Commissioning of Independent Investigation
A Freedom of Information request to Wirral Borough Council by Natasha Eubank
Waiting for an internal review by Wirral Borough Council of their handling of this request.
Natasha Eubank
30 September 2009
Hi Jane
I would be grateful if you could provide me with the following
information
Details of any primary legislation or other statutory instrument
that Wirral Council must comply with, when commissioning
independent investigations.
Wirral Councils own policy on the commissioning of independent
investigations.
A link to the minutes of the relevant Council Meeting showing
endorsement of this policy.
Details of the procurement / purchasing conditions that the Council
must comply with, when commissioning an independent investigation.
In reference to the investigation of over-charging in DASS
supported accommodation, the basis by which the independent
investigators were selected.
The designations of the Council Officers responsible for selecting
the independent investigators.
In reference to the investigation of over-charging in DASS
supported accommodation, any briefings, background papers etc.
(with appropriate deletions in order to comply with DPA) that were
issued as part of the commissioning / procurement of the
independent investigation. In particular any document which
clairifies the remit and scope of the independent investigation.
I would be grateful if you could confirm acknowledgment of this
FOIA Request
Thanking you in advance for your time
Natasha Eubank
InfoMgr, FinDMT
Wirral Borough Council
1 October 2009
This email confirms receipt of your enquiry
show quoted sections
Natasha Eubank
29 October 2009
Dear InfoMgr, FinDMT,
I believe the reponse to my original query is now overdue.
Yours sincerely,
Natasha Eubank
Natasha Eubank
2 November 2009
Dear InfoMgr, FinDMT,
Not only have you singularly failed to address my query within the
specified timeframes for responding, you have demonstrated the most
stunning lack of courtesy by failing to offer an apology for the
lateness of your response.
As there has been no request for clarification of the points raised
in my original query, I can only assume your response is imminent.
Yours sincerely,
Natasha Eubank
InfoMgr, FinDMT
Wirral Borough Council
3 November 2009
Good Morning,
Your request is currently with our legal section and I am awaiting a
reply from them, until which time I am unable to respond to you.
Kind Regards
Jane Corrin
Information Manager
show quoted sections
Natasha Eubank
4 November 2009
Dear InfoMgr, FinDMT,
I find your response wholly unacceptable and therefore I request
that this email is treated as a formal complaint, to be treated as
such under the Councils complaints procedure.
As a public authority you are required to inform me as to whether
you hold the information requested and if so, communicate that
information to me, promptly but not later than 20 working days
after receipt of request. This has not been done.
I have not been asked to clarify any of the details relating to my
request, therefore the 20 working day time limit began on the day I
made my request and the clock has not stopped / reset since the
date of my original request.
My original email contained requests for a number of pieces of
information, some of which are easily accessible, and, I would
assume have previously been made public in the past. You were
required to release this information within the 20 day timeframe,
even if you required further time to determine whether exemptions
apply to the remaining pieces of information. This has not been
done.
Finally, I find the lack of courtesy demonstrated by the failure to
offer an apology particularly disturbing.
I intend to write to the Information Commissioner to advise him of
this matter and will also ask him/her to consider Wirral Councils
inability to respond to other FOIA requests within the specified
timeframes
Yours sincerely,
Natasha Eubank
Natasha Eubank
30 November 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of Wirral Borough
Council's handling of my FOI request 'Commissioning of Independent
Investigation'.
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/co...
Perhaps somebody can find it in themselves to actually action this
request this time , bearing in mind the complete and abject failure
to respond to any of my other correspondence.
Yours faithfully,
Natasha Eubank
Natasha Eubank
22 December 2009
Dear InfoMgr, FinDMT,
Please provide me with an update on the status of my request for an
internal review
Yours sincerely,
Natasha Eubank
John H Hutchinson left an annotation (4 January 2010)
Natasha, you have been treated very badly. Everything that you say is correct and you must pursue this with ICO. I would be grateful to know how you get on.
Natasha Eubank
20 January 2010
Dear InfoMgr, FinDMT,
My request for an internal review was made on the 30th November.
You have failed to address my request for internal review within
the timeframes as set out by ICO.
Frankly, you ought to be ashamed of yourselves. Your handling (or
lack of) this FOIA request has been nothing short of disgraceful.
This will be referred to ICO.
Yours sincerely,
Natasha Eubank
Natasha Eubank
20 January 2010
Dear InfoMgr, FinDMT,
Should there be any doubt as to the chronology of events
surrounding this FOIA request, please visit:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/co...
Yours sincerely,
Natasha Eubank
InfoMgr, FinDMT
Wirral Borough Council
21 January 2010
Good Morning,
I am so sorry for the delay in responding to your request for an
internal review. Our Legal section is currently reviewing your internal
review; I will contact the Legal section and ask for a progress report.
Kind Regards
Jane Corrin
Information Manager
show quoted sections
Natasha Eubank
2 February 2010
Dear InfoMgr, FinDMT,
It has now been over 4 months since my original request. I have
received no response. I requested that one of my earlier emails be
consituted as a formal complaint, to be treated as such. I have
received no response. I requested an Internal review. I have
received no response.
Jane, put quite frankly, the ICO is going to have a field day with
this.
Yours sincerely,
Natasha Eubank
Lyon, Rosemary A.
Wirral Borough Council
3 February 2010
Dear Ms Eubank,
I refer to your email of 30 September 2009 in which you made a Freedom of
Information request concerning the Commissioning of Independent
Investigations. You raised a series of queries. I am responding to that
initial request:
1.Details of any primary legislation or other statutory instrument that
Wirral Council must comply with, when commissioning independent
investigations
The Council does not hold information of the description specified in the
above query. Legislation both primary and secondary can be found on
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/
2.Wirral council's own policy on the commissioning of independent
investigations.
The Council does not have such a policy
3.A link to the minutes of the relevant Council Meeting showing
endorsement of this policy.
There are no such Minutes
4.Details of the procurement/purchasing conditions that the Council must
comply with, when commissioning an independent investigation.
The Council has Contract Procedure Rules which must be complied with in
any procurement/commissioning. Rule1.2.2 provides that the Contract
Procedure Rules do not apply to: (i) Contracts of employment . Cabinet at
its meeting on 24 September 2009 resolved that the Director of Law, HR
and Asset Management, be instructed to commence an investigation into the
treatment of a former employee in relation to allegations of bullying. I
consider that as the investigation relates to a former employee, who had a
contract of employment with the Council, the Contract Procedure Rules
would not apply to the commissioning of an investigator.
5.In reference to the investigation of over-charging in DASS, the basis by
which the independent investigators were selected.
The commissioning of an independent investigation relates to allegations
of bullying in respect of the treatment of a former employee and not to
over-charging in DASS. I consider that the basis by which the independent
investigator was selected is exempt information under Section 40 (3) (a)
(i) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, as the information
constitutes personal data and the disclosure of the information to a
member of the public would contravene any of the data protection
principles. I consider that personal data was provided by the potential
investigator to enable a selection to be made. Disclosure of the basis of
selection would mean the disclosure of such personal data and would
contravene the data protection principle that personal data shall be
obtained only for one or more specified and lawful purposes, and shall not
be further processed in any manner incompatible with that purpose or those
purposes.(Principle 2 of Schedule 1 of the Data Protection Act 1998)
6. The designation of the Council officers responsible for selecting the
independent investigators.
The Director of Law, HR and Asset Management commissioned the
investigation referred to in Clause 4 above and selected the independent
investigator.
7.In reference to the investigation of over-charging in DASS supported
investigation, any briefings, background papers etc (with appropriate
deletions in order to comply with DPA) that were issued as part of the
commissioning/procurement of the independent investigation. In particular
any document which clarifies the remit and scope of the independent
investigation.
As stated above, the independent investigation is concerned with
allegations of bullying made by a former employee. I consider that any
documents that were issued as part of the commissioning of that
investigation or which clarifies the remit and scope of that investigation
are exempt under Section 40 (3) (a) (ii)of the Freedom of Information Act
2000. The information in those documents includes significant personal
data. The disclosure of information to a member of the public would
contravene Section 10 of the Data Protection Act 1998, which concerns the
right to prevent processing likely to cause damage or distress to
employees or former employees coming within the remit of that
investigation whose personal data is contained in the information sought.
The investigation of overcharging in DASS was carried out by the
Council's Internal Audit team and the reports of that investigation are
accessible by other means , and is therefore exempt information under
Section 21 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, being reports provided
to the Audit and Risk Management Committee on 23 September 2009 and 3
November 2009 and available on the Council's website :
([1]http://democracy.wirral.gov.uk/uuCoverPa...)
I apologise for the lengthy delay in complying with your original request.
The Council has refused to supply certain of the information that you have
requested and has relied on the exemptions contained in Section 40 (2) and
that the first condition in Section 40(3) is satisfied.(as referred to
above) This part of Section 40 is an absolute exemption and not subject to
the public interest test.
You have the right under Section 17 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000
to ask for an internal review of the refusal to the information requested.
I am aware that you have already asked for an internal review because of
the failure to respond to your request of 30 September. However, I must
formally give you the right to apply for an internal review in respect of
the response given in this email. Please would you direct any request for
an internal review to Mr Surjit Tour, Head of Legal and Member Services,
Department of Law, HR and Asset Management, Town Hall, Brighton Street,
Wallasey, CH44 8ED
You do have the right to complain to the information Commissioner, if you
are dissatisfied with the outcome of any internal review.
whose office is situated at :
Information Commissioner's Office
Wycliffe House
Water Lane
Wilmslow
Cheshire SK9 5AF
Tel: 08456 30 60 60 or 01625 54 57 45
Fax: 01625 524510 [2]www.ico.gov.uk
Yours sincerely,
Rosemary Lyon,
Solicitor,
Wirral Borough Council
show quoted sections
References
Visible links
1. http://democracy.wirral.gov.uk/uuCoverPa...
2. http://www.ico.gov.uk/
http://www.ico.gov.uk/
Veridici left an annotation (4 February 2010)
It's taken WBC more than four months to come up with:
1. "The Council does not hold information of the description specified in the above query. Legislation both primary and secondary can be found on ..." with no direct link to the specific legislation.
2. "The Council does not have such a policy". Why not?
3. "There are no such Minutes". Why not?
4 and 5. I can only assume that Ms Lyon is new to the Council and therefore is in blissful ignorance of the Vic Hewitt investigation, which would mean that she has been lied to. If she is not new, then it would appear that she is being economical with the truth, although I doubt she wrote the response.
6. "The Director of Law, HR and Asset Management commissioned the investigation referred to in Clause 4 above and selected the independent investigator.". Is it a coincidence that this individual crops up time after time after time when it comes to blocking information requested by Council Tax-payers in the public interest? I think not.
7. As in 4 and 5.
Natasha, I do hope you will be taking this to the Information Commissioner. This Council's secrecy has become extremely worrisome.
I think these people need reminding just who pays their wages. Come May, with a different political climate, heads will begin to roll, methinks.
John H Hutchinson left an annotation (4 February 2010)
The secrecy that you have met is shared by those interested in "The Sail Project". It would be very interesting to know of other areas of secrecy. Go to ICO. It takes a long time. I will let you know my results.
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)






John H Hutchinson left an annotation (4 January 2010)
Link to this