FRAUD - DELIBERATE LOSS OF EVIDENCE ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE

Dear Sir or Madam,
re:DLA Admin Nottingham supersceding last TRIBUNALS DECISION of
higher rate DLA & backdating 4 yrs by giving award & not backdating
to when first applied 1997 because you changed building and rules
to your advantage. Saying should Appeal when ripped off by a
Solicitor not litigating .
There is
FRAUD - DELIBERATE LOSS OF EVIDENCE as noone legal contactable in
ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE charge x 2 . They appear to be directed
legal persons in your office ignoring the Affadavit & deliberately
witholding/destroying evidence of 12 years.

SENT TO OFFICE FOR JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS

Dear Sir or Madam, Can a Court destroy evidence as the Royal Courts
of Justice have done x2 now [ 12 ye... Awaiting response.
Request sent to Ministry of Justice by Julie Shrive on 28 May 2009.
FRAUD - DELIBERATE LOSS OF EVIDENCE ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE
A Freedom of Information request to Ministry of Justice by Julie
Shrive Currently waiting for a response fr... Awaiting response.
Request sent to Information Commissioner’s Office by Julie Shrive
on 28 May 2009.

RETURN OF EVIDENCE

A Freedom of Information request to Office for Judicial Complaints
by Julie Shrive

Waiting for an internal review by Office for Judicial Complaints of
their handling of this request.

Julie Shrive

15 May 2009

Dear Sir or Madam,

Can a Court destroy evidence as the Royal Courts of Justice have
done x2 now [ 12 years work] which can prove the administration is
making legal decisions illegally ? This was basis of MA in 2003
which had to be extended a year to find noone legal monitoring .

Yours faithfully, Julie Shrive

Link to this | Send follow up

O'Brien, Darren
Office for Judicial Complaints

21 May 2009

Our Ref: 5979/2009

21st May 2009

Dear Julie,
Thank you for your email of 15th May 2009.
I hope you will find it helpful if I explain that the role of the
Office for Judicial Complaints (OJC) is to support the Lord Chief
Justice and the Lord Chancellor in their joint responsibilities for
judicial conduct and discipline. Their responsibilities cover
matters relating to allegations of personal misconduct in the way
that a judicial office holder has behaved, whether inside or
outside of the courtroom.
Issues of personal conduct include, but are not restricted to, use
of profane, sexist, or racist language, behaving aggressively, or
shouting. Where incidents involving the personal conduct of a
judicial office holder occur, the Office for Judicial Complaints
will make further enquiries. If allegations of personal misconduct
are substantiated, The Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice will
jointly decide what disciplinary action, if any, is necessary.
Neither the Lord Chief Justice, the Lord Chancellor nor officials
in this Office, is able to consider or intervene with complaints
about judicial decisions. The only way in which a judicial decision
can be challenged is by appeal to a higher court.
I am afraid that the issue raised in your email falls outside of
the remit of this office so I am unable to assist you.
If you require anything further please do not hesitate to contact
us.
Best regards,

Darran O'Brien
Administrative Support Officer

The Office for Judicial Complaints
4th Floor, Clive House,
Petty France
London
SW1H 9EX

Tel: 020 7189 2932
Fax: 020 7189 2941

www.judicialcomplaints.gov.uk

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

Julie Shrive

22 May 2009

Dear O'Brien, Darren,

Yet again an admin person, probably in a Call centre set up, is
giving irrelevent, completely useless information, wasting time and
tax payers money . The process for raising issues have been
maladministrated by all since 1997 by most anarchaic Governmental
and private authorities, with banks of admin. governed by a sole
accountant misinterpreting dubious research, based on statistics
with discretion biased in their favour . I don't expect those in
charge everywhere, with discretion, to be bought in on contract and
NEVER contactable using admin directed .Have they not taken ethical
codes.

Nor there to be NO TRADING STANDARDS, so the villains running the
country via LAs , PCTs and hospitals . The basis for my MA was a
pilot accessing Judicial Review via Royal Courts of Justice which
never happened due to noone legal monitoring or making decisions
surely illegal? Even though this was under MPs nose???!

! I had to extend MA a year as a result .

This time a Solicitor did not litigate as requested using the
payment for this to pay my legal consultant [ who can't] and had
been paying as worked collaboratively for years - she had given me
to believe she had own company . £2000 was paid to them[ her new
p/t employer to litigate ] They just used it to pay her to sort
this evidence out which asked her never to do . She now no longer
works for them they[ Court admin] have deliberately destroyed paper
after agreeing to return not letting courier pick up as she is no
longer with firm as did not pay her The admin agreed to return but
not to allow Courier to collect then did not send deliberately
destroying . I know that if go to Leamington Spa LEGAL COMPLAINTSo
them sending bills when not signed up or doing as directed as did
at christmas [ oral] will deliberately maladministrate taking side
of Solicitoras set up same way . Probably done so altready .Surely
Law doesn't allow this fraudulent behaviour ? Or does it? I know
medicine & Government and every Charity and Court / Tribunal
does??!! What next? Advice is waste of time I need assistance &
ethical action & request internal review .

