Follow this request
There are 3 people following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
CCTV Documentation
To Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council by David Ellis 22 August 2008
CCTV Disclosures
To Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council by David Ellis 13 August 2008
CCTV Policy
To Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council by David Ellis 12 August 2008
Comments to SHLA November 2007
To Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council by David Ellis 28 June 2008
Documentation for Development Proposal
To Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council by David Ellis 6 June 2008
CCTV data management
To Test Valley Borough Council by David Ellis 9 July 2008
Road verges - ecological protection scheme
To Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council by Susan Davis 7 March 2009
Bodelwyddan's current cctv scheme
To Denbighshire Council by J N Burke 28 October 2009
Copy of accounts as available for inspection under the Audit Commission Act
To Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council by Francis Irving 10 July 2008
LGO investigations.
To Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council by Trevor R Nunn 14 January 2009
CCTV controlled by Council
David Ellis made this Freedom of Information request to Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council
The request was refused by Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council.
From: David Ellis
18 July 2008
Dear Sir or Madam,
Please provide the following information :
1) The location of each camera controlled by the Council.
2) The location of all CCTV warning signs posted by the Council.
3) The date of installation of each of the CCTV cameras controlled
by the Council.
4) The retention period for data recorded by each camera.
5) For each year since its installation, the number of Subject
Access requests under the Data Protection Act 1998 received for
data from each camera.
6) For each year since its installation, the number of times data
from each camera has been passed to the Police.
7) For each year since its installation, the number of times data
from each camera has been used as evidence in Court proceedings.
Yours faithfully,
D. Ellis
Yours faithfully,
Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council
18 July 2008
Re FOI request - Ref FI/08/0167
I wish to aknowledge receipt of you request for information
I have asked the relevant officers of the council to commence enquiries
immediately to find all applicable information relating to your request
under the FOI Act and to supply any which is found to me.
Your request has to be processed within a maximum of 20 working days,
which means the Council must provide you with the information it has
(assuming no exemptions are claimed) by15August 2008. If it is possible to
provide you with the information within a shorter timescale then that will
be done.
Should you have any queries about this matter please don’t hesitate to
contact me.
Kind regards
Sue Bridges
Deputy for Regulatory & Research Officer
01642 444092
David Ellis
<[FOI #1215 email]> To: FOI requests at Redcar &
Cleveland Council
18/07/2008 07:44 <[Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council request email]>
cc:
Subject: [Possible SPAM]
Freedom of Information request - CCTV
controlled by Council
Dear Sir or Madam,
Please provide the following information : 1) The location of each
camera controlled by the Council. 2) The location of all CCTV
warning signs posted by the Council. 3) The date of installation of
each of the CCTV cameras controlled by the Council. 4) The
retention period for data recorded by each camera. 5) For each year
since its installation, the number of Subject Access requests under
the Data Protection Act 1998 received for data from each camera. 6)
For each year since its installation, the number of times data from
each camera has been passed to the Police. 7) For each year since
its installation, the number of times data from each camera has
been used as evidence in Court proceedings.
Yours faithfully, D. Ellis
Yours faithfully,
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be
published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/about...
Is [Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council request email] the wrong address
for Freedom of Information requests to Redcar & Cleveland Council?
If so please let us know by emailing [WhatDoTheyKnow contact email] -
we'll make sure future ones go to the right place.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council
12 August 2008
Ref : FI/08/0167
Further to my acknowledgement of your request, I have now received some
information from the relevant officers of the Authority. I can confirm we
do not hold all of the information requested.
You asked:
1) The location of each camera controlled by the Council.
I can confirm that we do hold the information requested, however, we
believe this information is exempt under section 31 (a) and (b) (Law
enforcement) of the FOI Act which relates to information where disclosure
would, or is likely to, prejudice:
a) The prevention and detection of crime.
b) The apprehension and prosecution of offenders.
and Section 38 (a) and (b) (Health and Safety) of the FOI Act which
relates to information where disclosure would, or is likely to:
a) endanger the physical or mental health of any individual
b) endanger the safety of any individual.
These exemptions are qualified exemptions, which means the public interest
test has to be applied. This has been done and the attachment below shows
our deliberation. On balance it is felt that it is in the public interest
to withhold this information.
2) The location of all CCTV warning signs posted by the Council.
I can confirm that we do not hold a register of this information although
I can confirm that the Borough fully complies with the legal requirements
for CCTV signage.
3) The date of installation of each of the CCTV cameras controlled by the
Council.
I can confirm that we do not hold a register with this information.
4) The retention period for data recorded by each camera.
30 Days
5) For each year since its installation, the number of Subject Access
requests under the Data Protection Act 1998 received for data from each
camera.
I can confirm that we do not hold this information.
6) For each year since its installation, the number of times data from
each camera has been passed to the Police.
I can confirm that we do not hold this information.
7) For each year since its installation, the number of times data from
each camera has been used as evidence in Court proceedings.
I can confirm that we do not hold this information.
In order to be helpful and to assist, the answers to questions 6 and 7 may
be held by Cleveland police. In order to collate information relating to
question 2 and 3 from individual manual records of CCTV installations,
would exceed the **450 (18 hour) appropriate limit set by the Freedom of
Information Act 2000, therefore this part of your request would be
refused.
I hope that this satisfies your request for information. If you are not
satisfied with how your request has been dealt with then you are free to
make a complaint either to the Council or to the Information Commissioner.
You will find details of the complaints procedure on the Council's Website
at
http://www.redcar-cleveland.gov.uk/YrCou...
(alternatively by using the A-Z Index from the home page). The Information
Commissioner is an independent person who has responsibility for
overseeing the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Freedom of Information Act
2000. More details can be obtained from the Information Commissioner***s
website at [1]www.ico.gov.uk .
Should you have any queries about this matter please don***t hesitate to
contact me.
Sue Bridges
Constitution Manager
David Ellis
<[FOI #1215 email]> To: FOI requests at Redcar &
Cleveland Council
18/07/2008 07:44 <[Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council request email]>
cc:
Subject: [Possible SPAM]
Freedom of Information request - CCTV
controlled by Council
Dear Sir or Madam,
Please provide the following information : 1) The location of each
camera controlled by the Council. 2) The location of all CCTV
warning signs posted by the Council. 3) The date of installation of
each of the CCTV cameras controlled by the Council. 4) The
retention period for data recorded by each camera. 5) For each year
since its installation, the number of Subject Access requests under
the Data Protection Act 1998 received for data from each camera. 6)
For each year since its installation, the number of times data from
each camera has been passed to the Police. 7) For each year since
its installation, the number of times data from each camera has
been used as evidence in Court proceedings.
Yours faithfully, D. Ellis
Yours faithfully,
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be
published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/about...
Is [Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council request email] the wrong address
for Freedom of Information requests to Redcar & Cleveland Council?
If so please let us know by emailing [WhatDoTheyKnow contact email] -
we'll make sure future ones go to the right place.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Visible links
1. http://www.informationcommissioner.gov.uk/
From: David Ellis
12 August 2008
Dear Sir or Madam,
Thank you for your response. With regards to your answer to
question 1 (the location of each camera) I wish to request an
Internal Review under the terms of the FOI Act 2000.
Yours sincerely,
D. Ellis.
Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council
12 August 2008
I wish to acknowledge receipt of your request for an internal review. I
can confirm this will be done as per our complaints procedure and you will
be informed of the outcome in due course.
Kind regards
Sue Bridges
Constitution Manager
David Ellis
<[FOI #1215 email]> To: FOI requests at Redcar &
Cleveland Council
12/08/2008 12:51 <[Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council request email]>
cc:
Subject: Freedom of Information
request - CCTV controlled by Council
Dear Sir or Madam,
Thank you for your response. With regards to your answer to
question 1 (the location of each camera) I wish to request an
Internal Review under the terms of the FOI Act 2000.
Yours sincerely, D. Ellis.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be
published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/about...
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council
22 August 2008
Dear Mr Ellis,
Further to your request below, I can confirm an internal review has been
undertaken. Please find the Council's response attached.
Kind regards
Sue Bridges
Constitution Manager
David Ellis
<[FOI #1215 email]> To: FOI requests at Redcar &
Cleveland Council
12/08/2008 12:51 <[Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council request email]>
cc:
Subject: Freedom of Information
request - CCTV controlled by Council
Dear Sir or Madam,
Thank you for your response. With regards to your answer to
question 1 (the location of each camera) I wish to request an
Internal Review under the terms of the FOI Act 2000.
Yours sincerely, D. Ellis.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be
published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/about...
-------------------------------------------------------------------
John Cross left an annotation (24 December 2008)
Following up on David's comments I can see no reason why not. Equally a person walking around a town in distinctive clothing is perfectly entitled to request and receive all camera footage under the Data Protection Act. This would necessarily give a very good indication of the positions of the cameras.
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests






David Durant left an annotation ( 3 September 2008)
Locations of items in public spaces can, presumably, can listed freely.
Link to this