Make and explore Freedom of Information requestsFollow this request
There are 2 people following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Disabled Children Removed From Parents
To Ministry of Justice by Liz R (Account suspended) 23 December 2009
The number of court fee exemption/remission applications made for form D8
To Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service by M Keenan 24 November 2011
Litigants in Person in Family Courts
To Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service by Lucy Reed 1 October 2011
Abuse of Care Proceedings - Torturing parents and Children for profit.
To Office for Judicial Complaints by LS Palmer (Account suspended) 29 January 2011
Statistics- successful Pt55 claims by local authorities
To Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service by Brian Tanning 13 July 2011
Convicted Rapists Given Custody of Disabled Children?
To Ministry of Justice by Liz R (Account suspended) 3 January 2010
Court Seal Verification
To Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service by James Moore 17 May 2010
Complaints about court experts.
To Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service by A Williamson 9 December 2010
Issue of Summons by a Local Authority
To Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service by Bret Tom O'Hawks 9 September 2011
Family Justice System Review
To Ministry of Justice by Avril Williams 13 May 2011
Family Courts(Service) Complaints
Susan Web (Account suspended) made this Freedom of Information request to Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service
Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service did not have the information requested.
From: Susan Web (Account suspended)
7 September 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Can you please provide details of how many complaints received
about unlawful practices of Judges and Council SS Legal Team
(children social services) , barrister's etc Cafcass Legal teams
etc , regarding Children taken into ‘care’ by Kent County Council.
Relatives who put themselves forward are considered guilty until
proven innocent, and demands are made that they jump through
assessment hoops, when the House of Lords made it quite clear that
grandparents only have to be good enough parents. The system as it
stands is no better than a 'child trafficking ring.'
It is appalling that in Family Court’s so many children are being
taken into care based on mere opinion of – so-called professionals
and placed for adoption with strangers rather than relatives.
In 2007,local authorities in England applied for 8,173 care orders.
7,624 orders were made. 336 applications were withdrawn, 290 "no
orders" decisions and 21 orders were refused.
In other words, the judgement of the social workers working for the
council was so good, they were only refused by the judge 21 times
(0.27%)
More importantly 93% of the time the judge merely rubber-stamped
the care orders.
House of Lords - Down Lisburn Health and Social Services Trust.
Baroness Hale of Richmond. Judgement
34. There is, so far as the parties to this case are aware, no
European jurisprudence questioning the principle of freeing for
adoption, or indeed compulsory adoption generally. The United
Kingdom is unusual amongst members of the Council of Europe in
permitting the total severance of family ties without parental
consent. (Professor Triseliotis thought that only Portugal and
perhaps one other European country allowed this.) It is, of course,
the most draconian interference with family life possible.
Although kinship placements are supposed to be the preferred option
in this country, only 1 per cent. of social worker-instigated
placements ended up with kinship carers, compared with 45 per cent.
in Denmark, for example(EVIDENCE given in parliament 16th June 2008
by Tim Loughton MP shadow minister for children)
Yours faithfully,
Susan Web
From: Customer Services (CSHQ)
10 September 2009
Dear Ms Web
Thank you for your e-mail. I have forwarded it to the Departmental Data
Access and Compliance Unit for them to reply direct.
Russell Meek
Customer Service Unit
H M Courts Service
0845 4568770
show quoted sections
From: Data Access & Compliance Unit
Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service
11 September 2009
Dear Ms Web,
Please find attached your acknowledgement to your Freedom of Information
request.
Yours sincerely
Hannah Law
(Sent on behalf of Ngozi Amadi)
Data Access & Compliance Unit
Postal Point 6.25, Zone B
102 Petty France
London SW1H 9AJ
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
show quoted sections
From: Susan Web (Account suspended)
11 October 2009
Dear Hannah Law,
Please note a reply to this request should have been supplied by
the 5th October 2009. Please say why this is over due and when a
reply can be expected.
Many thanks.
Yours faithfully,
Susan Web
From: Data Access & Compliance Unit
Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service
11 October 2009
This is an Auto Reply from the Data Access & Compliance Unit.
Thank you for your e-mail.
If your message was a request for information please be advised that your
request is being dealt with and you will receive a written acknowledgement
shortly.
Data Access & Compliance Unit
Information Directorate
Ministry of Justice
6th Floor, Zone B, Postal Point 6.23
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ
Fax: 0203 334 2245
E-mail: [HMCS request email]
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the
addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not
permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be
intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when
deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read
at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
From: Turrell, Pennie
30 November 2009
<<WEB 61199 RESPONSE2 30 11 09.doc>> Dear Ms Web
Please find attached to this e-mail a response to your Freedom Of
Information Act request.
Pennie Turrell
Deputy Head of the Office for Judicial Complaints
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
show quoted sections
LS Palmer (Account suspended) left an annotation (29 November 2010)
http://www.mediafire.com/?igb0f758y7ed677
Download a real life case study on how children are kinapped by CAFCASS through the secret family courts.
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
T Quinn (Account suspended) left an annotation ( 3 October 2009)
this is so sad another nanna saying goodbye to her stolen grandchild
Link to this