Yours sincerely,

Julie Shrive

PS This involves admin maladministrating[ hearings, discussions
without me, times manipulated and no document/letter ever signed .
Appeal Tribunal Decision [ over 8] to backdate 4 years[ contributed
to CARDIAC ARREST] for higher rate DLA which am getting but did not
backdate . The evidence backed up Affadavit & without it will never
get fair hearing, A re the admin in charge because last time MA
said the Court Service does not adress discretion surely HUB OF
MATTER Surely Civil Liberties abuse .

Link to this | Send follow up

O'Brien, Darren
Office for Judicial Complaints

27 May 2009

Our Ref: 5979/2009

27th May 2009

Dear Julie,

Thank you for your email dated 22nd May 2009. I am sorry that you
were not satisfied with my reply.

I am afraid that the Office for Judicial Complaints are only able
to investigate complaints regarding the personal conduct of a
judicial office holder. If you wish to complain about the service
you received from the court then I advise contacting the HMCS
Customer Service Unit at the following address:

1.42, 1st Floor
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ

As you acknowledge in your email, all complaints made against a
solicitor must be lodged with the Legal Complaints Service. They
can be contacted on 0845 608 6565.

I am sorry that I am unable to assist you further.

Best regards,

Darran O'Brien
Administrative Officer

The Office for Judicial Complaints
4th Floor, Clive House,
Petty France
London
SW1H 9EX

Tel: 020 7189 2932
Fax: 020 7189 2941

You left an annotation (28 May 2009)

Should an administrative court be abusing their power operating
without legal people in charge ? How does one address this as an
anarchaic administration has deliberately destroyed documents x 2 -
evidence that a disparate solicitor charged £2000 for litigation
then allowed papers to be filed from 1997 sending it back to those
who caused problem in first place Appeals Tribunals .The admin
Nottingham DLA did put into action a Tribunals decision but not
backdate [ when should a have been in 1997 when another Dept
targeted into early medical retirement because of their antibiotic
policy .Since had a cardiac so how can they not backdate decision
without me there . Have expert witness and Affadavit to prove .

Link to this

Julie Shrive

29 May 2009

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Office for Judicial
Complaints's handling of my FOI request 'RETURN OF EVIDENCE' as
surely illegal and fraudulent and an abuse of power to have an
unqualiufied biased admin maladministrating evidence to the
Government's advantage.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/re...

Yours sincerely,

Julie Shrive

Yours faithfully,

Julie Shrive

Dear Sir or Madam,
As I have not been communicated fairly with by your legal person ,
now x2- recognise voice I will be requesting Internal Review from
Home Office as you have not assisted me for years knowing I am
Dyspraxic needing to communicate orally .

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Department for Work
and Pensions's handling of my FOI request 'FRAUD - DELIBERATE LOSS
OF EVIDENCE ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE'.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/fr...

Yours sincerely,

Julie Shrive

Dear DWP Adelphi Freedom-of-Information-Request,

The evidence at RCJ concerned your appalling maladministration
which was destroyed because of the way your admin refused to carry
out a APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION 'S BACKDATING .
Why are you allowing unfair decisions by your staff on remits?
Surely illegal and abuse of power. Your lack of ethics and decency
is unprofessional & downright criminal. So request internal review
from Home Office .

Yours sincerely,

Julie Shrive

Dear DWP Adelphi Freedom-of-Information-Request,
Dear Ms Shrive,

I don't understand this below ? How does it resolve ? Dyspraxic
need to do orally . More concerned about miscarriage of justice .
Statistics show something severely wrong at Royal Courts of Justice
.acting illegally with noone legal monitoring or making judgements.
PLEASE SORT OUT as have been defrauded by a solicitor taking £2000
to litigate when following process Appeals which has caused
problems since 1997 and a complaints system disregarding neglecting
.So request meeting - oral .

Thank you for your Freedom of Information request dated 30 May 2009
asking:

“I am writing to request an internal review of Department for Work
and Pensions's handling of my FOI request 'FRAUD - DELIBERATE LOSS
OF EVIDENCE ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE'.”

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has only received a
request for internal review from you, regarding your request `Fraud
- Deliberate loss of evidence Royal Courts of Justice', which was
handled by the Office for Judicial Complaints. DWP cannot conduct
an internal review of the Office for Judicial Complaints' handling
of your request. You must ask the Office for Judicial Complaints to
conduct this review.

If the Office for Judicial Complaints' internal review is
unsatisfactory, then you can approach the Information Commissioner,
at the contact details below.

If you are not satisfied with my handling of your request please
tell me why within two calendar months of the date of this letter.
I will then arrange for someone to conduct an internal review of
your request and my handling. The review will be conducted by
another officer, usually of a more senior grade to me. This person
will have taken no part in my original decision. You will be
advised of their decision in writing.

Yours sincerely,

Julie Shrive