Follow this request
There are 3 people following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
FORCED ADPTION
To Home Office by Mr D Ferguson (Account suspended) 20 June 2009
Amanda Barden Guardian - Cafcass Canterbury Kent
To Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service by I Peroll (Account suspended) 17 June 2009
Suicide rates - losing children to ' forced adoption'
To Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service by I Peroll (Account suspended) 17 June 2009
FOI internal reviews
To House of Commons by Ganesh Sittampalam 27 April 2009
Sarah Hollier Cabinet Member - Cost/Support for Pare nts/Relatives vs Costs of fostering/adopting children
To Kent County Council by Susan Web (Account suspended) 1 September 2009
Abuse of Care Proceedings - Torturing parents and Children for profit.
To House of Commons by LS Palmer (Account suspended) 29 January 2011
A serving Borough Councillor who is prepared to raise her own grandchildren, being denied , so the state can generate money from Forced Adoption.
To Kent County Council by ivanataylor 19 September 2009
FORCED ADOPTION COMPLAINTS
To House of Lords by I Peroll (Account suspended) 22 June 2009
FORCED ADOPTION COMPLAINTS
To Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service by I Peroll (Account suspended) 22 June 2009
FORCED ADOPTION COMPLAINTS
I Peroll (Account suspended) made this Freedom of Information request to House of Commons
The request was refused by House of Commons.
From: I Peroll (Account suspended)
22 June 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Please supply the figures that relate to MP's receiving complaints
with regards to concerns relating to 'forced adoptions' i.e.
without parental consent.
In particular to Conservative MP's, David Cameron , Anne Widdecombe
, Hugh Robertson etc but not exclusively to just Conservatives,
please say how many have replied.
Clearly it is the Conservatives who are in control of most of the
authorities who have control in this issue, but all party MP's are
aware, but appear to be turning a blind eye to what is happening to
thousands of families each year.
Yours faithfully,
I Peroll
From: FOICOMMONS
House of Commons
25 June 2009
Dear Mr Peroll
Thank you for your request for information dated 22 June 2009, received
by us the same day, which is copied below.
We will respond promptly to your request within 20 working days, i.e. on
or before 20 July 2009.
Yours sincerely
________________________________________________________________
Brenda Brevitt
Project Officer
FOI, Department of Resources
House of Commons
P Please consider the environment before printing
Dear Sir or Madam,
Please supply the figures that relate to MP's receiving complaints
with regards to concerns relating to 'forced adoptions' i.e.
without parental consent.
In particular to Conservative MP's, David Cameron , Anne Widdecombe
, Hugh Robertson etc but not exclusively to just Conservatives,
please say how many have replied.
Clearly it is the Conservatives who are in control of most of the
authorities who have control in this issue, but all party MP's are
aware, but appear to be turning a blind eye to what is happening to
thousands of families each year.
Yours faithfully,
I Peroll
show quoted sections
From: FOICOMMONS
House of Commons
20 July 2009
Dear I Peroll,
Thank you for your request for information which is copied below. We can
confirm the information you require is not held by the House of Commons.
Please note information held by individual MPs and their offices is not
subject to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the
House does not have access to this information.
You may wish to contact individual Members directly for the information
you require.
You may, if dissatisfied with the treatment of your request, ask the
House of Commons to conduct an internal review of this decision.
Requests for internal review should be addressed to: Freedom of
Information Officer, Department of Resources, House of Commons London
SW1 OAA or [House of Commons request email]. Please ensure that you specify the
nature of your complaint and any arguments or points that you wish to
make.
If you remain dissatisfied, you may appeal to the Information
Commissioner at Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire SK9 5AF.
Bob Castle
Head of Information Rights and Information Security House of Commons
show quoted sections
From: I Peroll (Account suspended)
24 July 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of House of Commons's
handling of my FOI request 'FORCED ADOPTION COMPLAINTS'.
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/fo...
It is appalling that MP,s are exempt from answering to the Public
whom they are supposedly supposed to serve.
It is because of the lack of transparency and hidden agenda,s that
such atrocities are occurring.
Although I have asked for an internal review , I don't expect there
will be any more of a transparent service, as no such thing appears
to exist.
Is this because we have a de facto government encompassed by de
facto parties?
Yours faithfully,
I Peroll
From: FOICOMMONS
House of Commons
24 July 2009
Dear I Peroll,
Internal review request
Thank you for your email dated 24th July 2009 requesting an internal
review of Freedom of Information request ref: F09-380, which was
received on the same date.
Our internal target for dealing with internal reviews is thirty working
days. We will deal with your request promptly and endeavour to provide
a response by 7th September 2009.
If you have any queries about the review, please contact
[House of Commons request email] quoting your request reference.
Yours,
Patrick Dawson
Data Protection and Freedom of Information Manager
Information Rights and Information Security (IRIS) service
Department of Resources
FOI
House of Commons
London
show quoted sections
From: FOICOMMONS
House of Commons
14 August 2009
F09-380
Dear I Peroll,
Please find attached response to your request for an internal review of
your Freedom of Information request FOI-199.
Yours sincerely,
Katy Gray
Freedom of Information and Data Protection Coordinator
Dear Sir or Madam,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of House of Commons's
handling of my FOI request 'FORCED ADOPTION COMPLAINTS'.
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/fo...
It is appalling that MP,s are exempt from answering to the Public
whom they are supposedly supposed to serve.
It is because of the lack of transparency and hidden agenda,s that
such atrocities are occurring.
Although I have asked for an internal review , I don't expect there
will be any more of a transparent service, as no such thing appears
to exist.
Is this because we have a de facto government encompassed by de
facto parties?
Yours faithfully,
I Peroll
show quoted sections
Ms S Foster (Account suspended) left an annotation (25 August 2009)
House of Lords - Down Lisburn Health and Social Services Trust. Baroness Hale of Richmond. Judgement
34. There is, so far as the parties to this case are aware, no European jurisprudence questioning the principle of freeing for adoption, or indeed compulsory adoption generally. The United Kingdom is unusual amongst members of the Council of Europe in permitting the total severance of family ties without parental consent. (Professor Triseliotis thought that only Portugal and perhaps one other European country allowed this.) It is, of course, the most draconian interference with family life possible.
Although kinship placements are supposed to be the preferred option in this country, only 1 per cent. of social worker-instigated placements ended up with kinship carers, compared with 45 per cent. in Denmark, for example(EVIDENCE given in parliament June 16th 2008 by Tim Loughton MP shadow minister for children)
Mr B Gerrish (Account suspended) left an annotation (29 August 2009)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/colum...
Will be interesting to see if Medway Family Court takes any notice of Lord Justice Thorpe and Lord Justice Wall's criticisms, the latter ordered his comments to be circulated to family courts and adoption agencies across the land.
(Could his comments be referring to the Law of the Land)
The Lords appear to recognize that there is a clear difference between the LAW and legal child kidnap; there cannot be Lawful child kidnap.
Mr B Gerrish (Account suspended) left an annotation (29 August 2009)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/colum...
correct link
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests






Wilson, A (Account suspended) left an annotation (17 August 2009)
In 2007,local authorities in England applied for 8,173 care orders. 7,624 orders were made. 336 applications were withdrawn, 290 "no orders" decisions and 21 orders were refused.
In other words, the judgement of the social workers working for the council was so good, they were only refused by the judge 21 times (0.27%)
More importantly 93% of the time the judge merely rubber-stamped the care orders.
Link to this