Follow this request
There is 1 person following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Correspondence between the Home Office and IAB on Article 5(3)
To Home Office by Phillip Main 5 December 2009
Copies of letters sent to BT and Phorm informing them of government letter to EU
To Home Office by Phillip Main 5 December 2009
Phorm/Second Phase of European Commission Infringement Case 64/08/INSO
To Home Office by P. John 29 December 2009
Detica/CView and Virgin Media
To Home Office by P. John 26 November 2009
Confidential Information disclosed by Home Office to BT and Phorm
To Home Office by Phillip Main 8 October 2009
Correspondence between Home Office and VirginMedia concerning Detica Cview
To Home Office by Phillip Main 5 December 2009
Correspondence between 121Media/Phorm and Home Office 2005
To Home Office by Phillip Main 4 August 2009
TalkTalk: Unlawful Surveillance of Internet Users
To Home Office by P. John 26 July 2010
2005 Correspondence between Home Office and BERR/DBIS concerning 121Media/Phorm
To Home Office by Phillip Main 4 August 2009
Meetings between Lord Lamont of Lerwick and Home Office
To Home Office by Phillip Main 16 April 2009
Clarification of answer to foil request made by Mr. P. John regarding Detica
Phillip Main made this Freedom of Information request to Home Office
The request was successful.
From: Phillip Main
17 December 2009
Dear Home Office,
I refer you to freedom of information request
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/de...
the final section of this request by Mr. John is as follows.
**********************
In early FoI responses you told me; (Mr. P. John)
"Unlawful interception under section 1 of the Regulation of
Investigatory Powers Act 2000 attracts a penalty, on conviction on
indictment, of imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or
to a fine, or to both. In the case of a summary conviction a person
found guilty of an offence will be liable to a fine not exceeding
the statutory maximum. "
That being the case, and assuming no trial has been authorised by
the Secretary of State, and bearing in mind the EC Infraction
Proceedings currently facing the UK Government, where can the
public report concerns about criminal offences by Internet Service
Providers who intercept and monitor the content of communications
traffic without the consent of sender or recipient?
********************************
I can see no reply to this section of the request could you please
clarify to which regulatory or government body the public should
make such complaints.
Yours faithfully,
Phillip Main
From: Lister Ian
Home Office
6 January 2010
Mr. Main,
Please find attached our response to your Freedom of Information Act
request.
Yours sincerely,
Ian
Ian Lister
Information Access Consultant
Information Access Team
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
From: Lister Ian
Home Office
6 January 2010
Mr. Main,
Please find attached our response to your Freedom of Information Act
request.
Yours sincerely,
Ian
Ian Lister
Information Access Consultant
Information Access Team
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
From: Phillip Main
6 January 2010
Dear Home Office,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of Home Office's
handling of my FOI request 'Clarification of answer to foil request
made by Mr. P. John regarding Detica'.
I asked only for the information that appeared to be missing from
the reply to Mr. John on which body should the public make a
complaint to. This was not answered in your reply to Mr. John.
By the way the "l" in foil in the title of my request was a mistake
and not deliberate or an attempt to be sarcastic. I have arthritus
in my hands which reduces flexibility and sometimes I mistype.
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/cl...
Yours faithfully,
Phillip Main
From: Brook Adrian
Home Office
11 January 2010
Dear Mr Main
Thank you for your e-mail of 6 January, in which you asked for an internal
review of your Freedom of Information request about clarification of a
response to an FoI request made by Mr P John regarding Detica.
We will aim to send you a full response by 3 March, which is forty working
days from the date when we received your request.
Regards
Adrian Brook
Information Access Team
Information Management Service
Ground Floor, Seacole Building (NW)
Home Office
2 Marsham Street
London SW1P 4DF
Tel. 020 7035 1022
External e-mail [1][email address]
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
From: Brook Adrian
Home Office
24 February 2010
Dear Mr Main
Please find attached a response to your request for an internal review of
the response to your FoI request of 17 December 2009, in the form of a
report and covering letter.
Regards
Adrian Brook
Information Access Team
Information Management Service
Ground Floor, Seacole Building (NW)
Home Office
2 Marsham Street
London SW1P 4DF
Tel. 020 7035 1022
External e-mail [1][email address]
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
From: Phillip Main
24 February 2010
Dear Adrian,
Thank you for your reply, much obliged.
Yours sincerely,
Phillip Main
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests





