Concerns about Suitability of Elective Home Education provision

L Thorn made this Freedom of Information request to Islington Borough Council

The request was successful.

From: L Thorn

3 August 2009

Dear Sir or Madam,

I read that you had 52 children registered as Electively Home
Educated in 2009. This request concerns children currently
registered as receiving EHE in Islington - for the purposes of this
FOI request , these children are either de-registered from a school
or have never been registered with a school.

A) I would like to know of these children how many are there where
the visiting person has concerns that a 'suitable' education is
being provided?

B) I would also appreciate it if this information could be broken
down into categories:

1. whether they feel that no education is taking place?

2. whether they feel that the philosophy of education is inadequate
-for example in the case of autonomous or child led learning , that
particular child is not appearing to be learning 'enough'?

3. whether there are concerns because the family have not
implemented a structured approached?

4.or whether the fact that the national Curriculum is not being
followed is causing concern?

C)If there are children in the above 4 categories , please indicate
if further steps are being taken- for example ,issuance of a School
Attendance Order?

D)Please also indicate if any any Education Supervision Orders are
currently in court for this population.?

E) Please can you confirm whether any children who fit into the
above categories of concern about 'educational provision
suitability' would also therefore be referred to Social Services?

F) Lastly is it possible in your Local Authority that Social
Services are involved with a family but that The EHE department do
not know of this involvement (This involvement would be on an
on-going basis rather than a one off referral which is found to be
of no genuine concern)

Yours faithfully,

L Thorn

Link to this

From: FOIA
Islington Borough Council

6 August 2009

Thank you for your Freedom of Information Act request received on 3 August
2009. Your request has been processed, and your unique reference number is
273345. Please make note of this reference number should you need to
contact us about your request.

Our team has sent your request to the appropriate service area within
Islington Council, and an officer from that team will respond directly to
your request.

If you have any questions, please contact us by email at
[1][Islington Borough Council request email] or by phone on 020 7527 1789.

Kind regards

Andy Lindup
Information Officer
Information Governance
Corporate Resources
Islington Council
60 Highbury New Park, London N5 2DJ

Tel: 020 7527 2754
Alternative contact: Kit Good 020 7527 1789

[2]www.islington.gov.uk

show quoted sections

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[Islington Borough Council request email]
2. http://www.islington.gov.uk/
3. http://www.islington.gov.uk/freedomofinf...
4. mailto:[Islington Borough Council request email]
5. http://www.islington.gov.uk/

Link to this

From: Witham, Ken
Islington Borough Council

20 August 2009


Attachment 273345 Elective Home Education.doc
129K Download View as HTML


Hi, Tony

I think you're right ... I've cc'd this note to the full address but,
just in case there's a further error, please note that:

The query was from L.Thorn, and asked:
"I read that you had 52 children registered as Electively Home Educated
in 2009. This request concerns children currently registered as
receiving EHE in Islington - for the purposes of this FOI request ,
these children are either de-registered from a school or have never been
registered with a school. A) I would like to know of these children how
many are there where the visiting person has concerns that a 'suitable'
education is being provided? B) I would also appreciate it if this
information could be broken down into categories: 1. whether they feel
that no education is taking place? 2. whether they feel that the
philosophy of education is inadequate -for example in the case of
autonomous or child led learning , that particular child is not
appearing to be learning 'enough'? 3. whether there are concerns because
the family have not implemented a structured approached? 4.or whether
the fact that the national Curriculum is not being followed is causing
concern? C)If there are children in the above 4 categories , please
indicate if further steps are being taken- for example ,issuance of a
School Attendance Order? D)Please also indicate if any any Education
Supervision Orders are currently in court for this population.? E)
Please can you confirm whether any children who fit into the above
categories of concern about 'educational provision suitability' would
also therefore be referred to Social Services? F) Lastly is it possible
in your Local Authority that Social Services are involved with a family
but that The EHE department do not know of this involvement (This
involvement would be on an on-going basis rather than a one off referral
which is found to be of no genuine concern)"

With best wishes

Ken Witham
Senior Officer: Policy, Communications and Organisational Development,
Cambridge Education @ Islington,
222, Upper Street,
London,
N1 1XR

tel: 0207 527 5545
fax: 0207 527 5903
email: [email address]

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: L Thorn

21 August 2009

Dear Mr Witham,

Thank you for your response. The respondent noted that in
Islington, there were seven children who were deemed by the
Education Inspector not be receiving a suitable education. However,
there were only two children who were viewed as receiving no
education, that leaves five children for whom there are concerns
about the suitability of education, but the categories of concerns
do not fall in the three further categories I had suggested.

It is evident that Islington does not classify suitability of
education in the same way in which I posed my
question, namely:

1. whether they feel that no education is taking place?

2. whether they feel that the philosophy of education is inadequate
-for example in the case of autonomous or child led learning , that
particular child is not appearing to be learning 'enough'?

3. whether there are concerns because the family have not
implemented a structured approached?

4.or whether the fact that the national Curriculum is not being
followed is causing concern?

I felt that these four categories covered the whole gamut of
possible concerns about suitability of education. Since there are
five children for whom Islington has concerns, but those concerns
do
not fall into any of the four categories, please could you tell me
how Islington characterises 'suitable and efficient education' and
the concerns the Islington Education Inspector has about the
educational provision of these five children. This would be most
helpful to me in
understanding what may be a more widespread problem in HE
provision.

Yours sincerely,

L Thorn

Link to this

From: Witham, Ken
Islington Borough Council

21 August 2009

Thank you for your email, which I have forward to the officer who
responded to your original request, asking that she respond direct to
you regarding the additional points you have raised.

Ken Witham
Senior Officer: Policy, Communications and Organisational Development,
Cambridge Education @ Islington,
222, Upper Street,
London,
N1 1XR

tel: 0207 527 5545
fax: 0207 527 5903
email: [email address]

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: Witham, Ken
Islington Borough Council

25 August 2009

Dear Mr/Ms Thorn,

Jackie Headley, Team Manager for our Education Welfare Service, and the
officer who responded to your original request, has asked me to forward
you the following information in respect of your follow-up enquiry.

"The Consultant Inspector assesses the suitability of the education
being provided based on age, aptitude and ability of the child, if a
child has special educational needs these need to be taken into account.

The philosophy of the education is not assessed and parents are not
required to follow the national curriculum.

The other five families listed were assessed as requiring further visit,
as the education being provided did not yet meet the needs of the child.
However the Consultant Inspector felt that they were going in the right
direction and required more time to produce further work that
demonstrated the education was suitable. Those families are then
visited again to assess whether they have taken on the advice and
produced the work requested.

Two of the families felt that they were not happy with their current
choice and were actively seeking a return to a mainstream school.

There can be many other reasons that education provision could be deemed
as unsuitable, such as lack/no supervision of work, failure to
mark/assess progress, failure to take into account a child's specific
educational needs.

I hope this answers your questions in full. "

Ken Witham
Senior Officer: Policy, Communications and Organisational Development,
Cambridge Education @ Islington,
222, Upper Street,
London,
N1 1XR

tel: 0207 527 5545
fax: 0207 527 5903
email: [email address]

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: L Thorn

7 September 2009

Dear Witham, Ken,

Thank you for your response. I was surprised to see from your
answer that Cambridge Education @ Islington requires parents to
mark work and formally assess the progress of their children since
this is not a requirement in law, nor of the govt guidelines for HE
published in 2007. Why does Cambridge Education feel it necessary
to take this, essentially ultra vires, approach?

Yours sincerely,

L Thorn

Link to this

From: Witham, Ken
Islington Borough Council

10 September 2009

Dear Mr/Ms Thorn

The officer from our Education Welfare team who has provided the
responses to your previous requests has contacted me to ask that I pass
on the following information:

"Many of our families who home educate use specific books or internet
programmes which enables the parent to mark work produced by their
child. Parents need to be aware of their child's progress, whether the
child is struggling with the work or not.

The Consultant Inspector advises parents and guides them towards
suitable materials or programmes that enable them to assess the progress
their child has made.

It can be very difficult to maintain momentum or focus if a child
receives no feedback on their work. Therefore parents are asked to
ensure they have an overview of their child's progress, it also informs
what type/level of work is required next.

However our main concern is that all the children are in receipt of a
suitable education appropriate to their age, ability, aptitude and any
special needs.

Islington does not have a combative approach to parents who home educate
their children and offer support and advice via the Consultant
Inspector. In the main our parents have not found the process of
registering and visits difficult."

We trust that this now draws a conclusion to this particular enquiry.

Ken Witham
Senior Officer: Policy, Communications and Organisational Development,
Cambridge Education @ Islington,
222, Upper Street,
London,
N1 1XR

tel: 0207 527 5545
fax: 0207 527 5903
email: [email address]

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: L Thorn

10 September 2009

Dear Witham, Ken,

Thank you for taking the time to explain Cambridge Education's
approach to home education and home educators to me so fully.

Yours sincerely,

L Thorn

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Islington Borough Council only: