Follow this request
There is 1 person following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Stockport Council says every approach I make to the Council must be through the FOI Officer
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 27 February 2010
Concerns about exposure of 550 young children to high levels of CO2
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 13 January 2010
Yet another banned council taxpayer
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 26 April 2010
Independent review of refusals
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 17 July 2010
Communications between the District Auditor and the Council regarding the Harcourt Street school
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 3 May 2010
Reasons for not using the Fir Tree site
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 17 July 2010
Escalating costs - were correct finanacial procedures followed by Stockport Council regarding the Harcourt Street School?
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 13 January 2010
Primary capital programme - was PRINCE2 applied to the Harcourt Street development?
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 11 July 2010
Changing of the Fir Tree Nursery to a nursery class
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 3 December 2010
Has the promised outreach work for the deprived Fir Tree area been costed for the 25 year lifetime of the proposed Harcourt Street School?
Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) made this Freedom of Information request to Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
The request was refused by Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council.
From: Sheila Oliver (Account suspended)
17 January 2010
Dear Stockport Borough Council,
At the consultation with Fir Tree Primary governors dated 6th July
2005, concern was express by them that families in the Fir Tree
area will have difficulty getting to the proposed new Harcourt
Street school site. The governors felt that the outreach work would
need to be increased, as it was felt that parents from the school
would not walk to the new facilities. The Governors supported a new
school but wanted the site to be in the Fir Tree community. Please
may I see any documents regarding how much has this outreach work
been costed at over the 25 year lifetime of the proposed school?
Yours faithfully,
Sheila Oliver
From: FOI Officer
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
25 January 2010
Dear Mrs Oliver,
I am writing in response to your request for information below (ref 2589).
As you have previously been informed, your requests for information about
Harcourt Street are considered to be vexatious under section 14(1) Freedom
of Information Act 2000 and manifestly unreasonable under Regulation
12(4)(b) Environmental Information Regulations 2004 and will not receive a
response. This decision has been through the Council's internal review
process and was upheld. It has also been investigated by the Information
Commissioner's Office at your request; the ICO upheld the Council's
decision in its Decision Notice.
Yours sincerely,
Claire Naven
Claire Naven
Data Protection & Freedom of Information Officer
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
show quoted sections
From: Sheila Oliver (Account suspended)
17 February 2010
Dear Stockport Borough Council,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of Stockport Borough
Council's handling of my FOI request 'Has the promised outreach
work for the deprived Fir Tree area been costed for the 25 year
lifetime of the proposed Harcourt Street School?'.
Please note that the Information Commission Team Leader has stated
to me in a letter dated 15/2/10:-
... "Notice relates specifically to the request you made on 1st
December 2008 and does not make any finding regarding future
requests. If you have made further requests and these have been
refused you should ask the Council to review their requests and if
following this review you remain unhappy with their response you
can bring a new complaint to the Commissioner."
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ha...
Yours faithfully,
Sheila Oliver
From: FOI Officer
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
19 February 2010
Dear Mrs Oliver,
I am writing in response to your email below (ref 2589).
As we have previously explained to you on a number of occasions, the
Council has already carried out an internal review of its decision to
refuse all your requests on the subject of Harcourt Street on the grounds
that they are vexatious and manifestly unreasonable. Your subsequent
complaint has also been investigated by the Information Commissioner's
Office which issued a Decision Notice and upheld the Council's decision.
On this basis, the Council will not be carrying out an internal review as
it has nothing further to add.
If you wish to pursue a complaint you are entitled to complain to the
Information Commissioner's Office: [1]www.ico.gov.uk.
Yours sincerely,
Claire Naven
Claire Naven
Data Protection & Freedom of Information Officer
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
show quoted sections
From: Sheila Oliver (Account suspended)
22 February 2010
Dear FOI Officer,
Since the far from impartial internal review process at Stockport
Council, the Council has been forced to disclose documents to a
public inquiry which show the entire site to be highly contaminated
and that £5 million in funding is not available, contrary to their
previous assertion - they only disclosed those facts after the ICO
ruling. The Information Commission has said twice that the Council
needs to answer questions on this subject. One has to wonder what
the Council has to hide. I shall make a complaint to the ICO about
this matter.
Yours sincerely,
Sheila Oliver
Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) left an annotation (24 March 2010)
"Council bosses decided NOT to hold a wide-ranging investigation into the death of a boy who died after an asthma attack at school, the MEN can reveal.
Stockport council officials considered carrying out a serious case review into the 11-year-old's death THREE times – but each time decided against.
The news came after an inquest jury found a catalogue of errors and neglect by staff at Offerton High School 'significantly contributed' to Sam's death.
He was left to sit in a corridor after suffering the attack while teachers failed to call an ambulance.
Parents Paul and Karen Linton are now considering legal action against the council.
The M.E.N understands officials in charge of safeguarding Stockport children did not believe the case met the criteria for a full serious case review...."
Manchester Evening News
The same people responsible for the above are the ones refusing to answer questions about this school to be built on toxic waste. The Information Commission has said the next step is to lodge an official complaint with Stockport Council about their refusal to respond, but the Complaints Officer won't even reply.
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests






Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) left an annotation (26 January 2010)
The Council was told on 14/01/10 by a senior Information Commission complaints officer that I could ask questions on this subject.
I shall be taking this matter to Mr. Thomas, Information Commissioner, himself.
Stockport Council has a lot to conceal, but I shall expose what they are trying to cover up. It doesn't matter how long it takes.
Link to this