Follow this request
There is 1 person following this request
Offensive? Unsuitable?
Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid for FOI purposes (read more).
If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators
Report this requestAct on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Concessionary travel passes
To Lewes District Council by Robert Eriksohn 29 January 2009
Concessionary travel passes
To Horsham District Council by Robert Eriksohn 29 January 2009
Concessionary travel passes
To Oxford City Council by Robert Eriksohn 29 January 2009
Concessionary travel passes
To Chiltern District Council by Robert Eriksohn 29 January 2009
Concessionary travel passes
To Canterbury City Council by Robert Eriksohn 29 January 2009
Concessionary travel passes
To Scarborough Borough Council by Robert Eriksohn 30 January 2009
Concessionary travel passes
To East Hampshire District Council by Robert Eriksohn 29 January 2009
Concessionary travel passes
To Stoke on Trent City Council by Robert Eriksohn 30 January 2009
Concessionary travel passes
To North Hertfordshire District Council by Robert Eriksohn 30 January 2009
Concessionary travel passes
To Shepway District Council by Robert Eriksohn 29 January 2009
Concessionary travel passes
Robert Eriksohn made this Freedom of Information request to Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
The request was successful.
From: Robert Eriksohn
29 January 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
I would like to make a request as regards to the concessionary
travel arrangements in your authority under the terms of Freedom of
Information Act.
1. Does your authority provide concessionary travel passes to those
individuals registered with their local Social Services department
as disabled on the grounds of being a mental health user or
survivor?
2. If your authority does have such arrangements why was the
decision taken to extend the scheme in this way and what
arrangements are in place?
3. If your authority does have such arrangements does you authority
have some other arrangement beyond the statuary minimum to provide
passes to those with mental health issues?
4. If your authority does not have such arrangements why was the
decision taken not to extend the scheme in this way and has
consideration been given to extending the scheme in this way in the
future?
5. Would it be possible to provide copies of any relevant policy
documents you may have.
Your assistance is greatly appreciated.
Yours faithfully,
Robert Eriksohn
From: Martin Tubbs
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
30 January 2009
Dear Mr Eriksohn
I am writing to acknowledge receipt of your information request. It has
been allocated reference FOI61270.
The Freedom of Information Act 2000 provides public authorities with 20
working days to process requests - this period expires on 26 February 2009
Regards
Martin Tubbs
Information and Compliance Manager
Legal Services
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Town Hall
St Ives Road
Maidenhead
SL6 1RF
show quoted sections
From: Jennifer Shaw
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
2 February 2009
To :Robert Eriksohn
From :Jennifer Shaw
Sent :2 February 2009
Subject:Freedom of Information request FOI61270
Dear Mr Eriksohn
Further to your Freedom of Information request FOI61270, please find your
questions and our responses below:
1. Does your authority provide concessionary travel passes to those
individuals registered with their local Social Services department as
disabled on the grounds of being a mental health user or survivor?
RBWM complies with the National Concessionary Bus Travel Scheme when
assessing eligibility. Ref: DfT (February 2008) Guidance to Local
Authorities on Assessing Eligibility of Disabled People in England for
Concessionary Bus Travel. Section 58, p.13: 'There are a number of
categories of 'severe mental disorder' under which people may qualify'.
Individuals are assessed on a case-by-case basis as eligibility usually
depends on the severity of the condition which must also be permanent.
2. If your authority does have such arrangements why was the decision
taken to extend the scheme in this way and what arrangements are in place?
n/a
3. If your authority does have such arrangements does you authority have
some other arrangement beyond the statuary minimum to provide passes to
those with mental health issues?
n/a
4. If your authority does not have such arrangements why was the decision
taken not to extend the scheme in this way and has consideration been
given to extending the scheme in this way in the future?
The decision was that RBWM would follow the National Concessionary Bus
Travel Scheme eligibility guidance. No consideration has been given to
extending the scheme beyond this for mental health users or survivors.
5. Would it be possible to provide copies of any relevant policy documents
you may have.
As referenced above:
[1]http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/regional/buses...
This concludes your request FOI61270.
Please contact me if I can be of any further assistance.
If you are dissatisfied in any way you may complain to Martin Tubbs,
Information and Compliance Manager by email [email address] or
write to the address below.
Once you have exhausted the complaints procedure you may appeal to the
Information Commissioner's Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow,
Cheshire SK9 5AF
Yours Sincerely
Jennifer Shaw
Freedom of Information Officer
Legal Services
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Town Hall
St Ives Rd
MAIDENHEAD
SL6 1RF
Tel: 01628 79 (6029)
show quoted sections
References
Visible links
1. http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/regional/buses...
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests




