Make and explore Freedom of Information requestsFollow this request
There are 2 people following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Confidential Information disclosed by Home Office to BT and Phorm
To Home Office by Phillip Main 8 October 2009
Correspondence between 121Media/Phorm and Home Office 2005
To Home Office by Phillip Main 4 August 2009
Dates of meetings between Home Office and Kip Meek
To Home Office by Phillip Main 28 May 2009
2005 Correspondence between Home Office and BERR/DBIS concerning 121Media/Phorm
To Home Office by Phillip Main 4 August 2009
Fiduciary Duty
To Home Office by William:Sterling (Account suspended) 28 October 2009
OHMS envelope use
To Home Office by Mr Wyllie 7 September 2009
Jacqui Smiths use of the term 'our shared values'.
To Home Office by Paul Perrin 24 March 2009
Claim made on investor forum that Phorm shares are 'government backed'
To Home Office by Phillip Main 20 July 2009
Home Office Organogram
To Home Office by Christopher Stacey LL.B, LL.M 30 April 2010
Talk Talk, another Vexatious Request
To Home Office by Keith Alexander Mallen 6 November 2010
Correspondence between Home Office and PM's Office concerning Phorm/121Media
Phillip Main made this Freedom of Information request to Home Office
Home Office did not have the information requested.
From: Phillip Main
5 June 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Please supply copies of any correspondence between yourselves and
the Prime Ministers Office relating to Phorm/Media121
Yours faithfully,
Phillip Main
From: Pottinger Diana (IMS)
Home Office
10 June 2009
Mr Main
please find attached acknowledgement of your FOI request no 12111
Diana Pottinger Information Access Consultant
Information Management Services, Shared Services Directorate
4th Floor, Seacole Building, Home Office
2 Marsham Street
London SW1P 4DF
[1]www.homeoffice.gov.uk
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
References
Visible links
1. http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/
From: Pottinger Diana (IMS)
Home Office
3 July 2009
Mr Main
please find attached an update on your FOI request
Diana Pottinger Information Access Consultant
Information Management Services, Shared Services Directorate
4th Floor, Seacole Building, Home Office
2 Marsham Street
London SW1P 4DF
[1]www.homeoffice.gov.uk
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
References
Visible links
1. http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/
From: Pottinger Diana (IMS)
Home Office
22 July 2009
Mr Main
please find attached a final response to your FOI request
Diana Pottinger Information Access Consultant
Information Management Services, Shared Services Directorate
4th Floor, Seacole Building, Home Office
2 Marsham Street
London SW1P 4DF
[1]www.homeoffice.gov.uk
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
References
Visible links
1. http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/
From: Phillip Main
22 July 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of Home Office's
handling of my FOI request 'Correspondence between Home Office and
PM's Office concerning Phorm/121Media'.
I cannot believe that no correspondence has passed between these
two offices on such a prominent subject as Phorm. I fail to see
what disclosure of any information that has passed between two
government offices concerning a commercial company can have to do
with the formulation of government policy,not be in the public
interest or be the cause of any damage to national security or the
operation of this government. I am also concerned that Phorm is a
member of UKCISS dealing with aspects of privacy concerning
children and no government department seems to wish to comment or
disclose any information concerning this company.
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/co...
Yours faithfully,
Phillip Main
Phillip Main left an annotation (22 July 2009)
Yet again no department will talk about or disclose any information they have about Phorm.
This system was designed to be invisible and go unnoticed by web users. Why ? It's only purpose is to spy on the browsing habits of web users. Who would want a system like this that is covert and illegal? Why use a system with the capabilities boasted of by its CEO to sell adverts? Rather a bit of overkill I think. Why the reluctance of this government to answer questions on it?
From: Bragaglia John
Home Office
27 July 2009
Dear Mr Main,
Please find attached acknowledgement to your recently requested internal
review.
Yours sincerely,
John Bragaglia
Information Access Consultant
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
From: Bragaglia John
Home Office
20 August 2009
Dear Mr Main,
Please find attached response to your requested internal review.
Yours sincerely,
John Bragaglia
Information Access Consultant
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
Phillip Main left an annotation (20 August 2009)
I think we can take it as read that they may have some information but will not release it. FORMULATION OF GOVERNMENT POLICY is fast becoming the get out clause of choice for not releasing any information on the dealings between this government and Phorm especially when questions are asked that may involve the cabinet office and/or the Prime Minister's Office.
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Phillip Main left an annotation (11 July 2009)
PM
Link to this