Make and explore Freedom of Information requestsFollow this request
There is 1 person following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
MOJ Judges and Staff Expenses
To Ministry of Justice by Liz R (Account suspended) 16 October 2009
Magistrates' Courts cases sat by justices of the peace and District Judges
To Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service by Pete Speller 19 December 2011
Declaration of interest policy
To Judicial Office for England and Wales by Mr S Rai 5 September 2011
Article - Family Courts 'jolly good fun' ? invite to Lord Justice Wall
To Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service by Sheena Williams (Account suspended) 2 May 2010
Due to Ministry of Justice failure to answer - Are Judges required to give their name
To Ministry of Justice by J Walker (Account suspended) 15 October 2009
Family Division Judiciary - Specialists in Family Law
To Ministry of Justice by Stuart Graham 15 March 2011
Family Courts(Service) Complaints
To Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service by Susan Web (Account suspended) 7 September 2009
Training of Judges
To Judicial Studies Board by J Wilson 22 February 2010
C.V of judges pre appointment
To Ministry of Justice by dennis fallon 5 November 2011
Equality Act Judicial Training
To Judicial Studies Board by David Johnson 30 June 2011
Evidence via Telephone in UK
Liz R (Account suspended) made this Freedom of Information request to Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service
Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service did not have the information requested.
From: Liz R (Account suspended)
5 February 2010
Dear Her Majesty's Courts Service,
I gave evidence only by telephone lonk, minus access to legal help,
and due to disability, from my home on many occasions from 2001 to
2007 and sometimes had no telephone link at all only email
confirmation that files had been received = is that complaint with
the Human Rights Act Article 6 or is that left to a particular
judges discretion only? Are judges allowed to ignore Article 6? Do
you have any information regarding the legalities of telephone
evidence at all and especially from June 10th 2001 onwards please
(I had a case where the video link broke down on the second day in
my home, but nobody was sent to fix it, so I could only receive
detail of what had happened from counsel - Mr. Malcolm Chisholm, at
the end of each day at about 6PM when he would call me from his
chambers, I did not have access to the rest of the hearing and
regard it as potentially flawed that I didn't have access as it
involved child custody and the judge (Moorhouse) invited me to have
overnight contact every weekend, only the LA didn't agree and I
didn't get the liberty to have that contact, rather it was left to
discretion of the LA, who have been malicious, in my view, despite
my having done nothing wrong other than be disabled and without a
care plan for me or my disabled son whom was then placed in care
for a year by RBKC (Kensington and Chelsea council)
Yours faithfully,
Liz R
From: Data Access & Compliance Unit
Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service
5 February 2010
This is an Auto Reply from the Data Access & Compliance Unit.
Thank you for your e-mail.
If your message was a request for information please be advised that your
request is being dealt with and you will receive a written acknowledgement
shortly.
Data Access & Compliance Unit
Information Directorate
Ministry of Justice
6th Floor, Zone B, Postal Point 6.23
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ
Fax: 0203 334 2245
E-mail: [HMCS request email]
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
From: Liz R (Account suspended)
6 March 2010
Dear Data Access & Compliance Unit,
by law, the authority should normally have responded promptly and
by 5 March 2010
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ev...
Yours sincerely,
Liz R
From: Data Access & Compliance Unit
Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service
6 March 2010
This is an Auto Reply from the Data Access & Compliance Unit.
Thank you for your e-mail.
If your message was a request for information please be advised that your
request is being dealt with and you will receive a written acknowledgement
shortly.
Data Access & Compliance Unit
Information Directorate
Ministry of Justice
6th Floor, Zone B, Postal Point 6.23
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ
Fax: 0203 334 2245
E-mail: [HMCS request email]
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
From: Customer Services (CSHQ)
10 March 2010
Dear Ms R
Thank you for your e-mail. It may be helpful if I explain that neither the Minister nor administrators can comment on judicial decisions. This is not out of lack of concern but because for them to do so would breach the principle that the judiciary are independent. Judges must be free to make their decisions based on the evidence before them and the current law and free from external influences. Where a person is dissatisfied with a decision, the test of its integrity lies in an appeal to a higher level of judge, subject to prior permission to it being given. I suggest that you seek independent legal advice as to the options still open to you.
Customer Service Unit
Customer Services Division Her Majesty's Courts Service Operations and Performance Directorate - Supporting our people, courts & processes
Customer Services Division
1st Floor - 1.42
102 Petty France
London SW1H 9AJ
': 0845 4568770 : http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/
show quoted sections
From: Liz R (Account suspended)
10 March 2010
Dear Customer Services (CSHQ),
I'm sure the judiciary are concerned, so they should be, it's due
to injustices like this that people are speaking of protests and
even civil war- the fact is I asked a question - do you have any
written data as to whether or not judges are allowed to ignore the
Human Rights Act- AS HAS BEEN DONE IN THIS CASE? are THEY ALLOWED
TO OVERUSE THEIR DISCRETION TO THE POINT OF DISMISSING 56 POINTS OF
LAW AS MUNBY J DID- WITH EVIDENCE?
Why has a private firm- Michcon De Reya - confirmed in 2004 that I
would no longer ever be able to secure the services of a solicitor
EVER AGAIN THUS FORCED AS a DISABLED PERSON TO REPRESENT MYSELF-
IMMEDIATELY DISPENSING WITH MY RIGHT TO A FAIR HEARING? due to
having exposed some of this ROT in out family courts? I cannot get
any legal advice in the UK - you have ensured this- you have me
TOTALLY stonewalled and you know it and the judges know it- this is
MASSIVE INJUSTICE and grave shame on the lot of you, you are a
disgrace and THERE IS no justice
Yours sincerely,
Liz R
From: Liz R (Account suspended)
12 July 2010
Dear Customer Services (CSHQ),
As a member of the public I request Munby J be dismissed as a judge
without further notice, common law applies
Yours sincerely,
Liz R
From: Customer Services (CSHQ)
13 July 2010
Dear Madam,
Thank you for your email. This does not come under the remit of the
Complaint Handling & Enquiries Team. I suggest you seek legal advice.
Regards
Complaint Handling & Enquiries Team
show quoted sections
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Liz R (Account suspended) left an annotation ( 6 March 2010)
Link to this