Follow this request
There are 2 people following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
FAIR HEARING
To Office of the Legal Services Ombudsman by Julie Shrive (Account suspended) 9 July 2009
CIVIL LIBERTIES ABUSE ??!!DEMOCRATIC??!!
To Information Commissioner’s Office by Julie Shrive (Account suspended) 6 July 2009
DISCRETION
To Ministry of Justice by Julie Shrive (Account suspended) 15 May 2009
ETHICAL BEHAVIOR from JUDICIARY?
To Office for Judicial Complaints by Julie Shrive (Account suspended) 5 June 2009
URGENT LCO needed for FAIR HEARING due to fraud committed
To Ministry of Justice by Julie Shrive (Account suspended) 4 July 2009
CALL CENTRES & CRIME
To The Association of Chief Police Officers of England, Wales and Northern Ireland by Julie Shrive (Account suspended) 31 May 2009
ROUND IN CIRCLE - FAIR RESOLUTION ?
To Ministry of Justice by Julie Shrive (Account suspended) 16 June 2009
LOSS OF TRADING STANDARDS
To Office of Fair Trading by Julie Shrive (Account suspended) 28 May 2009
In a Democracy?
To Department for Work and Pensions by Julie Shrive (Account suspended) 7 June 2009
FRAUD - DELIBERATE LOSS OF EVIDENCE ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE
Julie Shrive (Account suspended) made this Freedom of Information request to Social Security Advisory Committee
Social Security Advisory Committee did not have the information requested.
From: Julie Shrive (Account suspended)
22 June 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Who checks that an Appeals Tribunals decision has been executed
fairly ?As I and many others ,have been caused injustice. Nobody
appears to be in charge resolving ??!! They use legal and medical
persons names to pretend they are them on a remit . Often documents
are not signed .Surely fraudulent?
Yours faithfully,
Julie Shrive
From: SSAC DWP New Court
Social Security Advisory Committee
22 June 2009
Dear Julie Shrive
The SSAC is an advisory body to government, dealing with social security
policy and law, and your concerns do not fall within our remit. I would
suggest that you direct your enquiry to the Administrative Justice and
Tribunals Council.
Regards
Gill Saunders (Committee Secretary)
show quoted sections
From: Julie Shrive (Account suspended)
23 June 2009
Dear SSAC DWP New Court,
Do you think haven't been ??!!!!! Where is official not on remit or
contract dealing with discretionary and ethical issues or are we
not in a democracy? Need urgent meeting as needs to be oral as I am
dyspraxic and confused with legal expert witness as THE RCJ are
acting illegally . Apparently stats show that . This is second time
since 2001/2 ??!! How many others suffered ?Do you not understand
how serious this is??!!
Julie Shrive
8 June 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Who sees that the administration of Benefits and the Tribunal
Service carries out the decision made as I have spent years trying
to find out . What I have found there is noone legal overseeing
their maladministration to point it is now corrupted . Who is able
to resolve problems and injustice when staff for Government appear
to be on remits not to.This I have just had from Parliamentary
Ombudsman who just reitterate their role and what can't do??Then
blame and so rude put phone down .In a democracy?
Yours faithfully,
Julie Shrive
Link to this | Send follow up
Data Access & Compliance Unit
The Tribunals Service
8 June 2009
This is an Auto Reply from the Data Access & Compliance Unit.
Thank you for your e-mail.
If your message was a request for information please be advised
that
your request is being dealt with and you will receive a written
ackowledgement shortly.
Data Access & Compliance Unit
Information Directorate
Ministry of Justice
6th Floor, Zone B, Postal Point 6.23
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ
Fax: 0203 334 2245
E-mail: [email address]
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention
of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention
of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may
be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
show quoted sections
Link to this | Reply to this message
You left an annotation (10 June 2009)
NB
I am coming to the Home Office to resolve all problems of
organisations everywhere functioning like call centres with no
discretion . In a democratic country is the Home Office trying to
dodge the issue . Typical . Why lack integrity ? How do you intend
resolving as you seem incapable of knowing what is right or
wrong?So will have to go to PM's office as IFO has same
unreasonable structure .
Link to this
Ben Jones left an annotation (10 June 2009)
Why do you think the Home Office has responsibility for this?
Link to this
You left an annotation (11 June 2009)
Perhaps this arrogant person would have the decency to point me in
the right direction or does he know a there is no regulation, and
that monitoring to ascertain there no corruption or bias with
taxpayers money, doesn't exist .
Does he not think it is serious working fo ran organisation that is
set up to resolve , taking a wage for maladministrating as has no
knowledge of named officers.
Link to this
Julie Shrive
22 June 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Why are data , access & compliance dealing with this serious issue
- typical Is it legal to have noone legal overseeing that
judgements are carried out & as for letter just received where
you've deliberately misinterpreted what was said oh dear . As for
Judicial review you've all deliberately destroyed evidence so you
do not have to address your illegal actions which police refuse to
address too . Surely fraud?So request an Internal Review . Will you
be contracting them in?
Yours sincerely,
Julie Shrive
Link to this | Send follow up
Data Access & Compliance Unit
The Tribunals Service
22 June 2009
This is an Auto Reply from the Data Access & Compliance Unit.
Thank you for your e-mail.
If your message was a request for information please be advised
that
your request is being dealt with and you will receive a written
ackowledgement shortly.
Data Access & Compliance Unit
Information Directorate
Ministry of Justice
6th Floor, Zone B, Postal Point 6.23
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ
Fax: 0203 334 2245
E-mail: [email address]
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention
of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention
of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may
be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
show quoted sections
Link to this | Reply to this message
Julie Shrive
23 June 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Is this a democratic society or fascist regime?What date was my
question asked & how has the issue been resolved or are you only
interested in process with no discretion ? Why have you said on
system am Appealing when it is Nottingham defrauding not giving the
backdating and Admin court who sent all documents unsigned by the
legal person maladministrating time -- I have a legal expert
witness German who is horrified who says emigrate. . I am not I
want litigation but without my evidence dating back to 1997 NB
Affadavit that Royal Courts of Justice deliberately destroyed I
don't think going to get a FAIR HEARING ??!! Already ignored
CARDIAC symptons resulting in CARDIAC ARREST !!!This is
professional and medical negligence that the lawyers refuse to help
with. Why ??!!Are they lining their pockets too??!!Who not on remit
or contract is going to sort this out?
Yours sincerely,
Julie Shrive
Link to this | Send follow up
Data Access & Compliance Unit
The Tribunals Service
23 June 2009
This is an Auto Reply from the Data Access & Compliance Unit.
Thank you for your e-mail.
If your message was a request for information please be advised
that
your request is being dealt with and you will receive a written
ackowledgement shortly.
Data Access & Compliance Unit
Information Directorate
Ministry of Justice
6th Floor, Zone B, Postal Point 6.23
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ
Fax: 0203 334 2245
E-mail: [email address]
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention
of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention
of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may
be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
show quoted sections
Link to this | Reply to this message
Data Access & Compliance Unit
The Tribunals Service
23 June 2009
Please can you forward me your FOI reference no so I can check our
system?
Regards
Data Access and Compliance Unit
6TH floor 102 Petty France.
Post point 6.25
London
SW1H 9AJ
show quoted sections
Link to this | Reply to this message
Julie Shrive
23 June 2009
Dear Data Access & Compliance Unit,
Is this how you address serious issues and problems bullying .
Outrageous a torture by negligence unit ! Number ??!!! You are
wasting tax payers money .
Yours sincerely,
Julie Shrive
Link to this | Send follow up
Data Access & Compliance Unit
The Tribunals Service
23 June 2009
This is an Auto Reply from the Data Access & Compliance Unit.
Thank you for your e-mail.
If your message was a request for information please be advised
that
your request is being dealt with and you will receive a written
ackowledgement shortly.
Data Access & Compliance Unit
Information Directorate
Ministry of Justice
6th Floor, Zone B, Postal Point 6.23
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ
Fax: 0203 334 2245
E-mail: [email address]
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention
of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention
of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may
be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
show quoted sections
Link to this | Reply to this message
Data Access & Compliance Unit
The Tribunals Service
23 June 2009
We need the reference number to track progress of the request.
Regards
Data Access and Compliance Unit
6TH floor 102 Petty France.
Post point 6.25
London
SW1H 9AJ
show quoted sections
Link to this | Reply to this message
What best describes the status of this request now?
I'm still waiting for the internal review
They are going to reply by post
The review has finished and overall:
They do not have the information (maybe they say who does)
I've received some of the information
I've received all the information
My request has been rejected
I've received an error message
(and we'll suggest what to do next)
Things to do with this request
Anyone:
The Tribunals Service only:
Respond to request
Contact WhatDoTheyKnow | Built by mySociety ... and you | Dedicated
to Chris Lightfoot
Yours sincerely,
Julie Shrive
From: SSAC DWP New Court
Social Security Advisory Committee
23 June 2009
Dear Ms Shrive
As I explained in my previous email, the SSAC cannot help you with your
enquiry. I can only suggest that you seek assistance from an independent
advice agency, such as your local Citizens Advice Bureau.
Regards
Gill Saunders
show quoted sections
From: Julie Shrive (Account suspended)
24 June 2009
Dear SSAC DWP New Court,
If you don't know how am I supposed to and I am paying your salary
Not good enough.Complying with fraud.
Yours sincerely,
Julie Shrive
Julie Shrive (Account suspended) left an annotation (26 June 2009)
Who are you what is your position or are you poking your nose into another persons business without permission , as your advice I have done & caused the problem you have no idea how to resolve or understand right and wrong ??!!! No wonder going round and round in circles .
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests






Ben Jones left an annotation (24 June 2009)
It would be so much easier for all concerned if you were to clearly state what your problem was without recourse to abbreviations and rather mysterious references to lost paperwork and your MA.
I've said this before in another annotation either contact the CAB for advice, or go to your loacl or even national newspaper they are always looking for an excuse to bash hard working public sector workers. Maybe that will get you the publicity and teh resolution you need.
apologies for the bad spelling as like you I too am dyspraxic and duslexic
Link to this