Follow this request
There is 1 person following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Disposal of Royal Navy Ships
To Ministry of Defence by Barnacle Bill 19 January 2009
Defence Nuclear programme Human Resources Study
To Ministry of Defence by Fred WP Dawson 16 November 2010
NGOs and MOD Nuclear Liabilities Management Strategy
To Ministry of Defence by Fred WP Dawson 16 September 2011
Fire at AWE in 2010
To Ministry of Defence by Edwin Morris 16 June 2011
Fire at AWE in 2010
To Ministry of Defence by Edwin Morris 16 June 2011
MOD response to ONR iterim report
To Ministry of Defence by Fred WP Dawson 18 May 2011
Stress-test nuclear facilities
To Ministry of Defence by Fred WP Dawson 16 March 2011
Safety of defence nuclear activities re Japan
To Ministry of Defence by Fred WP Dawson 25 March 2011
Radiation levels.
To Ministry of Defence by Dave Whyte 17 February 2011
Safety concessions Clyde Submarine Base
To Ministry of Defence by Fred WP Dawson 8 November 2010
Decommisioned Nuclear Submarines
Barnacle Bill made this Freedom of Information request to Ministry of Defence
The request was refused by Ministry of Defence.
From: Barnacle Bill
19 January 2009
Dear Sirs,
Under the Freedom of Information Laws could you please provide the
following information:-
Please indicate what plans the MOD has to dispose of decommissioned
nuclear submarines.
Please indicate if any of these have been sold to any other
countries or transferred to another countries Navy.
Many Thanks
Barnacle Bill
From: DES SEC-PolSecSubs2 (Ingram, Kate Miss)
Ministry of Defence
17 February 2009
Dear Sir,
Please see the attached responses to two of your Freedom of Information
requests.
Regards,
DE&S PolSec-AD3
DE&S PolSec-AD3
DE&S Policy Secretariat
Birch 1C #3135
Abbey Wood
Bristol
BS34 8JH
P Save a tree...please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests






VC206 left an annotation ( 1 July 2009)
Even if this is not your identity a ruling that they should have done so would prove useful as it is believed the MoD use pseudonyms too. Such a ruling would then allow a reciprocal challenge to their identities!
Link to this