Make and explore Freedom of Information requestsFollow this request
There is 1 person following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
How many cases of Children being taken from parent/Guardian following maliciously reported false allegations of neglect or abuse have been identified by Department for Children, Schools and Families in the whole of the UK.
To Department for Children, Schools and Families by Peter Burke 19 October 2009
Welfare Checklist (PLO) 2008 introduced to ensure children are placed with relatives rather than in care
To Salford City Council by Mrs L Taylor (Account suspended) 14 October 2009
Further call for HE evidence
To Salford City Council by S Tyler 7 October 2009
Education Supply Staff
To Salford City Council by Hannah Fraser 29 June 2010
Alleged Campaigns
To Salford City Council by stephen gregory 23 January 2010
Institutional abuse and Evictions of Care Home Residents
To Salford City Council by Doug Paulley 25 June 2010
School Admission Appeal Process
To Salford City Council by D. Cartledge 24 June 2010
Adoptions
To Salford City Council by Melizza Moore 23 June 2010
UASC Costs template (PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE SUBJECT LINE)
To Salford City Council by Ms T Potter 18 July 2009
Impact of proposed home education legislation
To Salford City Council by C. Blades 20 September 2009
How many cases of Children being taken from parent / Guardian following maliciously reported false allegations of neglect or abuse have been identified by Salford Children's Services ?
Peter Burke made this Freedom of Information request to Salford City Council
The request was successful.
From: Peter Burke
19 October 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
How many cases of Children being taken from parent / Guardian
following maliciously reported false allegations of neglect or
abuse have been identified by Salford Children's Services.
What is the usual procedure adopted by by Salford Children's
Services for this kind of scenario, when social workers make these
kind of mistakes ?
Yours faithfully,
Peter Burke
From: Egerton, Paula
Salford City Council
21 October 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Dear Mr Burke,
I acknowledge your request for information below.
We will endeavour to respond to your request within 20 working days according to the Act. However, please be advised that if an exemption applies to the information requested then this period may be exceeded again in accordance with the provisions of the Act.
A charge may be applicable in order for us to fulfill your request. You will be advised of this in due course if necessary. If a charge is made, the clock will stop in respect of the 20 working days until the fee is received. Should you have any queries, please contact me using the contact details above.
Regards
Paula Egerton
Salford Children's Services
-
show quoted sections
From: Egerton, Paula
Salford City Council
6 December 2009
Please find attached our response to your recent request under the Freedom of Information Act
Salford Children's Services
DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
As a public body, Salford City Council may be required to disclose this email [or any response to it] under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, unless the information in it is covered by one of the exemptions in the Act.
Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error.
For the full disclaimer please access http://www.salford.gov.uk/e-mail. Thank you.
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Peter Burke left an annotation (22 October 2009)
I believe that this data requested is of public interest and is data that ought to be published without request being made, in the interests of transparency. As such it is my opiniion that it would be improper to charge for such data. I hope that others may also comment on this point as well.
Link to this