Common Purpose

Caroline Carter made this Freedom of Information request to British Transport Police

The request was partially successful.

From: Caroline Carter

28 July 2008

Dear Sir or Madam,

This is a follow up request sent to Mr Brian Coleman on 16th July
08.

As Mr Coleman has not acknowledged receipt of my FOI I have decided
to make the same request via this web site.

Would you please supply me with the following information under the
Freedom of Information Act?

1. Copies of all email traffic between Ellie Bird and Common
Purpose
from January 2008 to date?

Please note that I am not interested in personal emails between Ms
Bird and Common Purpose only e-mails and attachments that relate to
the training of BTP staff, which I understand Ms Bird deals with.

Yours faithfully,

C Carter
152 Brighton Road
South Croydon
CR2 6AE

Link to this

From: Osborne, Vanessa
British Transport Police

28 July 2008

Dear Ms Carter,

BTP acknowledge receipt of your Freedom of Information request as below.
We will respond in due course.

Best regards,

Vanessa Osborne
DP and FOI Co-ordinator

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: Caroline Carter

3 September 2008

Dear Osborne, Vanessa,

This is my second request for information that has been ignored.
Are you aware that under the Freedom of Information Act you should
have replied by 27th August and are now breaking the law.

Yours sincerely,

C Carter

Link to this

From: Harry, Elliot
British Transport Police

27 April 2009


Attachment FW Common Purpose Summary so far...html
32K Download

Attachment image001.gif
5K Download

Attachment FW Common Purpose 20 20 2008.html
11K Download

Attachment 2020brochure2008.pdf
835K Download View as HTML

Attachment Whatis2020 1.doc
37K Download View as HTML


Dear Mrs Carter,

I write in connection with your request for information, asking for the
following information:

1. Copies of all email traffic between Ellie Bird and Common Purpose from
January 2008 to date?

Please note that I am not interested in personal emails between Ms Bird
and Common Purpose only e-mails and attachments that relate to the
training of BTP staff, which I understand Ms Bird deals with.

Please accept our apologies for the delay in responding to your request.
Your request has been considered and as directed in Section 1 of the
Freedom of Information Act, we can confirm that we do hold the information
requested. Please find two emails attached that relate to training of BTP
staff. We have decided to remove some personally identifying data under
the exemptions listed below.

Section 17 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 requires the British
Transport Police, when refusing to provide information, to provide the
applicant with a notice which:

(a) states that fact,

(b) specifies the exemption(s) in question, and

(c) states (if not otherwise apparent) why the exemption applies.

The exemptions applicable to the information requested are:

Section 38 - Health and Safety

Section 40(2) - Personal Information

These exemptions apply for the following reasons:

o Section 38: The information, if released, may be likely to endanger
the mental health of an individual

o Section 40(2): Some of the information requested is third party data
and disclosure would breach the Data Protection principles.

Public Interest Test

Both exemptions used here are qualified and therefore a consideration of
the public interest must be made when examining whether to disclose
information or not. The public interest is defined as what is in the best
interests of the public, not what may be of interest to the public. In
order to make a judgement about the public interest considerations for
this request I have drawn up a list both for and against disclosure:-

In Favour of Disclosure:

. Transparency and accountability - openness in regard to police
policy and accountability of those in positions of responsibility. This
also applies to spending of public funds and use of resources.

In Favour of Non-Disclosure:

. Members of staff do not have an expectation of their personal
information being used in a manner other than that for which it was given
(i.e for records kept by their employer) and where it would not be
normally disclosed in the line of their duties.

. Disclosure of personal information of staff working for third
parties, especially where the third party is not a public body and
therefore does not have to comply with Freedom of Information law, would
also breach Data Protection principles.

. A person would not expect their name to be released into the
public domain because they have attended a training course. Any undue
public attention following disclosure could adversely affect the mental
health of an individual.

It is therefore considered for the reasons outlined above that the public
interest in withholding the information outweighs the public interest in
disclosing it.

For further information and guidance, please see the following document
provided by the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO):

[1]http://www.btp.police.uk/pdf/FOI_publica...

British Transport Police provides you the right to request a
re-examination of your case under its review procedure. If you decide to
request such a review and having followed British Transport Police's full
process you are still dissatisfied, then you have the right to direct your
comments to the Information Commissioner ([2]www.ico.gov.uk) who will give
it consideration.

I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your interest in
British Transport Police.

Yours sincerely,

Elliot Harry

Freedom of Information Officer

Information Standards Unit

British Transport Police

show quoted sections

Link to this

John Booth left an annotation (25 May 2010)

RE: -

The exemptions applicable to the information requested are:

Section 38 - Health and Safety
Section 40(2) - Personal Information

These exemptions apply for the following reasons:

o Section 38: The information, if released, may be likely to endanger
the mental health of an individual

o Section 40(2): Some of the information requested is third party data
and disclosure would breach the Data Protection principles.

Comment: -

It seems to me that anyone in contact with common purpose likely to endanger
their mental health as it is common knowledge they use N.L.P (Nero linguistic programming)

How can disclosure of these facts endanger
their mental health?

I would certainly appeal this one.

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
British Transport Police only: