Dangerous Dogs Act

Amanda Dunckley made this Freedom of Information request to West Midlands Police

The request was successful.

From: Amanda Dunckley

1 March 2010

West Midlands Police,

Dear Sir or Madam,

I am contacting you concerning the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, as
amended, legislation.

1) How many dogs have been seized under Section One of the
Dangerous Dogs Act in 2009?

2) How many prosecutions under Section One and Section Three of the
Dangerous Dogs Act did the west Midlands police proceed with in
2009?

3)How many dogs have been seized under Section One of the Dangerous
Dogs Act (prohibited dogs) so far this year (2010)? Of those
seized, how many have been signed over for destruction by their
owners?

4) How many applications have been made to the magistrates court
under section 4b of the Dangerous Dogs Act in 2008 and 2009?
Of those 4b applications, how many resulted in destruction orders
and how many resulted in registration onto the Index of Exempted
Dogs?

5) How many dogs are currently held under Section One and how may
dogs are held under Section Three of the Dangerous Dogs Act?

6) What number of dogs seized under Section One of the Dangerous
Dogs Act during 2009, have been destroyed or have
died whilst in police custody, due to illness, injury or disease?

7)What number of dogs seized under Section Three of the Dangerous
Dogs Act during 2009, have been destroyed or have
died whilst in police custody, due to illness, injury or disease?

8) What is the cost to the police for the seizure, kennelling,
veterinary treatemnt and legal costs for dogs seized under section
one of the Dangerous Dogs Act in 2007, 2008 and 2009?

Thank you.

Yours faithfully,

Amanda Dunckley

Link to this

From: foi
West Midlands Police

1 March 2010


Attachment attachment.txt
0K Download View as HTML


Dear Ms Dunckley

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000

Thank you for your request for information, received 01 March
2010 concerning dangerous dogs.

Your request is being considered and you will receive a response within
the statutory timescale of 20 working days, as defined by the Act, subject
to the application of any statutory exemptions. Where consideration is
being given to the application of any exemptions the 20 working day
timescale may be extended under the terms of the Act to a period
considered reasonable depending on the nature and circumstances of your
request. In such cases you will be notified and, where possible, a revised
time-scale will be indicated. In all cases we shall attempt to deal with
your request at the earliest opportunity.

There may be a fee payable for the retrieval, collation and provision of
the information requested, where the request exceeds the statutory limit.
In such cases you will be informed in writing and the 20 working day
timescale will be suspended until we receive payment from you or your
request is modified and /or reduced. If you chose not to make full payment
or modify your request then the request will remain unanswered.

Your request may require either full or partial transfer to another public
authority. You will be informed if your request is transferred.

Yours sincerely,

Freedom of Information Unit

Link to this

From: foi
West Midlands Police

16 March 2010


Attachment 3329 ans 01.pdf
13K Download View as HTML

Attachment appeals procedure.pdf
11K Download View as HTML


Dear Ms Dunckley

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000

Further to your email, received 01 March 2010 concerning Dangerous Dogs
Act I am pleased to enclose the following information. Please note that
these data are the closest we hold to your request. They should not be
interpreted as representing anything other than as described in this
response.

The attached document (3329_ans_01.pdf) provides our response.

Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and
complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been
extracted from large disparate administrative data systems used by forces
for police purposes. The detail collected to respond specifically to your
request is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale
recording system. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data
collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into
account when interpreting those data.

The figures provided therefore are our best interpretation of relevance of
data to your request but you should be aware that the collation of figures
for ad hoc requests may have limitations and this should be taken into
account when those data are used.

If you decide to write an article / use the enclosed data we would ask you
to take into consideration the factors highlighted in this document so as
to not mislead members of the public or official bodies or misrepresent
the relevance of the whole or any part of this disclosed material.

Your attention is drawn to your right to request a re-examination of your
case under West Midlands Police review procedure (attached). Please note
that such an appeal must be received within six months of the date of this
correspondence.

If you require any further information, then please contact me.

Yours sincerely,

Carl Bird

Freedom of Information Unit

West Midlands Police in complying with their statutory duty under sections
1 and 11 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to release the enclosed
information will not breach the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
However, the rights of the copyright owner of the enclosed information
will continue to be protected by law. Applications for the copyright
owner*s written permission to reproduce any part of the attached
information should be addressed to The Force Solicitor, West Midlands
Police Headquarters, Lloyd House, Colmore Circus Queensway, Birmingham, B4
6NQ.

show quoted sections

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
West Midlands Police only: