Make and explore Freedom of Information requestsFollow this request
There is 1 person following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Stockport Council says every approach I make to the Council must be through the FOI Officer
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 27 February 2010
Concerns about exposure of 550 young children to high levels of CO2
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 13 January 2010
Yet another banned council taxpayer
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 26 April 2010
Proposed school not big enough to accommodate all the children who need to attend
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 13 January 2010
Proposed Harcourt Street School - where will the school sports day be held
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 17 January 2010
Rising costs of draining the contaminated land at Harcourt Street, Stockport for the proposed school
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 17 January 2010
Has the promised outreach work for the deprived Fir Tree area been costed for the 25 year lifetime of the proposed Harcourt Street School?
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 17 January 2010
Review of capital funding for Harcourt Street project - £6.69 was to be generated from capital receipts but that figure reduced within a year to £1.6 million.
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 17 January 2010
How will escalating costs be covered, given that the Council is having unexpectedly to borrow £4.5 million for the proposed Harcourt Street School?
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 17 January 2010
Costs of compensation under Part 1 of the Land Act 1973 for local residents regarding the proposed school at Harcourt Street
Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) made this Freedom of Information request to Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
The request was refused by Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council.
From: Sheila Oliver (Account suspended)
17 January 2010
Dear Stockport Borough Council,
The Council has admitted the proposed school at Harcourt Street
will increase noise in the area. There will also be light
pollution. There will be a large number of claims from the hundreds
of houses surrounding the development for compensation under Part 1
of the Land Act 1973 for the execution of public works. The Council
will have to pay all reasonable legal costs for the claimants. How
much is the budget which has been set aside to meet these future
costs?
Yours faithfully,
Sheila Oliver
From: FOI Officer
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
25 January 2010
Dear Mrs Oliver,
I am writing in response to your request for information below (ref 2588).
As you have previously been informed, your requests for information about
Harcourt Street are considered to be vexatious under section 14(1) Freedom
of Information Act 2000 and manifestly unreasonable under Regulation
12(4)(b) Environmental Information Regulations 2004 and will not receive a
response. This decision has been through the Council's internal review
process and was upheld. It has also been investigated by the Information
Commissioner's Office at your request; the ICO upheld the Council's
decision in its Decision Notice.
Yours sincerely,
Claire Naven
Claire Naven
Data Protection & Freedom of Information Officer
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
show quoted sections
From: Sheila Oliver (Account suspended)
17 February 2010
Dear Stockport Borough Council,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of Stockport Borough
Council's handling of my FOI request 'Costs of compensation under
Part 1 of the Land Act 1973 for local residents regarding the
proposed school at Harcourt Street'.
Please note that the Information Commission Team Leader has stated
to me in a letter dated 15/2/10:-
... "Notice relates specifically to the request you made on 1st
December 2008 and does not make any finding regarding future
requests. If you have made further requests and these have been
refused you should ask the Council to review their requests and if
following this review you remain unhappy with their response you
can bring a new complaint to the Commissioner."
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/co...
Yours faithfully,
Sheila Oliver
From: FOI Officer
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
19 February 2010
Dear Mrs Oliver,
I am writing in response to your email below (ref 2588).
As we have previously explained to you on a number of occasions, the
Council has already carried out an internal review of its decision to
refuse all your requests on the subject of Harcourt Street on the grounds
that they are vexatious and manifestly unreasonable. Your subsequent
complaint has also been investigated by the Information Commissioner's
Office which issued a Decision Notice and upheld the Council's decision.
On this basis, the Council will not be carrying out an internal review as
it has nothing further to add.
If you wish to pursue a complaint you are entitled to complain to the
Information Commissioner's Office: [1]www.ico.gov.uk.
Yours sincerely,
Claire Naven
Claire Naven
Data Protection & Freedom of Information Officer
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
show quoted sections
From: Sheila Oliver (Account suspended)
22 February 2010
Dear FOI Officer,
Since the far from impartial internal review process at Stockport
Council, the Council has been forced to disclose documents to a
public inquiry which show the entire site to be highly contaminated
and that £5 million in funding is not available, contrary to their
previous assertion - they only disclosed those facts after the ICO
ruling. The Information Commission has said twice that the Council
needs to answer questions on this subject. One has to wonder what
the Council has to hide. I shall make a complaint to the ICO about
this matter.
Yours sincerely,
Sheila Oliver
Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) left an annotation (24 March 2010)
The same people who are refusing to answer questions on this subject are the ones criticised by the Coroner in the following news story:-
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/n...
The Information Commission says I should raise a complaint with Stockport Council, but the Complaints Officer is refusing to respond.
Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) left an annotation (24 March 2010)
"Council bosses decided NOT to hold a wide-ranging investigation into the death of a boy who died after an asthma attack at school, the MEN can reveal.
Stockport council officials considered carrying out a serious case review into the 11-year-old's death THREE times – but each time decided against.
The news came after an inquest jury found a catalogue of errors and neglect by staff at Offerton High School 'significantly contributed' to Sam's death.
He was left to sit in a corridor after suffering the attack while teachers failed to call an ambulance.
Parents Paul and Karen Linton are now considering legal action against the council.
The M.E.N understands officials in charge of safeguarding Stockport children did not believe the case met the criteria for a full serious case review...."
Manchester Evening News
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) left an annotation (26 January 2010)
The Council was told on 14/01/10 by a senior Information Commission complaints officer that I could ask questions on this subject.
I shall be taking this matter to Mr. Thomas, Information Commissioner, himself.
Stockport Council has a lot to conceal, but I shall expose what they are trying to cover up. It doesn't matter how long it takes.
Link to this