Dear Sir or Madam,

Last night My colleague and I were refused entry into a night club
on Camberley High Street. He was asked to produce identity to prove
he was over the age of 18. In order to do this he used a MOD Form
90. This is a clear case of discrimination based on employment. I
was directed to a police officer who stated the vast proportion of
drink related crime is committed by Service Personnel in Camberley.
Could you therefore please provide me with a break down of the
number of Service Personnel who have been detained, cautioned or
had criminal prosecutions made against them in comparison to the
civilian population, specifically as a result of drink related
crime.

Yours faithfully,

WO2 Jason Dowle RAMC Recruiting Fuller Block Camberley Surrey GU15
4NP

Dear Sir or Madam,

Further to my request regarding drink related crime involing
Service Personnel. I am only interested in statistics relating to
drink related crime committed on Camberley High Street and the
difference between the number of Service Personnel and civil
community as a direct comparisson from 2005 to 2008 where the
individuals have been detained, cautioned or prosecuted.

Yours sincerely,

WO2 Jason Dowle RAMC Recruiting Camberley Surrey GU15 4NP

<<ACK 165-08-275.pdf>>

Many thanks

Carolyn Mullen
Information Access Co-Ordinator
Information Access Team
Strategic Support Directorate
Surrey Police

Tel: 01483 630728
Fax: 01483 634911
Email: mailto:[email address]
Not Protectively Marked

*Internet communications are not secure and therefore Surrey Police does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. This email and any attachments may be confidential. They may contain privileged information and are intended for the named addressee (s) only. They must not be distributed without our consent. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and delete the message and any attachments from your computer, do not disclose, distribute, or retain this email or any part of it. Unless expressly stated, opinions in this email are those of the individual sender, and not of Surrey Police. We believe but do not warrant that this e-mail and any attachments are virus free. You must therefore take full responsibility for virus checking. Surrey Police reserves the right to monitor all email communications through their networks.*

<<Response 165-08-275.pdf>> <<Surrey Appeals Notice.pdf>>

Many thanks

Carolyn Mullen
Information Access Co-Ordinator
Information Access Team
Strategic Support Directorate
Surrey Police

Tel: 01483 630728
Fax: 01483 634911
Email: mailto:[email address]
Not Protectively Marked

*Internet communications are not secure and therefore Surrey Police does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. This email and any attachments may be confidential. They may contain privileged information and are intended for the named addressee (s) only. They must not be distributed without our consent. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and delete the message and any attachments from your computer, do not disclose, distribute, or retain this email or any part of it. Unless expressly stated, opinions in this email are those of the individual sender, and not of Surrey Police. We believe but do not warrant that this e-mail and any attachments are virus free. You must therefore take full responsibility for virus checking. Surrey Police reserves the right to monitor all email communications through their networks.*