FOI Royals Exemption

Franc McLaughlin made this Freedom of Information request to Cabinet Office

The request was refused by Cabinet Office.

From: Franc McLaughlin

15 June 2009

Dear Sir or Madam,

The following proposal appeared in the PMs statement last week on
rebuilding the constitution -

'As the [Dacre] report recommended, we have considered the need to
strengthen protection for particularly sensitive material and there
will be protection of Royal Family ..papers.'

This was in response to the recommendatin in the Dacre Review which
read -

'We therefore recommend that, in parallel with the adoption of a 15
year rule, the government, in consultation with interested parties,
may wish to consider whether there is a case for enhanced
protection of such categories of information.'

Please disclose the relevant consultations.

Yours faithfully,

Franc McLaughlin

Link to this

Cabinet Office

16 June 2009

CABINET OFFICE REFERENCE: FOI266153

Dear Mr McLaughlin,

Thank you for your request for information. Your request was received on
16/06/2009 and is being dealt with under the terms of the Freedom of
Information Act 2000.

In some circumstances a fee may be payable and if that is the case, I will
let you know the likely charges before proceeding.

If you have any queries about this letter, please contact me. Please
remember to quote the reference number above in any future communications.

Yours sincerely,

FOI Team
Cabinet Office
E: [1][Cabinet Office request email]

The Cabinet Office computer systems may be monitored and communications
carried on them recorded, to secure the effective operation of the system
and for other lawful purposes.

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[Cabinet Office request email]

Link to this

Cabinet Office

14 July 2009


Attachment FOI266153.pdf
1.2M Download View as HTML


Please see the attached letter.

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: Franc McLaughlin

14 July 2009

Dear Sir or Madam,

Thank you for your reply. I wish to you to carry out an internal
review of the case, having regard to the following points.

If you have to weigh the public interest in relation to the section
35 exemption, that must mean there could be cases where the public
interest would be in disclosure, despite the exemption being
engaged. Your argumentation does not seem to demonstrate why this
is not one of those cases. You don't seem to have demonstrated how
the public interest in protecting the information outweighs the
public interest in disclosure.

Similarly in relation to the section 37 exemption, it is not
apparent that your arguments would ever allow for disclosure. There
are special considerations here in that the subject of the
exchanges was about the convention itself. On the one hand,
therefore, it was a step removed from the generality of exchanges
that the convention is presumably intended to protect; and on the
other hand, since it was a strategic issue about the convention
itself, then there is surely a particularly strong interest in
transparency, to demonstrate that the convention and the exemption
are being sensibly applied and protected.

In regard to the section 41 exemption, I am puzzled as to who you
allege might take legal action.

I trust your review will consider impartially consider all aspects
of the case in addition to the arguments that occur to me.

Yours faithfully,

Franc McLaughlin

Link to this

Cabinet Office

15 July 2009

Dear Mr McLaughlin,

Thank you for Internal Review request dated 14/07/2009. This is receiving
attention.

Kind Regards,

FOI Team
Cabinet Office
E: [1][Cabinet Office request email]

The Cabinet Office computer systems may be monitored and communications
carried on them recorded, to secure the effective operation of the system
and for other lawful purposes.

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[Cabinet Office request email]

Link to this

Cabinet Office

13 August 2009


Attachment 267245.pdf
498K Download View as HTML


Dear Mr McLaughlin,

Please see the attached letter regarding your request for an internal
review.

Kind regards,

Zara Smart

show quoted sections

Link to this

Franc McLaughlin left an annotation (12 October 2009)

Complaint accepted for action by Information Commissioner's Office

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Cabinet Office only: