Common Purpose : Norwich Prison

John Walker made this Freedom of Information request to HM Prison Service

The request was refused by HM Prison Service.

From: John Walker

22 June 2008

Dear Sir or Madam,

By "Common Purpose", I mean the training organisation of that name:
http://www.commonpurpose.org/home.aspx

Common Purpose Norfolk has use of premises at c/o HMP & YOI
Norwich, Room 1, The Facade, Knox Road, Norwich, Norfolk, NR1 4LU

Please supply the following details:

1. the date when Common Purpose first occupied these premises

2. how much rent Common Purpose has paid for these premises,
together with copies of all invoices

3. who first authorised the use of HMP facilities by Common Purpose

4. details of what these Norwich premises are used for

5. copies of all correspondence (ie letters, emails and attachments
and transcripts of telephone conversations) between HM Prison
Service and Common Purpose regarding the use of this Norwich
facility

6. copies of all correspondence (ie letters, emails and attachments
and transcripts of telephone conversations) between HM Prison
Service and Common Purpose regarding the use of ANY OTHER HM Prison
Service facility

Yours faithfully,

John Walker

Link to this

From: Keysell David

21 July 2008


Attachment Walker 9354.doc
55K Download View as HTML


Dear Mr Walker

Please see the attached letter with reference to your FOI request.

Thanks

David Keysell

Ministry of Justice

Open Government Unit

Room 330

Abell House

John Islip Street
London

SW1P 4LH

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

Link to this

From: Lansdale Hazel
HM Prison Service

11 August 2008

Dear Mark,

Just wondered whether you have had any luck with the question below?

"Common Purpose Norfolk has use of premises at c/o HMP & YOI

Norwich, Room 1, The Façade, Knox Road, Norwich, Norfolk, NR1 4LU

1. the date when Common Purpose first occupied these premises

    

2. how much rent Common Purpose has paid for these premises,

    together with copies of all invoices

    

3. who first authorised the use of HMP facilities by Common Purpose

    

4. details of what these Norwich premises are used for

    

5. copies of all correspondence (ie letters, emails and attachments

    and transcripts of telephone conversations) between HM Prison

    Service and Common Purpose regarding the use of this Norwich

    facility

    

6. copies of all correspondence (ie letters, emails and attachments

    and transcripts of telephone conversations) between HM Prison

    Service and Common Purpose regarding the use of ANY OTHER HM Prison

    Service facility."

Unfortunately we will be unable to send a response to your request by the
end of today, as this is taking longer than we previously anticipated. We
shall however endeavour to send you a full reply by 21^st August 2008. I
can only apologise for any inconvenience this delay might cause.

I thank you for your continuing patience in this matter.

Thank you

Hazel Lansdale

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

Link to this

From: Keysell David

21 August 2008


Attachment Walker 9354.doc
56K Download View as HTML


Dear Mr Walker

Please see the attached letter with reference to your FOI request.

Thanks

David Keysell

Ministry of Justice

Open Government Unit

Room 330

Abell House

John Islip Street
London

SW1P 4LH

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

Link to this

From: John Walker

21 August 2008

Dear Keysell David,

"Regrettably, we will be unable to send a response to your request
by close of play today as this is taking longer than we had
expected. We shall however endeavour to send you a full reply by
1st October 2008."

This is obviously not good enough. I suppose I'd better be patient.
If it isn't here by 1st October 2008, I shall take my complaint to
the Information Commissioner.

Yours sincerely,

Link to this

From: John Walker

21 August 2008

Dear Sir or Madam,

I require an explanation for this delay.

Yours sincerely,

John Walker

Link to this

From: Keysell David

26 August 2008

Hi Mr Walker

The reason for the delay in providing a full response to your FOI request is that we are experiencing difficulty in obtaining the information you require. Once we have the information in full, we will consider it under the FOI Act then provide a full response. We apologise for the delay this is causing.

Thanks

David Keysell
Ministry of Justice
Open Government Unit
Room 330
Abell House
John Islip Street
London
SW1P 4LH
 

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: John Walker

22 September 2008

Dear Keysell David,

Your delay in responding to my request is completely unacceptable.

It has come to my attention that Common Purpose has been
interfering with other FOI requests made about Norwich Prison:
http://www.cpexposed.com/archive/results...

Please supply

1. copies of ALL correspondence (email, letter, phone etc) that
your department has had either internally or externally regarding
this FOI request of mine.

2. an assessment of the chances of you providing the requested
information by 1st October

Yours sincerely,

John Walker

Link to this

From: Keysell David

1 October 2008


Attachment Walker 9354.doc
56K Download View as HTML


Dear Mr Walker

Please see the attached letter with reference to your FOI request.

Thanks

David Keysell

Ministry of Justice

Open Government Unit

Room 330

Abell House

John Islip Street
London

SW1P 4LH

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

Link to this

From: John Walker

1 October 2008

Dear Keysell David,

You say, "Regrettably, we will be unable to send a response to your
request by close of play today as this is taking longer than we had
expected. We shall however endeavour to send you a full reply by
3rd November 2008. We apologise for any inconvenience this delay
might cause and thank you for your continuing patience in this
matter."

This is appalling.

Ref my request of 22 September 2008, I still require copies of ALL
correspondence (email, letter, phone etc) that your department has
had either internally or externally regarding this FOI request of
mine.

Surely you can manage that.

Yours sincerely,

John Walker

Link to this

From: John Walker

8 November 2008

Dear Sir or Madam,

Well? Where is the response?

Yours sincerely,

John Walker

Link to this

From: John Walker

8 November 2008

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of HM Prison Service's
handling of my FOI request 'Common Purpose : Norwich Prison'.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/co...

Yours sincerely,

John Walker

Link to this

From: Hunt, Paul

12 November 2008

Dear John,

Thank you for your e-mail.

In order to reply to your question can you please provide the following
information.

Date Request was made:

The case number:

Brief description of request:

Please provide this information along with your request below and we
will then respond.

We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause.

Regards

Paul Hunt
Data Access & Compliance Unit
Postal Point 1.41, Zone C
102 Petty France
London, SW1H 9AJ

Tel 0203 334 3249
Fax 0203 334 2245
[email address]
www.justice.gsi.gov.uk

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: John Walker

12 November 2008

Dear Hunt, Paul,

The delay in providing this information has gone beyond a joke and
is totally unacceptable.

I have already contacted the Information Commissioners and shall
contact them again and request further action UNLESS the
information that I requested is provided IN FULL by 1st December
2008 - that is 1st December 2008, not some vague time next year.

The entire story of this request can be seen here:

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/co...

Date Request was made: 22 June 2008

The case number: FOI 9354

Brief description of request: Common Purpose Norfolk has use of
premises at c/o HMP & YOI
Norwich, Room 1, The Facade, Knox Road, Norwich, Norfolk, NR1 4LU

Please supply the following details:

1. the date when Common Purpose first occupied these premises

2. how much rent Common Purpose has paid for these premises,
together with copies of all invoices

3. who first authorised the use of HMP facilities by Common Purpose

4. details of what these Norwich premises are used for

5. copies of all correspondence (ie letters, emails and attachments
and transcripts of telephone conversations) between HM Prison
Service and Common Purpose regarding the use of this Norwich
facility

6. copies of all correspondence (ie letters, emails and attachments
and transcripts of telephone conversations) between HM
PrisonService and Common Purpose regarding the use of ANY OTHER HM
PrisonService facility

Yours sincerely,

John Walker

Link to this

From: Hunt, Paul

20 November 2008

Dear John

Thank you for your e-mail relating to your case reference 9354.

The case officer assigned to this case is David Keysell

We will respond to you in due course. Unfortunately at this time I can't
give you a more precise timescale.

You may wish to contact David on Tel 0203 334 3238 or by e-mail
[1][email address] who may be able to help you further.

I am sorry you are unhappy with the service provided. Before the ICO will
deal with a complaint from you it is our understanding that you are first
required to have requested an internal review of your case from ourselves.
The independent review process in relation to Freedom of Information
requests is as follows:

If an individual is dissatisfied with a response they may request an
independent internal review of the handling of a request. A request for
internal review should be made in writing, within 40 working days of the
date of the response, by submitting details of the complaint and quoting
our reference number to the address below.

Data Access & Compliance Unit

Postal Point 1.41, Zone C

102 Petty France

London, SW1H 9AJ

Or by e-mail to [2][email address]

A request for an internal review may also be made if the requestor is
dissatisfied with the handling of request which has not been responded to.
This should also be made in writing as above.

During the independent review the department's handling of the information
request will be reassessed by staff who were not involved in providing the
original response, or who are dealing with a request which is awaiting a
response. If the matter remains unresolved after an internal review there
is a right of complaint to the Information Commissioner as established by
s.50 of the FOI Act.

I hope this has answered your question. If you have any queries please do
not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely

Regards

Paul Hunt
Ministry of Justice | Data Access & Compliance Unit
Postal Point 1.41, Zone C | 102 Petty France | London SW1H 9AJ

Tel 0203 334 3249 Fax 0203 334 2245
[3][email address]

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: Banaghan, Katharine

2 April 2009


Attachment RESPONSE FOI 9354.doc
61K Download View as HTML


Mr Walker

Please find attached response to your request for information.

Kind regards,

Katharine

Katharine Banaghan

Data Access and Compliance Unit
Ministry of Justice

<<RESPONSE FOI 9354.doc>>

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the
addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not
permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be
intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when
deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read
at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

Link to this

From: John Walker

2 April 2009

Dear Banaghan, Katharine,

Are you seriously telling me that an organisation (Common Purpose)
that is, on the surface at least, not a government body can have
use of prison facilities with NO record in writing at all?

I demand an internal review into this and answers to the following
questions:

1. What is your department's policy regarding allowing
non-governmental bodies to use prison property and is it normal
policy not to keep records?

2. What is the name of the governor who authorised this use of
Norwich Prison by Common Purpose?

3. What job are they doing now?

4. What efforts have you made to contact them and get answers to
the questions made in the original FOI request?

5. If efforts have not been made to contact them, why not?

6. Who else in Norwich Prison knew about the use of these
facilities by Common Purpose? Have you asked them the questions as
set out in the original FOI request? If not, why not?

And I very sincerely hope this does not take you another nine
months to answer.

Yours sincerely,

John Walker

Link to this

From: John Walker

3 April 2009

Dear Sir or Madam,

I believe that the Governor of Norwich Prison for at least part of
the time that the premises were occupied by Common Purpose was
James Shanley, a Common Purpose "graduate" and now governor of HMP
Birmingham.

He should know some of the answers.

Yours sincerely,

John Walker

Link to this

From: Data Access & Compliance Unit

14 April 2009


Attachment Acknowledgement 59033 Walker.doc
50K Download View as HTML


Dear Mr Walker,

Please find attached the acknowledgement to your Internal Review request.

Yours sincerely,

Kate Holliday
(On behalf of Stephen Hunt)

<<Acknowledgement - 59033 - Walker.doc>>

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the
addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not
permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be
intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when
deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read
at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

Link to this

From: Data Access & Compliance Unit

16 June 2009


Attachment 59912 Walker.DOC.doc
50K Download View as HTML


<<59912 Walker.DOC>> Dear Mr Walker,

Please find attached your acknowledgement to your Freedom of Information
request.

Yours sincerely

Hannah Law

(Sent on behalf of Mosun Hassan (Miss))

Data Access & Compliance Unit

Postal Point 6.25, Zone B

102 Petty France

London SW1H 9AJ

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: John Walker

16 June 2009

Dear Data Access & Compliance Unit,

The repeated delays in replying to my requests about Common Purpose
and Norwich Prison are pathetic and completely unacceptable.

I require, expect and demand substantive answers to my questions as
there appears to have been abuse of public funds and also a
possible breach of security in connection with allowing Common
Purpose access to facilities at Norwich Prison.

Yours sincerely,

John Walker

Link to this

From: Data Access & Compliance Unit

16 June 2009

This is an Auto Reply from the Data Access & Compliance Unit.

Thank you for your e-mail.

If your message was a request for information please be advised that your
request is being dealt with and you will receive a written ackowledgement
shortly.

Data Access & Compliance Unit

Information Directorate

Ministry of Justice
6th Floor, Zone B, Postal Point 6.23
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ

Fax: 0203 334 2245

E-mail: [email address]

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the
addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not
permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be
intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when
deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read
at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

Link to this

From: Hunt, Stephen (DACU - Manchester)

30 June 2009


Attachment 59033 IR Response Mr J Walker.doc
82K Download View as HTML


Dear Mr Walker

Please see the attached letter relating to your request for an internal
review.

I would like to apologise for the delay in responding.

<<59033 - IR Response - Mr J Walker.doc>>
I have copied the text below in case you have any difficulty in opening
the attachment.

Dear Mr Walker

Subject: Request for information - Internal Review

Thank you for your email, dated 2 April 2009, in which you requested an
internal review of the decision on your Freedom of Information (FOI)
request dated 22 June 2008.

I have now completed my review and can confirm that I am upholding the
original decision of 2 April 2009. However, I do accept that a further
section of the FOI Act should have been quoted in that response.

On 22 June 2008, you requested the following information:

1 - the date when Common Purpose first occupied these premises;
2 - how much rent Common Purpose has paid for these premises, together
with copies of all invoices;
3 - who first authorised the use of HMP facilities by Common Purpose;
4 - details of what these Norwich premises are used for;
5 - copies of all correspondence (ie letters, emails and attachments and
transcripts of telephone conversations) between HM Prison Service and
Common Purpose regarding the use of the Norwich facility; and
6 - copies of all correspondence (ie letters, emails and attachments and
transcripts of telephone conversations) between HM Prison Service and
Common Purpose regarding the use of any other HM Prison Service facility.

The Department responded on 2 April 2009, advising you that no information
was held in relation to elements one to five of your request, and that to
answer element six would exceed the cost limit under the terms of Section
12 of the Act.

During my review, I have determined that no recorded information is held
in respect of elements one to five of your request. As mentioned in our
response of 2 April 2009, the decision to allow Common Purpose to use
facilities at HMP & YOI Norwich was taken by a former Governor and was a
verbal agreement. Therefore, I am satisfied that the original decision in
respect of these elements was correct.

I am also satisfied that the cost limit would have been exceeded in
answering element six of your request. However, I do accept that a
specific subsection of Section 12 of the Act should have been cited, and
that a demonstration of how the cost limit would be exceeded would have
been beneficial to you.

In element six, you have asked for copies of all correspondence (ie
letters, emails and attachments and transcripts of telephone
conversations) between HM Prison Service and Common Purpose regarding the
use of any other HM Prison Service facility. In order to answer this
question, it would be necessary to contact 138 HM Prison Service
locations.

Section 12(2) of the Act, exempts a public authority from its obligations
under Section 1(1) - the duty to confirm if the information being
requested is held, if to provide that confirmation alone would exceed the
cost limit.

A number of HM Prison Service locations were asked to estimate how long it
would take to conduct reasonable searches at their location. Responses
range from 20 minutes to one hour. It was felt that 30 minutes would be an
acceptable average time for conducting these searches for cost
calculations. Applying the quickest time for conducting searches would
also exceed the cost limit as is demonstrated below.

138 locations to be searched at 30 minutes per location = 4140 minutes (69
hours).
138 locations to be searched at 20 minutes per location = 2760 minutes (46
hours).

The cost limit is set at £600, which represents one person spending 3.5
working days in locating, extracting and collating the information being
requested, or, for the purposes of Section 12(2), determining if the
information being requested is held.

You also raised further questions in your request for an internal review,
which are being treated as new requests for information and will be
responded to separately.

If you are dissatisfied with the findings of this review, you have a right
to apply to the Information Commissioner. The address for the Information
Commissioner is:

Information Commissioner's Office
Wycliffe House
Water Lane
Wilmslow
Cheshire
SK9 5AF

Internet: [1]http://www.ico.gov.uk

Yours sincerely

Stephen Hunt
Freedom of Information Officer / Data Protection Officer
Data Access and Compliance Unit
Information Directorate
Ministry of Justice
5th Floor, Boulton House
17-21 Chorlton Street
Manchester
M1 3HY
Tel: 0161 238 6191
Fax: 0161 238 6161

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the
addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not
permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be
intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when
deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read
at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.

References

Visible links
1. http://www.ico.gov.uk/

Link to this

From: Ladva, Hansa [NOMS]

6 August 2009


Attachment 59912 Walker Common Purpose Norwich.doc
64K Download View as HTML


Dear Mr Walker

I attach a response to your recent FOI request.

Regards,
Hansa

<<59912-Walker-Common Purpose-Norwich.doc>>

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: John Walker

6 August 2009

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of HM Prison Service's
handling of my FOI request 'Common Purpose : Norwich Prison'.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/co...

This request was started on 22 June 2008 and the way that it has
been handled is appalling. I request an independent review into the
way it was handled and the refusal to answer my questions.

Yours faithfully,

John Walker

Link to this

From: Data Access & Compliance Unit

10 August 2009


Attachment 60740 Walker.doc
50K Download View as HTML


Dear Mr Walker,

Please find attached your acknowledgement to your Freedom of Information
request.

Yours sincerely

Hannah Law

(Sent on behalf of Hannah Wright)

Data Access & Compliance Unit

Postal Point 6.25, Zone B

102 Petty France

London SW1H 9AJ

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: Wright, Hannah

8 September 2009


Attachment Mr Walker Internal Review.doc
57K Download View as HTML


Dear Mr Walker,

Please find attached a response to your request for an Internal Review.

Yours sincerely,

Hannah Wright
Ministry of Justice | Data Access & Compliance Unit

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Link to this

Spiffy of Wirral left an annotation ( 8 September 2009)

They dont want you to know. Interesting to note that 138 prisons have been used for Common Purpose meetings.

Link to this

From: John Walker

9 September 2009

Dear Wright, Hannah,

Your refusal to answer my questions honestly is a disgrace.

Yours sincerely,

John Walker

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
HM Prison Service only: