Follow this request

There are 3 people following this request

Follow by email

RSS feed of updates

Act on what you've learnt

Tweet this request

Start your own blog

Get help investigating

Write to your politician

Pledge with others

Similar requests

FUNCTION OF THE TCC COURT

fred robinson (Account suspended) made this Freedom of Information request to Ministry of Justice

Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, Ministry of Justice should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.

From: fred robinson (Account suspended)

8 March 2009

Dear Sir or Madam,

I request under the freedom of information act that you confirm or
deny the TCC court is the correct court to deal with a personal
injury claim arising from a broken window.

Yours faithfully,

fred robinson

Link to this

Ministry of Justice

8 March 2009

attachment.delivery status
0K Download

Freedom of Information request FUNCTION OF THE TCC COURT.txt
2K Download View as HTML

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

Delivery to the following recipients failed.

general.queries+AEA-justice.gsi.gov.uk

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: fred robinson (Account suspended)

13 March 2009

Dear Sir or Madam,

YOUR RESPONSE:

Received: from DCASBBPEXB01.aramismsg.dca.local ([10.100.104.11])
by DCASBBPEXM02.aramismsg.dca.local with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Sun, 8 Mar 2009 05:04:44 +0000
thread-index: Acmfq2WxmFst0+Z9T2iDQAOWFa+uOA==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2826
Received: from mx.hosting-w.gsi.gov.uk ([51.63.241.43]) by
DCASBBPEXB01.aramismsg.dca.local with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 8 Mar 2009 05:04:44 +0000
Received: from mail89.messagelabs.com ([194.106.220.3]) by
mx.hosting-w.gsi.gov.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1LgBBs-0000Z8-R3
for [email address]; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 05:04:44 +0000
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: [email address]
X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-89.messagelabs.com!1236488683!41791398!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.0.0; banners=-,-,justice.gsi.gov.uk
X-Originating-IP: [82.111.230.212]
X-SpamReason: No, hits=1.6 required=7.0 tests=DEAR_SOMETHING
Received: (qmail 8698 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2009 05:04:43
-0000
Received: from sandwich.ukcod.org.uk (HELO sandwich.ukcod.org.uk)
(82.111.230.212) by server-6.tower-89.messagelabs.com with
AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 8 Mar 2009 05:04:43 -0000
Received: from foi by sandwich.ukcod.org.uk with local (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <[email address]>) id 1LgBBr-0001hz-MP for [email
address]; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 05:04:43 +0000
From: "fred robinson" <[email address]>
To: "FOI requests at MoJ" <[email address]>
Subject: Freedom of Information request - FUNCTION OF THE TCC COURT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="UTF-8"
Message-ID: <[email address]>
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 05:04:43 +0000
X-Source: Internet
Return-Path: <[email address]>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Mar 2009 05:04:45.0020 (UTC)
FILETIME=[65A361C0:01C99FAB]

Dear Sir or Madam,

I request under the freedom of information act that you confirm or
deny the TCC court is the correct court to deal with a personal
injury claim arising from a broken window.

Yours faithfully,

fred robinson

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be
published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/about...

Is [email address] the wrong address for Freedom
of Information requests to Ministry of Justice? If so please
contact us using this form:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/contact
-------------------------------------------------------------------

This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the
Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your
organisations IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes.

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention
of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention
of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may
be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

DOES NOT ANSWER MY FOI REQUEST WHICH, I CONFIRM, IS A REQUEST FOR
INFORMATION UNDER THE FOIA.

Yours sincerely,

fred robinson

Link to this

Mr fred robinson (Account suspended) left an annotation ( 9 July 2009)

I am the applicant formally known as fred robinson.

With regard to my 19 FOI Requests dated between February 19th and March 13th 2009. I have received the following letter from The Access & Data Compliance Unit at Petty France dated July 7th 2009 regarding a DPA Subject Access Request in a letter received on June 1st 2009.

I have not made such a request as I have never address any written correspondence to the Unit at any time, the Unit states:

“Thank you for your letter of June 1st 2009 in which you made a Subject Access Request (SAR) for information held by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) relating to yourself. Under the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA), the MoJ must comply with the request within 40 days of its receipt, or if later within, within 40 calendar days of receipt of the necessary information such as proof of identity or the prescribed fee. The MoJ charge a fee of £10 for this service in line with the provisions of the DPA. The fee can be paid either by cheque or postal order and should be made payable to Her Majesty’s Paymaster General or HMPG. Proof of identity can be confirmed by providing a copy of a recent utility bill or a copy of the photograph page of your passport or driving licence. Unfortunately, we cannot currently process your request due to the requirements of the outstanding charge. It should also be noted that I can see several specific requests in your letter relating to information held by the Information Commission but have been unable to identify exactly what information you are requesting from the MoJ. Due to the size of the Department, it is not possible to conduct a general search of each MoJ location. I would be grateful if you could let me know which parts of the Department you wish me to conduct the searches, eg such as a specific office of the Tribunal Service or court in Her Majesty’s Court Service. Wherever possible please also supply a timescale over which you believe the information would be held.”

Mr fred robinson