Hello! (Sign in or sign up)

Track this request

Act on what you've learnt

Similar requests

Attempts to intimidate people by gathering information Dear Mr Hansen, I am in receipt of your e-mail below, which has been passed to me by our freedom of Information team. I apologise that we have been... Partially successful.
Acknowledgement by Kent Police to David Hansen on 8 September 2008.
Theft of items at climate camp Dear Mr Hansen, FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST I write in connection with your two requests for information received by Kent Police on 7th Augus... Response overdue.
Response by Kent Police to David Hansen on 19 September 2008.
briefing material for Scientology demonstrations I request an internal review of this decision. Please take the following into ac count in this review: - You can redact sensitive information... Partially successful.
Follow up sent to City of London Police by Ganesh Sittampalam on 17 July 2008.

More similar requests

confiscation of property

A Freedom of Information request to Kent Police by Ganesh Sittampalam

The request was successful.

Ganesh Sittampalam

5 August 2008

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please could you send me a copy of any internal advice for officers
stating under what circumstances it is appropriate to confiscate
people's property. I am particularly interested in anything that
explains why you might confiscate a board game, as described in
this news article:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/kent/...

Yours faithfully,

Ganesh Sittampalam

Link to this | Send follow up

Freedom of Information Freedom of Information
Kent Police

6 August 2008


Attachment Your Rights - A Summary - DP.pdf
156K Download View as HTML


Dear Ganesh Sittampalam

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST

Thank you for your request received by Kent Police on 05/08/08andI note
you seek access, in summary, to the following information:

Please could you send me a copy of any internal advice for officers;
stating under what circumstances it is appropriate to confiscate;
people's property. I am particularly interested in anything that;
explains why you might confiscate a board game, as described in; this
news article:; http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/kent/...

Your interest in Kent Police is appreciated and pending a specific
response to your request, I enclose a sheet, which summarises your
rights. Should you have any further inquiries concerning this matter,
please write or contact me on telephone number 01622 654413 quoting the
reference number above.

Yours sincerely,
Karen Hicks
Freedom Of Information Team

Enc.
Your Rights – A Summary

Freedom of Information Team
Data Protection Unit
Kent Police
Force HQ
Sutton Road
Maidstone
Kent ME15 9BZ

E-mail: [Kent Police request email]
Tel: +44 (0)1622 654429/654413
Fax: +44 (0)1622 654437
Internal: 19-4429/4413

This email and any accompanying document(s) contain information from Kent Police, which is confidential or privileged.
The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) or bodies to whom it is addressed.
If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited.
If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by contacting the sender or telephoning 01622 690690.
The copyright in the contents of this email and any enclosure is the property of Kent Police and any unauthorised reproduction or disclosure is contrary to the provisions of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1998.

Link to this | Reply to this message

Ganesh Sittampalam

5 September 2008

Dear Karen Hicks,

Your response is now two days overdue. Please could you deal with
this request immediately?

Yours sincerely,

Ganesh Sittampalam

Link to this | Send follow up

Freedom of Information Freedom of Information
Kent Police

8 September 2008

Dear Ganesh Sittampalam,

We are very conscious that a response to your request is overdue and
for this failure in our service we apologise. This is due to an
unexpected increase in the number of requests made to the Authority. I
can confirm that your request is receiving attention and you can expect
a full response shortly.

Regards,
Lorraine Watson

Freedom of Information Team
Data Protection Unit
Kent Police
Force HQ
Sutton Road
Maidstone
Kent ME15 9BZ

E-mail: [Kent Police request email]
Tel: +44 (0)1622 654429/654413
Fax: +44 (0)1622 654437
Internal: 19-4429/4413

show quoted sections

05/09/08 21:54 >>>
Dear Karen Hicks,

Your response is now two days overdue. Please could you deal with
this request immediately?

Yours sincerely,

Ganesh Sittampalam

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

Ganesh Sittampalam

10 September 2008

Dear Lorraine,

As this is now a week overdue, please could you tell me when you
expect to have a reply?

Yours sincerely,

Ganesh Sittampalam

Link to this | Send follow up

Nigel AMOS PSE 54114
Kent Police

11 September 2008


Attachment attachment.txt
0K Download


Dear Ganesh Sittampalam,

Lorraine and Karen in our Freedom of Information team have made me aware of your e-mail. I am dealing with a number of FOI requests regarding the climate camp, many of which ask for similar, although not necessarily the same information.

I apologise for the delay and I am acquiring the information for all of the requests as quickly as I am able. A huge amount of information has been created after such a large operation and it has yet to be sorted or catalogued. As I am sure you can appreciate, this makes actually locating the information very difficult.

However, the information is beginning to come together and I am confident that I can provide you with a response to your specific request within a few days.

Thank you for your patience, which we very much appreciate.

Regards,
Nigel Amos
FOI Advisor/ Lead Auditor
Information Compliance Unit
Professional Standards
FHQ
01622 654430

show quoted sections

Dear Lorraine,

As this is now a week overdue, please could you tell me when you
expect to have a reply?

Yours sincerely,

Ganesh Sittampalam

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

Freedom of Information Freedom of Information
Kent Police

17 September 2008


Attachment RESPONSE LETTER 6101-2008.pdf
159K Download View as HTML

Attachment RESPONSE LETTER 6101-2008 Appendix 1.pdf
1.4M Download View as HTML

Attachment attachment.txt
0K Download


Dear Ganesh Sittampalam

Please find attached Kent Police response to your FOI request dated 05/08/08, we do apologise for the delay and thank you for your patience.

Best Wishes
Karen Hicks

Freedom of Information Team
Data Protection Unit
Kent Police
Force HQ
Sutton Road
Maidstone
Kent ME15 9BZ

E-mail: [Kent Police request email]
Tel: +44 (0)1622 654429/654413
Fax: +44 (0)1622 654437
Internal: 19-4429/4413

Link to this | Reply to this message

Ganesh Sittampalam

17 September 2008

Dear FOI Team,

Thanks for the response. You explain that the board game was
confiscated because it contained balaclavas. Please could your
clarify whether you just confiscated the balaclavas, or whether you
any other items that were part of the board game too (including the
box, if any), and if so what the justification for that was?

Regards,

Ganesh

Link to this | Send follow up

Nigel AMOS PSE 54114
Kent Police

18 September 2008

Dear Mr Sittampalam,

I'm looking into this. To do so I need to retrieve the specific PACE S1 form, which is one of thousands currently being processed. I suspect this may take me a little while so I must ask you once again for your patience as I investigate this. In the meantime if you have any other questions please do not hesitate to contact me.

Regards,
Nigel Amos
FOI Advisor/ Lead Auditor
Information Compliance Unit
Professional Standards
FHQ
01622 654430

show quoted sections

Dear FOI Team,

Thanks for the response. You explain that the board game was
confiscated because it contained balaclavas. Please could your
clarify whether you just confiscated the balaclavas, or whether you
any other items that were part of the board game too (including the
box, if any), and if so what the justification for that was?

Regards,

Ganesh

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

Nigel AMOS PSE 54114
Kent Police

18 September 2008


Attachment RESPONSE LETTER 6101-2008.pdf
160K Download View as HTML


Dear Ganesh Sittampalam,

I have this morning received further information and so I have amended
our response to you to include this and this is attached.

The relevant, amended, paragraph reads as follows.

In the specific instance of the seizure of three board games, titled
‘War on Terror’, the games contained ‘balaclava’ style head coverings
that could have been employed to conceal identity. During the policing
of the operation, protestors were observed employing such head coverings
as they reconnoitred the power station site during attempts to gain
illegal access. The board games were seized from a vehicle under a
general warrant issued on the 31st August. They were brand new and
sealed and so were seized in their entirety rather than damaging the
property to seize the suspect articles.

Thank you for your patience,

Regards,
Nigel Amos
FOI Advisor/ Lead Auditor
Information Compliance Unit
Professional Standards
FHQ
01622 654430

show quoted sections

17/09/08 20:00 >>>
Dear FOI Team,

Thanks for the response. You explain that the board game was
confiscated because it contained balaclavas. Please could your
clarify whether you just confiscated the balaclavas, or whether
you
any other items that were part of the board game too (including
the
box, if any), and if so what the justification for that was?

Regards,

Ganesh

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

Ganesh Sittampalam

18 September 2008

Dear Nigel Amos,

Thanks, that makes things clear. I appreciate your efforts looking
into this.

Regards,

Ganesh

Link to this | Send follow up

Nigel AMOS PSE 54114
Kent Police

18 September 2008

Dear Ganesh,

No problem, that is what I am here for. I do note that I made an error
below and in the document, that the warrant in fact was served on the
31st July, and not August 31st as stated.

best regards,

Nigel

show quoted sections

18/09/08 14:43 >>>
Dear Nigel Amos,

Thanks, that makes things clear. I appreciate your efforts
looking
into this.

Regards,

Ganesh

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

Ganesh Sittampalam left an annotation (18 September 2008)

The basic summary is that they are entitled to confiscate things that they think will be used to hide the identity of people committing criminal damage etc, the board games contained balaclavas, and they confiscated them in their entirety as they were still shrinkwrapped and they didn't want to damage property.

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)

Ganesh Sittampalam only: Reply to Nigel AMOS PSE 54114 | Request an internal review
Kent Police only: Respond to request