Follow this request
There are 2 people following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Eligibility of Irish and Commonwealth citizens to sit in the House of Lords
To Ministry of Justice by M Bimmler 11 December 2009
Eligibility of Irish and Commonwealth citizens to sit in the House of Lords
To Foreign and Commonwealth Office by M Bimmler 11 December 2009
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council: contribution to administrative costs
To Ministry of Justice by Kaihsu Tai 1 June 2010
Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 (public access to documents)
To Ministry of Justice by Kaihsu Tai 10 August 2011
House of Lords reform debate
To Ministry of Justice by Mr Wyllie 30 June 2011
Lord Lieutenants in England and Wales
To Ministry of Justice by Kaihsu Tai 1 May 2009
Lords; Personal data: impact on privacy and freedom
To Ministry of Justice by P. John 16 April 2009
New criminal offences under the Labour Government
To Ministry of Justice by John Anderson 20 November 2009
United Reformed Church, Lion Walk, Colchester Act 1980 (c. xlii)
To Ministry of Justice by Kaihsu Tai 17 July 2008
UK government intervention in the Feryn case
To Ministry of Justice by Kaihsu Tai 17 July 2008
Electoral Administration Act 2006: Irish and Commonwealth peers
Kaihsu Tai made this Freedom of Information request to Ministry of Justice
The request was successful.
From: Kaihsu Tai
15 December 2009
Dear Madam or Sir,
Lady Kinnock said in the House of Lords on 10 December, in response
to Lady Gardner of Parkes: ‘It appears that the Electoral
Administration Act 2006 may have inadvertently cast doubts on
whether Commonwealth and Republic of Ireland citizens were eligible
for membership of the House. That was clearly not Parliament’s
intention when passing the Act. Some months ago, the Government
were alerted to the matter.’ (House of Lords Debates, 10 December
2009, column 1190).
Could you please explain what the problem in the drafting of the
said Act is? In particular, please point out the relevant
section(s) in question.
Thank you very much for your attention.
Sincerely,
Dr Kaihsu Tai
From: Data Access & Compliance Unit
Ministry of Justice
15 December 2009
This is an Auto Reply from the Data Access & Compliance Unit.
Thank you for your e-mail.
If your message was a request for information please be advised that your
request is being dealt with and you will receive a written acknowledgement
shortly.
Data Access & Compliance Unit
Information Directorate
Ministry of Justice
6th Floor, Zone B, Postal Point 6.23
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ
Fax: 0203 334 2245
E-mail: [email address]
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the
addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not
permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be
intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when
deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read
at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
From: Over, Darren (ARU)
Ministry of Justice
16 December 2009
Freedom of Information Request FOI/62664/09
Data Access & Compliance Unit
Information Directorate
Zone 6 B
Post point 6.25
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ
T 020 3334 5336
F 020 3334 2245
E [email address]
www.justice.gov.uk
16-DEC-09 Our Ref:FOI/62664/09
Dear Dr Kaihsu Tai,
SUBJECT: Freedom of Information Request
Thank you for your correspondence of December 15, 2009, in which you
asked for information about the Electoral Administration Act 2006
under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) from the Ministry of
Justice (MoJ).
You will receive a response from us by January 15, 2010. Your request
has been passed to the appropriate business unit within the MoJ, and
they will write to you with their decision by this date.
The FOIA does provide a number of exemptions. A qualified exemption
requires that before relying on it we must consider the public interest
test. If the information you have requested is covered by a qualified
exemption(s) under FOIA, the Department is allowed to take longer than
20 working days to respond. This is because in such circumstances we are
required to consider the public interest issues when deciding whether or
not to disclose the information requested.
If more time is needed to consider the public interest issues under a
qualified exemption(s), we will write to you and inform you of the
revised date you can expect to receive a response to your request.
If you have any queries regarding this request please do not hesitate to
contact us. Please quote ref: FOI/62664/09 in all future correspondence.
Yours sincerely,
Darren Over
(Sent on behalf of Rhian Williams)
Data Access and Compliance Unit
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the
addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not
permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be
intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when
deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read
at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
From: Kaihsu Tai
18 December 2009
Dear Mr Over,
Since my last message of 15th instant, a colleague alerted me to a
written statement made by Lord Bach on the same day: House of Lords
Debates, 15 December 2009, column 241WS).
http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wms/?id=20... This
satisfactorily answers my query. Therefore, may I please inform you
that I hereby retract my request. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Kaihsu Tai
From: Over, Darren (ARU)
Ministry of Justice
21 December 2009
Kaihsu Tai,
I will notify the relevant caseworker.
show quoted sections
From: Howarth, David
Ministry of Justice
27 January 2010
Dear Dr Tai,
Please find attached a response to your request for information relating
to comments made by Baroness Kinnock on the effect of the Electoral
Administration Act 2006.
I'm sorry it has taken a little while for you to receive a reply. As you
will see from the attached letter, the Government has now made amendments
to the Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill which should clarify the
position of Irish and Commonwealth peers. Attached to the letter is a
statement which explains the issues in more detail.
Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
David Howarth
020 3334 3822
Deputy Bill Manager
Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill
Ministry of Justice
5.25
102 Petty France
London, SW1H 9AJ
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
From: Kaihsu Tai
27 January 2010
Dear Mr Howarth,
Thank you for the further clarification. It was helpful and I
appreciate it.
Sincerely,
Kaihsu Tai
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests





