Changes to a planning application

Dear Stockport Borough Council,

Re the following:-

Registration Date: 15/07/2010
Information Office: Reddish Library,
Sub Area: Heatons and Reddish
Conservation Area: Not available
Location: LAND TO THE REAR OF HARCOURT STREET / MILL LANE, REDDISH,
STOCKPORT
Statutory Class: MJR - Other Small Scale devlpmnts
Proposal: Temporary classroom, new access to Mill Lane, hard and
soft playing space, vehicle turning areas and drop off, staff and
visitors parking
Case Officer: Jim Seymour
Appeal Received Date: This case has no appeals against it

Why was a temporary classroom introduced and why have changes been
made to the car parking at this late stage and what changes are
they exactly?

If this Council does not operate in a corrupt manner, then it will
answer questions on planning matters.

Yours faithfully,

Sheila Oliver

Dear FOI Officer,

But, the Council seriously misled the Information Commission about
the contamination, the missing £5 million and the fact that the
school was never big enough. All completely provable.

We need an honest council.

Yours sincerely,

Sheila Oliver

Dear FOI Officer,

But lies were told by Stockport Council to the Information
Commission regarding this matter. It also states in council
documents that a council taxpayer is allowed to criticise the
Council and call it corrupt under Freedom of Expression rules and
human rights. The Council used this as a reason to declare me
vexatious. I had a legal right to make that statement.

Also, the Council had been centrally monitoring my emails, when it
had stated under the FOIA that it hadn't.

Add to that the fact that all the Council was claiming about the
development has proved to be untrue and all I have said has proved
correct and I have to question your suitablility for the public
office that you hold. What we need to ascertain now is whether
kickbacks have been taken to progress this planning application.
This is a serious matter.

Stockport Council must strive to become an open and honest Council.
It is a ConDem council and the ConDems and Andrew Stunell MP in
particular stress their commitment to open and honest government.
This is not what happens in practice, is it?

Yours sincerely,

Sheila Oliver

Dear Stockport Borough Council,

This is the text of the letter from the Information Commission. You
clearly should be answering questions:-

Information Commissioner's Office
Promoting public access to official information and protecting your
personal information
15th February 2010
Case Reference Number RCC0296506 / FS50232537 Stockport Borough
Council
Dear Mrs Oliver
Thank you for your letter of 7 February 2010. In your letter you
state that since the issuing of the Decision Notice in relation to
case FS50232537 on 10 November 2009 further evidence has come to
light which you feel no proves you are not vexatious. You also
state that since the Decision Notice was issued all your subsequent
requests for information made to the Council have been refused on
the basis that the requests are vexatious.
The Decision Notice found that at the time of your request, which
was 1 December 2008, your request was manifestly unreasonable and
therefore Stockport Borough Council were correct to refuse to
disclose to you the information you requested by virtue of 12(4)(b)
of the Environmental Information Regulations. All Decision Notice
must consider the circumstances at the time the request was made
and cannot take into account circumstances that post date the
request. If you are unhappy with the findings of the Decision
Notice you should appeal to the First-Tier Tribunal (Information
Rights). Any appeal should be lodged with the Tribunal within 28
days of the date of the Decision Notice. The contact details for
the Tribunal are found at the bottom of the Decision Notice.

In relation to your second point, that the Council are now refusing
all your requests for information on the basis that they are
vexatious, the Decision Notice relates specifically to the request
you made on the 1 December 2008 and does not make any finding
regarding future requests. If you have made further requests and
these have been refused you should ask the Council to review the
requests and if following this review you remain unhappy with their
response you can bring a new complaint to the Commissioner.
Information Commissioner's Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane,
Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 5AF t:0845 630 6060 f:01625 524510 e:[email
address] w:ico.gov.uk

Yours faithfully,

Sheila Oliver