Follow this request
There is 1 person following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Certified offences to the High Court?
To Local Government Ombudsmen by Trevor R Nunn 18 September 2009
Misleading information given to DCLG by the LGO
To Local Government Ombudsmen by Trevor R Nunn 3 June 2009
The Local Government Ombudsman
To Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council by Trevor R Nunn 27 January 2010
Recalled and revised reports.
To Local Government Ombudsmen by Trevor R Nunn 14 September 2008
Complaints
To Dacorum Borough Council by Trevor R Nunn 5 October 2008
LGO investigations.
To Rushcliffe Borough Council by Trevor R Nunn 14 January 2009
LG Act 1974 Part III Section 32(3) notices
To Newham Borough Council by Trevor R Nunn 11 October 2009
Statuary Requirement upon the law being broken
To Local Government Ombudsmen by George Cant 13 July 2010
LGO investigations.
To Manchester City Council by Trevor R Nunn 12 January 2009
Judicial reviews costs and process
To Local Government Ombudsmen by George Cant 8 February 2011
Certified offences to the High Court?
Trevor R Nunn made this Freedom of Information request to Local Government Ombudsmen
This request has been withdrawn by the person who made it. There may be an explanation in the correspondence below.
From: Trevor R Nunn
18 September 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Over the last five years how many times has each of the three LGOs
certified an offence to the High Court.
If it has happened please list by LGO and by council the person
involved worked for together with the outcome.
Yours faithfully,
Trevor Nunn
From: Trevor R Nunn
18 September 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Please ignore this particular FOI request. A final version of this
draft FOI request has now been submitted and can be read here.
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ce...
Yours faithfully,
Trevor R Nunn
From: Foi Officer
Local Government Ombudsmen
21 September 2009
Dear Mr Nunn
You have sent three messages with the same title. In the message below you refer to a draft FOI request on the 'whatdotheyknow' website. If you wish to submit a request to us, please do so - I don't intend to look at 'draft' requests elsewhere.
So as things stand, I will not respond further to any of these three messages (the other two are attached).
Yours sincerely
Hilary Pook
Communications & Records Manager
Local Government Ombudsman's Office
Tel: 020 7217 4734
www.lgo.org.uk
NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.
show quoted sections
From: Trevor R Nunn
21 September 2009
Dear Foi Officer,
I have NOT submitted three versions of this request. I was in the
process of writing this FOI request when their was a glitch on the
website. Therefore, I withdrew this request and submitted a final
version. I have made the position very clear so if you fail to
respond to the other Freedom of Information request on this subject
I will submit a complaint to the Information Commissioner.
Yours sincerely,
Trevor R Nunn
From: Foi Officer
Local Government Ombudsmen
22 September 2009
Dear Mr Nunn
You HAVE submitted three emails with the same title. I want to be sure I am responding to the right one. Your third email suggested I look at a link to a 'draft FOI request'. I suggested you submit a 'final FOI request'. If you could send a 'final' request, I will respond to it.
Yours sincerely
Hilary Pook
Communications & Records Manager
Local Government Ombudsman's Office
Tel: 020 7217 4734
www.lgo.org.uk
NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.
show quoted sections
From: Trevor R Nunn
22 September 2009
Dear Foi Officer,
Will you stop responding to the FOI request I withdrew and respond
to the final request here.
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ce...
I have now made the position quite clear on two occasions please
stop playing silly games and respond to the FOI request I have NOT
withdrawn and stop responding to the one I have withdrawn.
Yours sincerely,
Trevor R Nunn
Trevor R Nunn left an annotation (22 September 2009)
THIS FOI REQUEST WAS WITHDRAWN. Even the WDTK website marked it as withdrawn but for some stupid reason the LGO keep reactivating this withdrawn request by responding to it rather than to another FOI request I have made that has not been withdrawn. I despair at their inability to understand the situation when it has been made clear to them on at least two occasions.
Trevor R Nunn left an annotation (22 September 2009)
To further clarify the situation all FOI requests have a unique URL so it is not that difficult for an authority to identify an individual request, keep track of it and respond to it rather than other requests from the same requester.
Trevor R Nunn left an annotation (22 September 2009)
My Blog about the difficulty I am having getting the LGO FOI officer to understand the situation.
http://lgowatcher.blogspot.com/2009/09/p...
Trevor R Nunn left an annotation (23 September 2009)
Message sent to WDTK to permanently mark this particular FOI request as a withdrawn. They did mark it as withdrawn but when the LGO wrongly replied to this request rather than the second version it was re-activated.
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests






Trevor R Nunn left an annotation (21 September 2009)
Link to this