Follow this request
There is 1 person following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Power Management
To Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh by Martin McKenna 15 February 2011
GREEN IT
To Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh by David Blades 6 June 2011
Student Suicide
To Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh by Ben Archibald 18 April 2010
Student development fund and allocation
To University of Glasgow by Kirsteen M Fraser 31 May 2011
Development fund and various other student funding
To University of Glasgow by Kirsteen M Fraser 31 May 2011
Gateway theatre and planning for Elm Row residential scheme
To City of Edinburgh Council by Alex Smith 2 December 2008
Application Statistics
To Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh by James Carter 31 December 2011
Overdue requests
To Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh by B. Marks 4 October 2011
IT Patch Management Strategy
To Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh by David Blades 28 March 2011
Student Nursing Figures
To Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh by Sophie Jagger 7 March 2011
Deeside Water and its relationship with QMU
Andy Lewis made this Freedom of Information request to Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh
The request was partially successful.
From: Andy Lewis
18 January 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Re: Freedom of Information Request
I am writing regarding the recent publicity generated by a press
release from you that "Deeside Mineral Water actually slows the
signs of ageing and does so 50% more effectively than other tested
waters on the market."
http://www.qmu.ac.uk/research_knowledge/...
I would like to understand the relationship between Deeside water
and the University or any employee of QMU.
Please could you tell me the nature of any relationship between any
member of staff at QMU involved in this research and the company
Deeside Water or their staff? In particular, I would like copies of
emails or documents pertaining to this research exchanged between
QMU and Deeside Water.
Yours faithfully,
Andy Lewis
From: Freedom of Information Act
5 February 2009
Dear Mr Lewis,
Many thanks for your email that we received on Sunday 18th January.
In response to your request we are able to provide you with the
following information.
Deeside Mineral Water commissioned scientists at Queen Margaret
University, Edinburgh (QMU) to investigate if there was any scientific
basis for anecdotal claims of the water's historical curative
properties. The initial contact between Deeside Mineral Water and QMU
was made through Interface (http://www.interface-online.org.uk/), an
organisation funded by the Scottish Funding Council, the Innovative
Actions Programme and the Scottish Government's SEEKIT programme.
Interface offer a central point of access for industry to Scotland's
research base and regularly send out details of potential research
activity to Scottish universities. The initial email QMU received from
Interface is attached to this email for your information.
Dr Mary Warnock, lecturer in the subject area of Dietetics, Nutrition
and Biological Sciences at Queen Margaret University, led the study
which looked at antioxidant and free radical scavenging properties of
some of the leading commercially available mineral waters.
During the course of this research Dr Warnock and her team found that
Deeside Mineral Water was 50% more effective in scavenging free radicals
than the other waters tested. The results were a surprise to both the
University research team and Deeside Mineral Water.
You requested emails pertaining to this research to be released, however
this would constitute release of commercially sensitive information that
would prejudice substantially the commercial interests of Deeside
Mineral Water, any future work carried out between Deeside Mineral Water
and QMU, and other companies that were used in the testing. This
information therefore falls within section 33(1)(b) of the Freedom of
Information (Scotland) Act (Commercial interests and the economy). Here
it reads:
"Information is exempt information if its disclosure under this Act
would, or would be likely to, prejudice substantially the commercial
interests of any person (including, without prejudice to that
generality, a Scottish public authority)".
Section 2 of the Act requires us to apply the public interest test when
considering section 33(1)(b). We believe that the public interest in
releasing commercially sensitive information contained in these emails
would be outweighed by the public interest in avoiding the substantial
prejudice which would result from disclosure. The information is
therefore exempt.
It is common practice for commercial organisations like Deeside Mineral
Water to commission universities to undertake scientific testing of
their products, particularly through such routes as Interface. Often
this occurs because the commercial organisation does not have its own
scientific facilities or appropriate experts. It is important to note
that all scientific testing conducted by Queen Margaret University for
commercial organisations is rigorous and impartial, and results are not
skewed to order to meet the expectations of the commissioning body. The
research was undertaken to normal clinical standards and was undertaken
completely independently from Deeside in order for them to get
impartial, independent results.
Dr Warnock is an academic employee of Queen Margaret University,
Edinburgh and has no prior professional or personal relationship with
Deeside Mineral Water outside this independent research. Deeside
Mineral Water has no links with QMU or any staff, other than this
research study. It is also worth noting that Deeside Mineral Water has
commissioned a number of independent studies at several universities,
laboratories and hospitals and has been through a similar research
process before several times.
I hope this helps, but should you have any questions on the above then
please let me know.
Best wishes
Jamie
Jamie Tait
Business and Research Support Adviser
Strategic Planning and Research Support Unit
Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh
Queen Margaret University Drive
Musselburgh
East Lothian
EH21 6UU
Tel: 0131 474 0000
Fax: 0131 474 0001
Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh is a registered charity: Scottish
Charity Number SC002750.
Your right to review our decision
If you are not satisfied with our response or our reasoning set-out
above, you have forty working days in which to request a review of our
decision. Any request should be put in writing and should be sent to
Ilona Mair, Head of the Strategic Planning and Research Support Unit, at
the address below. The request should:
(a) detail your request for a review of our decision to be undertaken;
(b) describe the nature of your original request; and
(c) explain the reasons why you are dissatisfied with our response.
Mrs Ilona Mair
Head
Strategic Planning and Research Support Unit
Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh
Queen Margaret University Drive
Musselburgh
EH21 6UU
Email: [email address]
If you remain dissatisfied with how your request for information has
been dealt with, you also have the right to apply to the Scottish
Information Commissioner for a decision as to whether we have handled
your request properly. Information relating to your right to seek
review is available from the Scottish Information Commissioner's web
page at:
http://www.itspublicknowledge.info/YourR...
ro.asp or by contacting the Scottish Information Commissioner's Office
at the following address:
Scottish Information Commissioner
Kinburn Castle
Doubledykes Road
St Andrews
Fife
KY16 9DS
Telephone: 01334 464610
Email: [email address]
Website: www.itspublicknowledge.info
show quoted sections
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests






Francis Irving left an annotation ( 6 March 2009)
http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2009/02/...
Link to this