FRAUD - DELIBERATE LOSS OF EVIDENCE ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE

Dear Sir or Madam,

FRAUD - DELIBERATE LOSS OF EVIDENCE

A Freedom of Information request to Ministry of Justice by Julie
Shrive

Currently waiting for a response from Ministry of Justice, they
must respond promptly but no later than 25 June 2009.

Julie Shrive

28 May 2009

Dear Sir or Madam,

SENT TO OFFICE FOR JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS Dear Sir or Madam,

Can a Court destroy evidence as the Royal Courts of Justice have
done x2 now [ 12 years work] which can prove the administration is
making legal decisions illegally ? This was basis of MA in 2003
which had to be extended a year to find noone legal monitoring .

Yours faithfully, Julie Shrive

Link to this | Send follow up

O'Brien, Darren Office for Judicial Complaints

21 May 2009

Our Ref: 5979/2009

21st May 2009

Dear Julie, Thank you for your email of 15th May 2009. I hope you
will find it helpful if I explain that the role of the Office for
Judicial Complaints (OJC) is to support the Lord Chief Justice and
the Lord Chancellor in their joint responsibilities for judicial
conduct and discipline. Their responsibilities cover matters
relating to allegations of personal misconduct in the way that a
judicial office holder has behaved, whether inside or outside of
the courtroom. Issues of personal conduct include, but are not
restricted to, use of profane, sexist, or racist language, behaving
aggressively, or shouting. Where incidents involving the personal
conduct of a judicial office holder occur, the Office for Judicial
Complaints will make further enquiries. If allegations of personal
misconduct are substantiated, The Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief
Justice will jointly decide what disciplinary action, if any, is
necessary. Neither the Lord Chief Justice, the Lord Chancellor nor
officials in this Office, is able to consider or intervene with
complaints about judicial decisions. The only way in which a
judicial decision can be challenged is by appeal to a higher court.
I am afraid that the issue raised in your email falls outside of
the remit of this office so I am unable to assist you. If you
require anything further please do not hesitate to contact us. Best
regards,

Darran O'Brien Administrative Support Officer

The Office for Judicial Complaints 4th Floor, Clive House, Petty
France London SW1H 9EX

Tel: 020 7189 2932 Fax: 020 7189 2941

www.judicialcomplaints.gov.uk

RESTRICTED - This information is intended for the recipient only
and should not be copied to a wider audience without the permission
of the author

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention
of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention
of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may
be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

Julie Shrive

22 May 2009

Dear O'Brien, Darren,

Yet again an admin person, probably in a Call centre set up, is
giving irrelevent, completely useless information, wasting time and
tax payers money . The process for raising issues have been
maladministrated by all since 1997 by most anarchaic Governmental
and private authorities, with banks of admin. governed by a sole
accountant misinterpreting dubious research, based on statistics
with discretion biased in their favour . I don't expect those in
charge everywhere, with discretion, to be bought in on contract and
NEVER contactable using admin directed .Have they not taken ethical
codes.

Nor there to be NO TRADING STANDARDS, so the villains running the
country via LAs , PCTs and hospitals . The basis for my MA was a
pilot accessing Judicial Review via Royal Courts of Justice which
never happened due to noone legal monitoring or making decisions
surely illegal? Even though this was under MPs nose???!

! I had to extend MA a year as a result .

This time a Solicitor did not litigate as requested using the
payment for this to pay my legal consultant [ who can't] and had
been paying as worked collaboratively for years - she had given me
to believe she had own company . £2000 was paid to them[ her new
p/t employer to litigate ] They just used it to pay her to sort
this evidence out which asked her never to do . She now no longer
works for them they[ Court admin] have deliberately destroyed paper
after agreeing to return not letting courier pick up as she is no
longer with firm as did not pay her The admin agreed to return but
not to allow Courier to collect then did not send deliberately
destroying . I know that if go to Leamington Spa LEGAL COMPLAINTSo
them sending bills when not signed up or doing as directed as did
at christmas [ oral] will deliberately maladministrate taking side
of Solicitoras set up same way . Probably done so altready .Surely
Law doesn't allow this fraudulent behaviour ? Or does it? I know
medicine & Government and every Charity and Court / Tribunal
does??!! What next? Advice is waste of time I need assistance &
ethical action & request internal review .

Yours sincerely,

Julie Shrive

PS This involves admin maladministrating[ hearings, discussions
without me, times manipulated and no document/letter ever signed .
Appeal Tribunal Decision [ over 8] to backdate 4 years[ contributed
to CARDIAC ARREST] for higher rate DLA which am getting but did not
backdate . The evidence backed up Affadavit & without it will never
get fair hearing, A re the admin in charge because last time MA
said the Court Service does not adress discretion surely HUB OF
MATTER Surely Civil Liberties abuse .

Link to this | Send follow up

O'Brien, Darren Office for Judicial Complaints

27 May 2009

Our Ref: 5979/2009

27th May 2009

Dear Julie,

Thank you for your email dated 22nd May 2009. I am sorry that you
were not satisfied with my reply.

I am afraid that the Office for Judicial Complaints are only able
to investigate complaints regarding the personal conduct of a
judicial office holder. If you wish to complain about the service
you received from the court then I advise contacting the HMCS
Customer Service Unit at the following address:

1.42, 1st Floor 102 Petty France London SW1H 9AJ

As you acknowledge in your email, all complaints made against a
solicitor must be lodged with the Legal Complaints Service. They
can be contacted on 0845 608 6565.

I am sorry that I am unable to assist you further.

Best regards,

Darran O'Brien Administrative Officer

The Office for Judicial Complaints 4th Floor, Clive House, Petty
France London SW1H 9EX

Tel: 020 7189 2932 Fax: 020 7189 2941

www.judicialcomplaints.gov.uk

RESTRICTED - This information is intended for the recipient only
and should not be copied to a wider audience without the permission
of the author

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention
of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention
of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may
be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

You left an annotation (28 May 2009)

Should an administrative court be abusing their power operating
without legal people in charge ? How does one address this as an
anarchaic administration has deliberately destroyed documents x 2 -
evidence that a disparate solicitor charged £2000 for litigation
then allowed papers to be filed from 1997 sending it back to those
who caused problem in first place Appeals Tribunals .The admin
Nottingham DLA did put into action a Tribunals decision but not
backdate [ when should a have been in 1997 when another Dept
targeted into early medical retirement because of their antibiotic
policy .Since had a cardiac so how can they not backdate decision
without me there . Have expert witness and Affadavit to prove .

Yours faithfully,

Julie Shrive

Link to this | Send follow up

ANNOTATION

So nobody can address the civil liberties abuse my LA has
registered me dishonestly as mentally disabled so does not have to
provide assistance this has caused cardiac arrest.All regulatory
and charitable bodies including parliamentary one and leaders
complying because have same set up - Call centre.

Dear Sir or Madam,

Under the Freedom of Information Act you should have replied by
now, and are breaking the law this is not suprising because you are
copying the structure that elsewhere is causing problems ,
maladministrating 2/3 x since 1996. So I need a meeting urgently in
London with someone who can resolve not on a remit or contract.

Yours sincerely,

Julie Shrive

Dear Sir or Madam,

It is a poor show when you are last in the line of redress &
haven't the decency to contact .Surely professional negligence? You
too operating illegally / What is going on? So request oral meeting
with PM as have been alerting him of these problems since Tony
Blair and e petitions and before 1997 via MP & PM

Yours faithfully,

Julie Shrive

Dear Sir or Madam,

Vanita Patel
Department for Communities and Local Government

1 July 2009

Dear Ms Shrive

I refer to your email dated 5 June. I have spoken to FOI colleagues
who have advised that your "FOI request" falls outside of the FOI
regime as it does not appear to be about existing information.

With regards to your query, local authorities act independently of
central government. Ministers have no remit to intervene in their
day to day affairs except where specific provision has been made in
legislation. However all local authorities are accountable to their
electorate, their auditor and to the courts and all have a duty to
comply with legislation, that is, act legally, just as private
citizens do.

The responsibility for advising the local authority on ensuring
that their actions comply with legislation will normally lie with
the local authority Monitoring Officer.

You refer to the Ombudsman call centre. The new LGO advice Team is
a new approach to first contact with complainants and is intended
to help efficiently deal with calls. In most cases, the Council
will be given the opportunity to sort out the complaint before the
LGO will consider it. The Ombudsman provide a free, independent and
impartial service. When they receive a complaint they are niether
on the side of the complainant nor the respondent authority.

Regards

Vanita Patel
Local Governance

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

Julie Shrive

3 July 2009

Dear Vanita Patel,

I don't believe that in your set up you are not regulated or
monitored no wonder my issues are not being addressed fairly and I
am being caused civil liberties abuse . You are more concerned with
process and to that see that citizens who are paying you are
treated honestly and fairly you don't understand??!!What is going
on? So request internal review from someone contactable not on a
remit or contract done orally as dyspraxic.

Yours sincerely,

Julie Shrive

Yours faithfully,

Julie Shrive