Follow this request
There are 2 people following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Certified offences to the High Court?
To Local Government Ombudsmen by Trevor R Nunn 18 September 2009
How reliable/fair are local Government Ombudsman's Investigations
To Local Government Ombudsmen by Theresa Ezekpo 13 June 2010
Footnote 32
To Local Government Ombudsmen by Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS 3 June 2010
Tony Redmond Flights 2010
To Local Government Ombudsmen by mark price 24 September 2010
Hillingdon Borough
To Local Government Ombudsmen by Mr Andrews 23 May 2010
Prosecution for none existent Council Tax liability
To Local Government Ombudsmen by fred robinson (Account suspended) 4 November 2008
Unadopted roads
To Cheshire West and Chester Council by Trevor R Nunn 16 June 2009
Tony Redmond - Not complying with the Code of Conduct
To Local Government Ombudsmen by mrs t colvin 11 August 2010
Maladministration insurance claim for none existent buildings
To Local Government Ombudsmen by fred robinson (Account suspended) 3 November 2008
Staff who worked at particular councils
To Local Government Ombudsmen by Trevor R Nunn 29 April 2010
Certified offences to the High Court?
Trevor R Nunn made this Freedom of Information request to Local Government Ombudsmen
The request was successful.
From: Trevor R Nunn
18 September 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Over the last five years how many certified offences has each LGO
brought to the attention of the High Court, how many involved a
council member or officer, what were the outcomes and which council
did the member or officers work for.
Yours faithfully,
Trevor R Nunn
Trevor R Nunn left an annotation (21 September 2009)
Until the LGO certify an offence it's not by definition a certified offence.
One could ask how many certifiable offences they came across but decided not to certify to the high court but that's not the information I want.
Trevor R Nunn left an annotation (21 September 2009)
The LGO are trying to avoid answering this valid Freedom of Information Request even though the position, regarding a request that I withdrew with the same title, has been made clear to them.
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ce...
From: Trevor R Nunn
21 September 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of Local Government
Ombudsmen's handling of my FOI request 'Certified offences to the
High Court?'.
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ce...
Yours faithfully,
Trevor R Nunn
Trevor R Nunn left an annotation (22 September 2009)
On two occasions I have explained to the LGO that I withdrew an earlier FOI request of a similar name because of a glitch. The WDTK website were made of the problem with the website and marked the other request as withdrawn. Unfortunately the LGO insist on responding to the request I clearly withdrew whilst refusing to respond to this one which I haven't.
MESSAGE FOR THE LGO. PLEASE RESPOND TO THIS FOI REQUEST AND STOP RESPONDING TO THE ONE I WITHDREW.
Trevor R Nunn left an annotation (22 September 2009)
To further clarify the situation all FOI requests have a unique URL so it is not that difficult for an authority to identify an individual request, keep track of it and respond to it rather than other requests from the same requester.
Trevor R Nunn left an annotation (22 September 2009)
My blog on the subject
http://lgowatcher.blogspot.com/2009/09/c...
Trevor R Nunn left an annotation (22 September 2009)
My Blog about the difficulty I am having getting the LGO FOI officer to understand the situation.
http://lgowatcher.blogspot.com/2009/09/p...
George Cant left an annotation (23 September 2009)
Hi there
I have done a re-worded version of this one.
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/br...
From: Trevor R Nunn
23 September 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
A third and final attempt to get you to respond to this FOI request
before I submit a complaint to the Information Commissioner.
I submitted a Freedom of Information request on the 18th September
2009.
[Over the last five years how many certified offences has each LGO
brought to the attention of the High Court, how many involved a
council member or officer, what were the outcomes and which council
did the member or officers work for.]
This was submitted via the What Do They Know website and has a
unique URL and reply address. Full details can be seen by viewed at
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ce...
Unfortunately for some reason your office insists on responding to
a different Freedom of Information request. One which I had
withdrawn which has also has a unique URL and reply address.
Even when I submitted an internal review request regarding
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ce...
You wrongly replied to the withdrawn FOI request. Just what do I
have to do to get you to respond to a valid FOI request and ignore
one that was clearly withdrawn?
I have no intention of following the suggestion in your response to
my withdrawn FOI request by submitting a third request.
I have submitted a valid Freedom of Information request via the
What Do They Know website and I demand a response.
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ce...
Yours faithfully,
Trevor R Nunn
Anne Hide left an annotation (23 September 2009)
The LGO always get 'confused' over things they would rather not respond to.
They do it with complainant's letters, by adding confusion when none really exists they can wind up a complainant until they snap which gives them a valid reason for not responding at all.
From: Foi Officer
Local Government Ombudsmen
2 October 2009
Dear Mr Nunn
Our ref: CS/09/098
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request below. We will respond within the 20 working day target (which would be by 19 October 2009 - I am treating this as having been received on 21 September) or, if unable to do so, we will write to you again explaining why.
Yours sincerely
Hilary Pook
Communications & Records Manager
Local Government Ombudsman's Office
Tel: 020 7217 4734
www.lgo.org.uk
NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.
show quoted sections
From: Foi Officer
Local Government Ombudsmen
16 October 2009
Dear Mr Nunn
Our ref: CS/09/098
I attach a letter in response to the request referred to below.
Yours sincerely
Hilary Pook
Communications & Records Manager | Local Government Ombudsman's office | DL: 020 7217 4734 | www.lgo.org.uk |
show quoted sections
From: Trevor R Nunn
18 October 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of Local Government
Ombudsmen's handling of my FOI request 'Certified offences to the
High Court?'.
Your reliance on the 1974 LG Act part III section 32 not to supply
the information is perverse because I am not asking the Ombudsman
to disclose any information obtained in the course of, or for the
purposes of, the investigation of a complaint. Far from it, I
merely wish to know how many times each Ombudsman had so much
difficulty obtaining information, for the purposes of an
investigation, they had to certify an offence to the high court.
Neither do I accept that the only way to obtain the information I
seek would be to examine each complaint file. Certifying an offence
to the high court is not something an Ombudsman would do lightly or
without recourse to legal advice, whether internal or external. As
such each Ombudsman or their legal advisors would have the
information at hand. I would also argue that a Local Government
Ombudsman certifying an offence to the high court is so rare it
would be easy for identify the few times it has been done, if at
all.
Please supply the information requested without any more perverse
excuses.
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ce...
Yours faithfully,
Trevor R Nunn
George Cant left an annotation (19 October 2009)
There is a slight difference in there reply to you and me on this. http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/18...
I believe that the is a way of finding this info from there records without beaching the DPA by running a search against there database records and asking for the results as a FOI request.
http://www.amv3.com/forum/viewtopic.php?...
Trevor R Nunn left an annotation (19 October 2009)
My FOI request does not involve Data Protection issues.
From: Trevor R Nunn
1 December 2009
Dear Foi Officer,
After I received your response dated 16th October 2009 I submitted
a request for an internal review. If you don't confirm that my
internal review is being processed within the next few days I will
submit a complaint to the ICO.
Full details here
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ce...
Yours sincerely,
Trevor R Nunn
From: Foi Officer
Local Government Ombudsmen
1 December 2009
Dear Mr Nunn
Your internal review is being processed. We will send the response as soon as possible.
Hilary Pook
Communications & Records Manager | DL: 020 7217 4734 |
Local Government Ombudsman's offfice | 10th Floor |
Millbank Tower | Millbank | London | SW1P 4QP |
www.lgo.org.uk |
|
show quoted sections
Trevor R Nunn left an annotation ( 1 December 2009)
Internal reviews should be quick. If one takes longer than 20 working days then the authority should write and let you know, and it should never take longer than 40 working days.
Anne Hide left an annotation ( 4 December 2009)
Internal review was requested by Mr Nunn on the 18th of October, acknowledgement received 1st December, 32 days later and only after being prompted. 12 days longer than ICO requirements. This is not good enough from a public authority.
Trevor R Nunn left an annotation ( 4 December 2009)
Actually the first time I asked for an internal review was way back in September. The 21st of September to be precise. That is 51 days before I received the acknowledgement to my second request for an internal review. To date I have been waiting 54 days for an internal review.
From: Trevor R Nunn
14 December 2009
Dear Foi Officer,
Before I submit a complaint to the ICO I would like to give you one
final opportunity to complete the internal review (requested on the
18th September 2009) and provide an explanation as to what the
exceptional circumstances were that stopped you from completing the
internal review in a timely fashion. If I do not receive a
satisfactory response by the 18th December 2009 I will submit a
complaint to the ICO.
Yours sincerely,
Trevor R Nunn
From: Trevor R Nunn
14 December 2009
Dear Local Government Ombudsmen,
My apologies the date in my last message should have read read 18th
October not 18th September.
Yours faithfully,
Trevor R Nunn
Trevor R Nunn left an annotation (14 December 2009)
The LGO have been giving me the run around for nearly three months instead of just giving me the information requested when first requested. I appreciate they don't want to give me the information because it could discredit their organisation but that is not a valid reason for failing to supply the information as MPs found out when they tried to block their expenses from becoming public knowledge.
Trevor R Nunn left an annotation ( 4 January 2010)
Now 53 working days since I asked for an internal review of their response. A response which itself was delayed because of LGO nonsense.
Trevor R Nunn left an annotation ( 4 January 2010)
My blog on the subject (latest post)
http://lgowatcher.blogspot.com/2010/01/c...
From: Angela Thackray
Local Government Ombudsmen
11 January 2010
Dear Mr Nunn
Please find attached a letter from Nigel Karney
Yours sincerely
Angela Thackray
PA to the Deputy Chief Executive and Secretary | |
10th Floor | Millbank Tower | Millbank | London | SW1P 4QP |
[1]www.lgo.org.uk |
[2]LGO 4 col SML at 70%
NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.
References
Visible links
1. http://www.lgo.org.uk/
From: Trevor R Nunn
11 January 2010
Dear Angela Thackray,
Thank you for the information. Just a pity it took so long and
necessitated a complaint to the information commissioner. I now
consider this freedom of information request satisfactorily
concluded and will inform the Information Commissioner accordingly.
Yours sincerely,
Trevor R Nunn
Trevor R Nunn left an annotation (17 January 2010)
More on my blog here
http://lgowatcher.blogspot.com/2010/01/m...
Trevor R Nunn left an annotation ( 9 February 2010)
Read the ICO's response here
http://lgowatcher.blogspot.com/2010/02/l...
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests






George Cant left an annotation (21 September 2009)
Would it be better to ask how many certified offences they have come across during there investigations, and what was the outcome each time.
Link to this