Follow this request
There is 1 person following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Justification for taking children from their families.
To Lancashire County Council by Sophie Rises (Account suspended) 24 January 2011
Kidnap is a Crime - Innocent parents losing children.
To Criminal Justice Council by LS Palmer (Account suspended) 29 January 2011
Abuse of Care Proceedings - Torturing parents and Children for profit.
To House of Commons Commission by LS Palmer (Account suspended) 29 January 2011
Abuse of Care Proceedings - Torturing parents and Children for profit.
To Family Procedure Rule Committee by LS Palmer (Account suspended) 29 January 2011
The law isn't clear enough - Children are being removed from families for Profit!
To Department for Education by LS Palmer (Account suspended) 29 January 2011
Double Standards - Parents and Professionals who abuse children should be treated the same.
To Family Justice Council by LS Palmer (Account suspended) 28 January 2011
Abuse of Care Proceedings - Torturing parents and Children for profit.
To Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council by LS Palmer (Account suspended) 29 January 2011
Abuse of Care Proceedings - Torturing parents and Children for profit.
To Government Office for the North West by LS Palmer (Account suspended) 29 January 2011
Abuse of Care Proceedings - Torturing parents and Children for profit.
To Government Office for East Midlands by LS Palmer (Account suspended) 29 January 2011
Forced Adoption - complaint
S Davis (Account suspended) made this Freedom of Information request to Kent County Council
Waiting for an internal review by Kent County Council of their handling of this request.
From: S Davis (Account suspended)
4 June 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Please confirm whether or not Conservative Christopher Garland
Leader of Maidstone Borough Council wife has filed a written
complaint (from their family address) with Conservative Paul Carter
Leader of Kent County Council, regarding forced adoption.
Yours faithfully,
S Davis
Kent County Council
24 June 2009
Dear S Davis
Thank you for your email.
The Council is of the opinion that this latest communication, when
considered in conjunction with all the other requests you have
submitted, is a deliberate attempt to disrupt the Council's operations and
is therefore manifestly unreasonable. The Council has no obligation to
respond to requests that are perceived to be either vexatious or repeated
under section 14 (1) & (2) of the Freedom of Information Act
respectively and collectively, your requests fall into this category. The
Council will review this position in three months time but until then, no
further requests from you will be considered. Nevertheless, the Leader's
office can confirm that they have no record of receiving any complaint on
any subject from the person you specify.
If you disagree with this stance, you can appeal direct the Information
Commissioner, who oversees compliance with the Freedom of Information Act
2000. This is because there is no-one sufficiently senior within the
Authority that could conduct an independent internal review of this
decision which was made at the highest level. Details of what you need to
do, should you wish to pursue this course of action, are available from
the Information Commissioner's website .
[1]http://www.ico.gov.uk/complaints/freedom...
Best regards
Caroline Dodge
Corporate Access to Information Coordinator, Chief Executive's Department
Kent County Council, Legal & Democratic Services, Room 1.94, Sessions
House, County Hall, Maidstone. ME14 1XQ.
Tel: 01622 221652 - Fax: 01622 694383
[2]http://www.kent.gov.uk/council-and-democ...
show quoted sections
From: S Davis (Account suspended)
28 June 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
With such a blatant rejection, it can only be presumed that the
answer is YES.
Please feel free to correct the record is this is NOT the case.
Yours sincerely,
S Davis
From: S Davis (Account suspended)
21 August 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of Kent County Council's
handling of my FOI request 'Forced Adoption - complaint'.
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/fo...
Yours faithfully,
S Davis
Mr B Gerrish (Account suspended) left an annotation (29 August 2009)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/colum...
correct link
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests






Mr B Gerrish (Account suspended) left an annotation (29 August 2009)
Will be interesting to see if Medway Family Court takes any notice of Lord Justice Thorpe and Lord Justice Wall's criticisms, the latter ordered his comments to be circulated to family courts and adoption agencies across the land.
(Could his comments be referring to the Law of the Land)
The Lords appear to recognize that there is a clear difference between the LAW and legal child kidnap; there cannot be Lawful child kidnap.
Link to this