for your reply and for referring me to information on

     your website.

    

     However, after examining the information that you had referred me

     to, I felt that I should clarify my request for the following

     reasons:

    

     The information on your website does not include those that I am

     seeking from you and leads me to suspect that you may have

     misunderstood my request;

    

     The information on your website is generally about the types and

     sources of information that you can obtain from the council;

    

     My questions are essentially referring to the stage after the

     ombudsman has obtained and examined information (ie various

     documents and statements) from the council and hears that they
are

     incomplete and/or different from the information he/she had

     obtained from the complainant;

    

     My request is also asking for a clear definition, description and

     illustrative examples of what the ombudsman would accept as

     concrete evidence that a council officer has lied.

    

     For example, what would the ombudsman accept as concrete proof
that

     the council has misinformed third parties including the ombudsman

     by:

    

     1. Supplying distorted/falsified information

     (including documents, verbal or written statements) about a

     complainant;

    

     2. Removing, hiding or destroying pertinent information
(including

     documents, file notes, audio tapes, memos and/or emails) from the

     complainant's files

    

     I hope that this clarification of my request will help you to

     identify and supply me with the information that I had requested

     for.

    

     Please feel free to ask me for further clarification of my
request

     if necessary.

    

     If you are still not able or willing to supply the information
that

     I had requested for, then please confirm this within the next
seven

     days so that I can request for an internal review of your
response.

    

     I look forward to hearing from you soon.

    

     Yours sincerely,

    

     Theresa Ezekpo

    

    

show quoted sections

Link to this

George Cant left an annotation (10 July 2010)

Very interesting questions Theresa Ezekpo

They will try not to answer these, its important that you push them to answer.

Understanding what they use/agree is valid evidence is a question that a lot of complainants are left asking.

Link to this

Anne Hide left an annotation (10 July 2010)

The simple answer to your request

"How reliable/fair are local Government Ombudsman's Investigations"? Is

Local Government Ombudsman's investigations are neither reliable nor fair.

Accordingly they will find it impossible to answer your questions without obfuscating their response in an attempt to hide the truth.

Link to this

From: Foi Officer
Local Government Ombudsmen

20 July 2010


Attachment CS 10 060 Ezekpo 2.doc
43K Download View as HTML

Attachment 00FOI complaints CS.doc
33K Download View as HTML


Dear Ms Ezekpo

I attach a letter in response to your email below.

Yours sincerely

Hilary Pook
Communications & Records Manager | DL: 020 7217 4734 |
Local Government Ombudsman's office | 10th Floor |
Millbank Tower | Millbank | London | SW1P 4QP |
www.lgo.org.uk |

show quoted sections

Link to this

Trevor R Nunn left an annotation (20 July 2010)

FOI only allows access to recorded information, not opinion, what you should ask for is a list of all the recorded instances in which the Ombudsman has actually found that a council officer has lied, fabricated evidence etc (use your full list). I think you will find any such instances few and far between or you will get the usual we can't tell you section 44 exemption nonsense.

http://ombudsmanwatchers.org.uk/evidence...

Link to this

From: Theresa Ezekpo

21 July 2010

Dear Foi Officer,

Thank you for your reply.

It is unfortunate that you are not able to give me the information
for which I had requested on this occasion.

Yours sincerely,

Theresa Ezekpo

Link to this

George Cant left an annotation (21 July 2010)

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/st...

That may get a more meaningful answer.

Link to this

Karen White left an annotation (30 March 2011)

Kensington and Chelsea Council TMO, Kensal Road, W10 needs to be investigated. They should be named as the number one liars when it comes to lying to the OMBUDSMAN. This include Customer Relations Managers supported by senior members of staff including Chief Executive.

They do not take ownership for anything, instead they will make your life more hell after you log a complaint and you will start receiving letters threatening you with eviction for one weeks water charge less than £5.00 per week.

They will even create fictitious works orders and emails to cover their track.

Shame on you Kensington and Chelsea TMO

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Local Government Ombudsmen only: