functions council

Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS made this Freedom of Information request to Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council

Waiting for an internal review by Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council of their handling of this request.

From: Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS

24 August 2008

Dear Sir or Madam,

Sirs

I would like to know the average proportion of time the elected
representatives of your authority spend as part of their duties for
2005/2006, 2006/2007 and 2007/2008 on their main activities. The
activities that form their duties (employment) as an elected
representative are:

1 directly resolving complaints against the executive (Council
Staff) of the Council by residents;
2 sitting on committee's;
3 acting for the political parties that they represent and/or
ceremonial duties (i.e. all time not spent on sitting on a
Committee or resolving a complaint against the executive);

The total time spent by an elected representative for a Council on
these three activities should be 100 per cent of the time they
spend 'working for a Council' as an elected representative.

I would additionally like to know how much in total was paid to
local councillors to meet all their duties (including expenses) for
2005/2006, 2006/2007 and 2007/2008 by your authority, and how many
elected representatives are (and were) represented on your
authority for these years.

I would also like to know how many Complaints in total were
submitted to your Council in 2005/2006, 2006/2007 and 2007/2008 for
each year. I would further like to know how many of these
complaints were formally considered by an elected representative
for each of these years.

I would further like to know how many complaints against the
Executive (Council staff) led to the elected representatives
formally identifying that the Executive had acted wrongly for the
years 2005/2006, 2006/2007 and 2007/2008, and how many of these
formal determinations by the elected representatives identify that
there was no wrong-doing by the Executive. How many staff employed
by your authority in 2005/2006, 2006/2007 and 2007/2008 ceased to
be employed by your authority as a direct result of a complaint
against the Executive, and the Councillors identifying this to be
the case.

I would further like to know how much money the Council has paid to
a complainant (i.e. victim of a Council's wrongdoing) through its
own complaints system (i.e. excluding any intervention by the Local
Government Ombudsman, Valuation Tribunal or similar body) in
2005/2006, 2006/2007 and 2007/2008.

I would like to know how much money either in the form of local
settlement or additional formal finding of maladministration
causing injustice the Local Government Ombudsman has recommended
that your Council pay in 2005/2006, 2006/2007 and 2007/2008 (for
each year) and if the Local Government Ombudsman's recommendations
have been met in full (including any non-financial recommendations
for each year)). Please detail any recommendation that has not been
met in full and provide a copy of the Elected representatives
decision. Please additionally identify if these costs were met
directly by Council Tax Payers or the Council's insurers (excluding
self insurance by a Council)

Finally, please provide details of the financial cost of
administering all your complaints systems (including FoI and DP) by
the Executive for 2005/2006, 2006/2007 and 2007/2008 and the number
of staff employed in administering complaints and resolving these
(Full time equivalent staffing levels). Please also provide details
of your total administrative costs for 2005/2006, 2006/2007 and
2007/2008 and the total number of staff employed by your authority,
as well as any pay increase (including increments) made to the
Council's Chief Executive (Head of Paid Service) in pounds sterling
for each of these years. Please additionally identify if the Chief
Executives wages included performance related payments.

If you do not have this reasonably basic management information
related to complaints and/or identify that the costs of accessing
the information requested will be more than £450 please state this
and identify that your Authority does not have either a functioning
or accountable complaints system, and does not maintain any basic
management information related to this issue.

If you have a complaints system not fit for purpose please identify
which political party currently controls your Council, and if this
political party has appointed the current Electoral Registration
and Returning Officer through its control of the Council (with date
of their formal appointment). Please name the current Electoral
Registration and Returning Officer, and identify if they are also
Head of Paid Service, and Clerk to your Authority. Please
additionally provide any documentation maintained by your Local
Authorities Head of Paid Service identifying that they personally
do not believe it to be appropriate for your Council to have a
complaints system that is fit for purpose. This documentation
should be in existence due to the provisions of s4 of the Local
Government Act 1989.

Yours faithfully

Stuart HARDWICKE CARRUTHERS

Link to this

From: Mailbox Council
Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council

26 August 2008

Your email has been forwarded to the appropriate section who will reply to you directly, thanks

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: Sue Hill
Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council

27 August 2008


Attachment image001.jpg
6K Download


Performance & Development

Head of Service

Pam Smith

SERVICE UNIT

Data Protection & Freedom of Information

Service address:

Floor 10
PO Box 39, Municipal Offices,

Smith Street, Rochdale OL16 1LQ.

Tel: (01706) 925005

Fax: (01706) 925386

Email:[email address]

Web site: [1]www.rochdale.gov.uk

Your ref:

Our Ref: 739.08

Enquiries: Catherine White

Date: 27/08/08

Dear Stuart Hardwicke Carruthers,

RE: - REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

I acknowledge with thanks your request for information held by Rochdale
Metropolitan Borough Council.

I write to advise to you that your request is being considered.

Please be advised that a charge may be applicable for your request. We
will advise you of this in due course.

Should you have any queries, please contact me on the number above.

Yours sincerely,

Catherine White

Data Protection & Freedom of Information Manager.

This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and may also
be legally privileged. They are intended solely for the intended
addressee. If you are not the addressee please e-mail it back to
the sender and then immediately, permanently delete it. Do not
read, print, re-transmit, store or act in reliance on it. This e-
mail may be monitored by Rochdale Council in accordance with
current regulations. This footnote also confirms that this e-mail
message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses
currently known to the Council. However, the recipient is
responsible for virus-checking before opening this message and any
attachment. Unless otherwise stated, any views expressed in this
message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily
reflect the views of Rochdale Council.

As a public body, the Council may be required to disclose this
email and/or any response under the Freedom of Information Act
2000 unless the information in the email and/or any response is
covered by one of the exemptions in the Act.

References

Visible links
1. http://www.rochdale.gov.uk/

Link to this

From: Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS

28 September 2008

Dear Sue Hill,

response overdue

Yours sincerely,

Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS

Link to this

From: Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS

17 December 2008

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Rochdale Borough
Council's handling of my FOI request 'functions council'.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/fu...

Yours sincerely,

Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS

Link to this

From: Mailbox Council
Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council

18 December 2008

Thankyou for your email, I have passed it to the appropriate section and
asked that they reply to you direct.

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: Sue Hill
Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council

16 January 2009


Attachment image001.jpg
6K Download


Performance & Development

Head of Service

Pam Smith

SERVICE UNIT

Data Protection & Freedom of Information

Service Address:

RMBC

Telegraph House

Floor 6

Baille Street

Rochdale

OL16 1JH

Tel: (01706) 925005

Fax: (01706) 925386

Email:[email address]

Web site: [1]www.rochdale.gov.uk

Your ref:

Our Ref: 874.09

Enquiries: Catherine White

Date: 16/01/09

Dear Stuart Hardwicke Carruthers,

RE: - REQUEST FOR INTERNAL REVIEW

I acknowledge with thanks your request for information held by Rochdale
Metropolitan Borough Council.

I write to advise to you that your request is being considered.

Should you have any queries, please contact me on the number above.

Yours sincerely,

Catherine White

Data Protection & Freedom of Information Manager.

This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and may also
be legally privileged. They are intended solely for the intended
addressee. If you are not the addressee please e-mail it back to
the sender and then immediately, permanently delete it. Do not
read, print, re-transmit, store or act in reliance on it. This e-
mail may be monitored by Rochdale Council in accordance with
current regulations. This footnote also confirms that this e-mail
message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses
currently known to the Council. However, the recipient is
responsible for virus-checking before opening this message and any
attachment. Unless otherwise stated, any views expressed in this
message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily
reflect the views of Rochdale Council.

As a public body, the Council may be required to disclose this
email and/or any response under the Freedom of Information Act
2000 unless the information in the email and/or any response is
covered by one of the exemptions in the Act.

References

Visible links
1. http://www.rochdale.gov.uk/

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council only: