Dear Sir or Madam,
Because I have been registered mentally rather than physically
disabled falsly by LA employees[ GPs & psychiatrists[ social] ]
because the LA Islington did not want to give Social Services or
assistance or address discrimination in relation to Thatcher's Cuts
in the 1980's . I do not expect you to ignore my case by using the
abusive tag when upset and voice raised because call centres wind
up and leave me in limbo like MP J.Corbyn .
Even if I was is this how you address issues of the mentally
disabled? I know it is highly likely I may get genetic dementia is
this how you continue to rip off our inheritance .

You have allowed me not to have a full pension unethically so our
leaders can have mercenary pay rises . You have denied my letter to
Commission for Human Rights in 1996 saying must follow system .Well
I have and this proves it is Corrupt and Civil Liberties abuse as
said at start .I also have a legal expert witness.

WhatDoTheyKnow?

FRAUD - DELIBERATE LOSS OF EVIDENCE
SENT TO OFFICE FOR JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS Dear Sir or Madam, Can a
Court destroy evidence as the Royal Courts of Justice have done x2
now [ 12 ye... Awaiting response.
Request sent to Ministry of Justice by Julie Shrive on 28 May 2009.
FRAUD - DELIBERATE LOSS OF EVIDENCE ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE
FRAUD - DELIBERATE LOSS OF EVIDENCE A Freedom of Information
request to Ministry of Justice by Julie Shrive Currently waiting
for a response fr... Awaiting response.
Request sent to Information Commissioner’s Office by Julie Shrive
on 28 May 2009.
Information in relation to the rule of bias for judges.
Our Ref: 5918/2009 11th May 2009 Dear Mr Canning, Thank you for
your email of 11th May 2009. I hope you will find it helpful if I
explain that the... Information not held.
Response by Office for Judicial Complaints to Derek Canning LLB
[HONS] on 11 May 2009.
More similar requests

Are you the owner of any commercial copyright on this page?

RETURN OF EVIDENCE

A Freedom of Information request to Office for Judicial Complaints
by Julie Shrive

Waiting for an internal review by Office for Judicial Complaints of
their handling of this request.

Julie Shrive

15 May 2009

Dear Sir or Madam,

Can a Court destroy evidence as the Royal Courts of Justice have
done x2 now [ 12 years work] which can prove the administration is
making legal decisions illegally ? This was basis of MA in 2003
which had to be extended a year to find noone legal monitoring .

Yours faithfully, Julie Shrive

Link to this | Send follow up

O'Brien, Darren
Office for Judicial Complaints

21 May 2009

Our Ref: 5979/2009

21st May 2009

Dear Julie,
Thank you for your email of 15th May 2009.
I hope you will find it helpful if I explain that the role of the
Office for Judicial Complaints (OJC) is to support the Lord Chief
Justice and the Lord Chancellor in their joint responsibilities for
judicial conduct and discipline. Their responsibilities cover
matters relating to allegations of personal misconduct in the way
that a judicial office holder has behaved, whether inside or
outside of the courtroom.
Issues of personal conduct include, but are not restricted to, use
of profane, sexist, or racist language, behaving aggressively, or
shouting. Where incidents involving the personal conduct of a
judicial office holder occur, the Office for Judicial Complaints
will make further enquiries. If allegations of personal misconduct
are substantiated, The Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice will
jointly decide what disciplinary action, if any, is necessary.
Neither the Lord Chief Justice, the Lord Chancellor nor officials
in this Office, is able to consider or intervene with complaints
about judicial decisions. The only way in which a judicial decision
can be challenged is by appeal to a higher court.
I am afraid that the issue raised in your email falls outside of
the remit of this office so I am unable to assist you.
If you require anything further please do not hesitate to contact
us.
Best regards,

Darran O'Brien
Administrative Support Officer

The Office for Judicial Complaints
4th Floor, Clive House,
Petty France
London
SW1H 9EX

Tel: 020 7189 2932
Fax: 020 7189 2941

www.judicialcomplaints.gov.uk

RESTRICTED - This information is intended for the recipient only
and should not be copied to a wider audience without the permission
of the author

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention
of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention
of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may
be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

Julie Shrive

22 May 2009

Dear O'Brien, Darren,

Yet again an admin person, probably in a Call centre set up, is
giving irrelevent, completely useless information, wasting time and
tax payers money . The process for raising issues have been
maladministrated by all since 1997 by most anarchaic Governmental
and private authorities, with banks of admin. governed by a sole
accountant misinterpreting dubious research, based on statistics
with discretion biased in their favour . I don't expect those in
charge everywhere, with discretion, to be bought in on contract and
NEVER contactable using admin directed .Have they not taken ethical
codes.

Nor there to be NO TRADING STANDARDS, so the villains running the
country via LAs , PCTs and hospitals . The basis for my MA was a
pilot accessing Judicial Review via Royal Courts of Justice which
never happened due to noone legal monitoring or making decisions
surely illegal? Even though this was under MPs nose???!

! I had to extend MA a year as a result .

This time a Solicitor did not litigate as requested using the
payment for this to pay my legal consultant [ who can't] and had
been paying as worked collaboratively for years - she had given me
to believe she had own company . £2000 was paid to them[ her new
p/t employer to litigate ] They just used it to pay her to sort
this evidence out which asked her never to do . She now no longer
works for them they[ Court admin] have deliberately destroyed paper
after agreeing to return not letting courier pick up as she is no
longer with firm as did not pay her The admin agreed to return but
not to allow Courier to collect then did not send deliberately
destroying . I know that if go to Leamington Spa LEGAL COMPLAINTSo
them sending bills when not signed up or doing as directed as did
at christmas [ oral] will deliberately maladministrate taking side
of Solicitoras set up same way . Probably done so altready .Surely
Law doesn't allow this fraudulent behaviour ? Or does it? I know
medicine & Government and every Charity and Court / Tribunal
does??!! What next? Advice is waste of time I need assistance &
ethical action & request internal review .

Yours sincerely,

Julie Shrive

PS This involves admin maladministrating[ hearings, discussions
without me, times manipulated and no document/letter ever signed .
Appeal Tribunal Decision [ over 8] to backdate 4 years[ contributed
to CARDIAC ARREST] for higher rate DLA which am getting but did not
backdate . The evidence backed up Affadavit & without it will never
get fair hearing, A re the admin in charge because last time MA
said the Court Service does not adress discretion surely HUB OF
MATTER Surely Civil Liberties abuse .

Link to this | Send follow up

O'Brien, Darren
Office for Judicial Complaints

27 May 2009

Our Ref: 5979/2009

27th May 2009

Dear Julie,

Thank you for your email dated 22nd May 2009. I am sorry that you
were not satisfied with my reply.

I am afraid that the Office for Judicial Complaints are only able
to investigate complaints regarding the personal conduct of a
judicial office holder. If you wish to complain about the service
you received from the court then I advise contacting the HMCS
Customer Service Unit at the following address:

1.42, 1st Floor
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ

As you acknowledge in your email, all complaints made against a
solicitor must be lodged with the Legal Complaints Service. They
can be contacted on 0845 608 6565.

I am sorry that I am unable to assist you further.

Best regards,

Darran O'Brien
Administrative Officer

The Office for Judicial Complaints
4th Floor, Clive House,
Petty France
London
SW1H 9EX

Tel: 020 7189 2932
Fax: 020 7189 2941

www.judicialcomplaints.gov.uk

RESTRICTED - This information is intended for the recipient only
and should not be copied to a wider audience without the permission
of the author

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention
of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention
of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may
be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

You left an annotation (28 May 2009)

Should an administrative court be abusing their power operating
without legal people in charge ? How does one address this as an
anarchaic administration has deliberately destroyed documents x 2 -
evidence that a disparate solicitor charged £2000 for litigation
then allowed papers to be filed from 1997 sending it back to those
who caused problem in first place Appeals Tribunals .The admin
Nottingham DLA did put into action a Tribunals decision but not
backdate [ when should a have been in 1997 when another Dept
targeted into early medical retirement because of their antibiotic
policy .Since had a cardiac so how can they not backdate decision
without me there . Have expert witness and Affadavit to prove .

Link to this

Julie Shrive

29 May 2009

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Office for Judicial
Complaints's handling of my FOI request 'RETURN OF EVIDENCE' as
surely illegal and fraudulent and an abuse of power to have an
unqualiufied biased admin maladministrating evidence to the
Government's advantage.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/re...

Yours sincerely,

Julie Shrive

L
Office for Judicial Complaints only:
Contact WhatDoTheyKnow | Built by mySociety ... and you | Dedicated
to Chris Lightfoot

Yours faithfully,

Julie Shrive

Thank you for your e-mail to the Parliamentary and Health Service
Ombudsman. This return e-mail shows that we have received your
correspondence.

Please note that my telephone and fax number have changed to an 0300 061
prefix. Please update your records.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by Government Secure
Intranet (GSi) virus scanning service supplied exclusively by Cable &
Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs.
On leaving the GSI this email was certified virus free.
The MessageLabs Anti Virus Service is the first managed service to achieve
the CSIA Claims Tested Mark (CCTM Certificate Number 2006/04/0007), the UK
Government quality mark initiative for information security products and
services. For more information about this please visit www.cctmark.gov.uk

Dear Ms Shrive

Thank you for your e-mail received on 29 May 2009. I have carefully read
your e-mail and I cannot identify what information you are seeking from
the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman. If you would like to
make a request under the information legislation I would be grateful if
you would be as specific as possible about the information you are
seeking. If you would like to make a complaint to the Parliamentary and
Health Service Ombudsman you can do this by e-mailing
[1][email address] using your personal e-mail address
rather than the whatdotheyknow e-mail address.

Yours sincerely,

Liz Hannan
Freedom of Information and Data Protection Manager
Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman

Please note that my telephone and fax number have changed to an 0300 061
prefix. Please update your records.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by Government Secure
Intranet (GSi) virus scanning service supplied exclusively by Cable &
Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs.
On leaving the GSI this email was certified virus free.
The MessageLabs Anti Virus Service is the first managed service to achieve
the CSIA Claims Tested Mark (CCTM Certificate Number 2006/04/0007), the UK
Government quality mark initiative for information security products and
services. For more information about this please visit www.cctmark.gov.uk

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Parliamentary and
Health Service Ombudsman's handling of my FOI request 'COLLUSION &
CIVIL & HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE'.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/co...

Yours sincerely,

Julie Shrive

Thank you for your e-mail to the Parliamentary and Health Service
Ombudsman. This return e-mail shows that we have received your
correspondence.

Please note that my telephone and fax number have changed to an 0300 061
prefix. Please update your records.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by Government Secure
Intranet (GSi) virus scanning service supplied exclusively by Cable &
Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs.
On leaving the GSI this email was certified virus free.
The MessageLabs Anti Virus Service is the first managed service to achieve
the CSIA Claims Tested Mark (CCTM Certificate Number 2006/04/0007), the UK
Government quality mark initiative for information security products and
services. For more information about this please visit www.cctmark.gov.uk

Dear Hannan Liz,

I am doing this in the open so everyone can see how system is being
maladministrated by those on remits told what to say by accountants
as never had a problem before the advent of remit and call centre .
Could resolve issues in 5 min now only want PROCESS??? Since 1997 &
matters are worse NB evidence destruction at Royal Courts of
Justice & you refusing numerous x to not address issues NB latest
further issue today regarding need for LCO urgently or are you too
complying with fraud ? . I am requesting someone not on remit or
contract as you only address process that can address orally as
Dyspraxic . Duty of care? Human rights - fair hearing?

Yours sincerely,

Julie Shrive

Thank you for your email. I am out of the Office until Monday 13 July and will not see your e-mail until I return. My e-mails are not being forwarded. If the matter is urgent please e-mail [Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman request email]

Please note that my telephone and fax number have changed to an 0300 061 prefix. Please update your records.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by Government Secure Intranet (GSi) virus scanning service supplied exclusively by Cable & Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs.
On leaving the GSI this email was certified virus free.
The MessageLabs Anti Virus Service is the first managed service to achieve the CSIA Claims Tested Mark (CCTM Certificate Number 2006/04/0007), the UK Government quality mark initiative for information security products and services. For more information about this please visit www.cctmark.gov.uk

Dear Hannan Liz,

LCO intervention needed [ or someone not on remit or contract to
resolve]

HUMAN RIGHTS /CIVIL LIBERTIES ABUSE

Do you give serious issues to p/t clerks in an illegal call centre
not giving fair hearings as adhering to process to maladministrate
, so delay , misinterpret deliberately, blame and punish.To: Legal
Complaints Service

Subject: Re: Freedom of Information request - BLAMING - WINDING UP
- NO OVERALL MANAGER PUTTING PHONE DOWN

Dear Sir or Madam, ABUSE OF POWER

A BREACH OF HUMAN RIGHTS [typical of call centres using data to own
bias ie: inappropriately ]

How many times have they [ LCO s] been used since Jan as suspect
what advertise as procedure s is not true - no discretion ?

The Human Rights Act says you cannot punish by no fair hearing [
trial]
] as this is what you have done winding up blaming because your
suspect corporate directors are not providing .When questioned
maladministration of case worker complied with by Manager I expect
it investigated competently and fairly .

Please address urgently as need an oral hearing with LCO in London
not on remit or contract that you have said is not going to happen
? What is going on ?

Yours faithfully,

Julie Shrive

Yours sincerely,

Julie Shrive

Dear Ms Shrive

Please find attached a further copy of the response to your request for a
review of my handling of your request for information on 29 May 2009,
which was sent to you on 20 August 2009.

Yours sincerely,

Liz Hannan
Freedom of Information and Data Protection Manager
Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman
0300 061 4320

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by Government Secure
Intranet (GSi) virus scanning service supplied exclusively by Cable &
Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs.
On leaving the GSI this email was certified virus free.
The MessageLabs Anti Virus Service is the first managed service to achieve
the CSIA Claims Tested Mark (CCTM Certificate Number 2006/04/0007), the UK
Government quality mark initiative for information security products and
services. For more information about this please visit www.cctmark.gov.uk